Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Plano

Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

2460 Marsh Ln, Plano, TX 75093 · Denton County · (214) 731-5955

132 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676156 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since December 2022, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,433 in the last three years; the largest was $14,433, and the latest is dated April 17, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.21 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.34 of those hours.

46.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Dallas County Hospital District, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
3K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
8E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 17, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
  1. K
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from sexual abuse for 2 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #52) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. On 02/21/25, Resident # 1 inappropriately touched Resident # 22 and asked Resident #22 to kiss him. On 02/21/15, Resident # 1 grabbed the hand of Resident #52 and put Resident # 52's hand in his groin area. Resident # 1 then attempted to bend over and kiss Resident # 22. Resident # 1 asked Resident #52 to go to his room. A past noncompliance IJ was identified on 04/17/2025, and the IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 01:45 PM. The noncompliance began on 02/21/2025 and ended on 02/25/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the Incident investigation began on 03/31/2025. [...]
  2. K
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it · disputed by the home (informal dispute resolution)
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of 2 (Resident #22 and Resident #52) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1) LVN E and LVN M failed to immediately report sexual abuse incidents involving Resident #1 against Residents #22 and #52 to the Abuse Coordinator/the Administrator. 2) The facility failed to follow their policy to immediately protect Resident #22 and #52 from harm. 3) LVN E failed to identify sexual abuse when Resident #1 attempted to inappropriately touch Resident #52. A past noncompliance IJ was identified on 04/17/2025, and the IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 01:45 PM. The noncompliance began on 02/21/2025 and ended on 02/25/2025. [...]
  3. K
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations were made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the Administrator of the facility and the State Survey Agency for two (Residents #22 and #52) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. LVN E and LVN M failed to immediately report the sexual abuse incidents involving Residents #22 and #52 to the Administrator. LVN M observed an incident of suspected sexual abuse involving Resident #1 and Resident #22 on 02/21/2025 at 09:36 AM and LVN E observed another incident of suspected sexual abuse involving Resident #1 and Resident #52 on 02/21/2025 at 01:34 PM. [...]
  4. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge MDS was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for one (Resident #16) of one resident reviewed for discharge assessments. The facility failed to complete and transmit Resident #16's discharge MDS assessment within 14 days of completion. This failure could place the residents at risk of having incomplete records.
  5. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each Resident, consistent with Resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet Residents' mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #32) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident # 32's pressure ulcers. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a plan developed to address care needs.
  6. E
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for pharmacy. The facility failed to ensure the medication Lisinopril tablet 2.5 mg, twice a day was given to Resident #38 on 03/29/2025, 03/30/2025 and 03/31/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.
  7. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility walk-in freezer were covered, labeled, and dated. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for catheter care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D maintained the foley catheter drainage bag below Resident #32's bladder during a mechanical lift transfer. This failure placed residents at risk for the development and/or worsening of urinary tract infections and dislodgement of the foley catheter.
  9. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 (Nursing Medication cart hall 500 ) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure prompt identification of potential diversion of controlled medications when LVN B did not report a damaged blister pack of Lorazepam 0.5 mg (controlled medication). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication.
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #32 and Resident #222) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D used the required PPE for Resident#32 who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to his foley catheter, and wound , while performing a mechanical lift transfer on 04/01/25. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D used the required PPE for Resident#222 who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to his foley catheter, and wound, while performing a two person assist transfer on 04/02/25. [...]
February 29, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to date food stored in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. The facility failed to date food stored in the walk-in freezer . 3. The facility failed to cover and date food in the dry storage. 4. The facility failed to sanitize the food thermometer while measuring entrée temperatures. These failures could place residents who at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to and the facility promoted and facilitated resident self-determination trough support of resident choice for 4 of 24 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure residents were informed and provided the right to eat in the dining room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having their rights violated, poor self-esteem and socialization and a poor quality of life.
  3. E
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on, interview and record review the facility ensure residents had the right to and the facility made prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may for 3 of 24 residents (Residents #18, #32, #50) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure residents received responses to grievances and concerns. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having their rights violated, not receive responses to their grievance, a decreased of self-worth and a decline in quality of life.
  4. E
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and a resident who was incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possible for three of four residents (Residents #20, #8 and #38) reviewed for incontinence and foley catheter care. 1. CNA N failed to provide adequate perineal care for Resident #20, after an incontinent episode, when she failed to ensure all fecal matter was removed from the resident's perineal area. 2. CNA E failed to provide adequate perineal care for Resident #8, after an incontinent episode, when she failed to ensure all fecal matter was removed from the resident's perineal area and failed to clean the residents' buttocks from front to back. 3. [...]
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for six (Resident #11, Resident #113, Resident #42, Resident #114, Resident #20, and Resident # 8) of ten residents observed for infection control. 1. LVN A failed to decontaminate the glucometer which was used to obtain a fingerstick blood sugar on Resident #11 when she failed to allow the glucometer that was sanitized with a germicidal wipe to air dry before returning the glucometer to the medication cart. 2. LVN A failed to prevent cross contamination of Resident #11's insulin and a bottle of test strips, used to obtain glucose levels, when she carried both items into Resident #11's room. 3. [...]
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #13) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's nasal cannula tubing was labeled or dated. This failure could place residents at risk of respiratory infections.
December 15, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 29, 2024.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · February 29, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 17, 2025Fine $14,433

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.213.393.86
Registered nurses1.340.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.632.983.42
Nurse aides1.97
Licensed practical nurses0.90
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)46.8%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover42.9%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.45 on weekdays and 3.63 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.35 in April to June 2025 to 4.21 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.211.344.453.63 2.4%0 of 9055
Oct to Dec 20253.711.043.923.18 2.2%0 of 9267
Jul to Sep 20254.021.064.243.48 2.0%0 of 9266
Apr to Jun 20254.351.074.593.73 2.0%0 of 9162
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.915.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.214.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.33.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.09.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.225.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.312.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.32.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

61.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 282 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

13.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 304 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 179 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

76.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 167 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 214 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 214 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 157 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Dallas County Hospital District, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 3.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Foster, RobertW-2 managing employeeIndividual03/23/2022
Bradley, ShannanCorporate directorIndividual12/11/2023
Cerise, FrederickCorporate directorIndividual03/24/2014
Castaneda, EdmundoCorporate officerIndividual01/10/2022
Dallas County Hospital DistrictOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2017
Millennial Care Management, Inc.Operational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 17, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,433 in the last three years.
Does Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Prestonwood Rehabilitation & Nursing Center?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Dallas County Hospital District. Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection