Home / Washington / Seattle
2717 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 · King County · (206) 284-7012
120 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505204 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 5, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.84 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.42 of those hours.
38.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication evaluation and a physician order were obtained for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 103), reviewed for self-administration of medication. This failure placed the resident at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and resolve a grievance for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 68), reviewed for grievances. The failure to initiate, investigate, and resolve grievances for missing personal item placed the resident at risk for feelings of frustration, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for pressure ulcers (bedsore). The failure to ensure accurate assessments for turning/repositioning program placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for comprehensive care plan. The failure to develop a care plan for diabetes mellitus (a disease where the body cannot properly regulate blood sugar levels) placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was discarded upon reaching its discard date and to properly label and store medications in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (Second Floor Medication Cart 1 & First Floor Medication Cart 2), reviewed for medication labeling and storage. These failures placed the residents at risk of receiving compromised and ineffective medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain food safety and services in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 11 staff (Staff O & Staff K), reviewed for food safety. The failure to perform hand hygiene before and after serving food and not covering food items during meal delivery placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), food contamination and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were accurate for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 103), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from Multidrug-Resistant Organism [MDRO-a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) for 1 of 7 Staff (Staff E), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to accurately assess a surgical wound placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated, assessed, and obtained a physician order for safe administration of medications for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 30 & 48), reviewed for self-medication administration. The failure to complete a self-administration of medication assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse medication interactions, and complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 25 residents (Residents 89 & 190), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding discharge status and insulin (medication/hormone that regulates blood sugar levels) injections placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR-an assessment used to identify people [residents] referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual disabilities, or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing facilities for long term care) Coordinator after a significant change in status occurred for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 7), reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for oxygen were in place and/or followed according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 85 & 12), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, and related respiratory complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was followed and/or clarified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 194), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving incorrect medication dosage and formula, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organism [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed for 1 of 9 residents (Resident 72), reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and proper glove use were followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 12), reviewed for wound care, and failed to ensure clean linens were carried appropriately for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6), reviewed for laundry services. These failures placed the residents, staff, and visitors at an increased risk for infection and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine (used to prevent influenza [an infection of the nose, throat, and lungs]), was provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed the resident at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from influenza disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccine was provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for immunizations. The failure to provide the COVID-19 vaccination placed the resident at risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in residents' personal refrigerators were labeled with use by date, discarded after use by date, and refrigerators had internal thermometer for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) and for 1 of 2 resident refrigeration units (First Floor Resident Refrigeration Unit), reviewed for personal food safety. In addition, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored and maintained for 2 of 3 refrigerators (Resident 2's Personal Refrigerator & First Floor Resident Refrigeration Unit). These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error. The failure to clarify a physician's order for an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication placed the resident at risk for excessive bleeding, a decline in medical condition, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 5 of 21 residents (Residents 2, 4, 21, 60 & 16), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and implement care plans to offer fluids, for use hearing aids and/or use of diuretics (medicines that help reduce edema [fluid buildup in the body]) placed the residents at risk for possible adverse effects and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 4 of 21 residents (Residents 31, 52, 66 & 58) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice to properly care and clean respiratory equipment for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 77, 66, 87 & 49), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to properly label/store suction tubing/tip (a medical device used to remove mucus/saliva/blood obstructing a person's airway), masks for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP- helps with breathing)/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP-helps with breathing) placed the residents at risk for respiratory infections, and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored were labeled/dated when opened and/or discard food products on or before the used by date in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerators (main kitchen walk-in refrigerator) and 1 of 1 kitchen dry storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for developing food borne illness (caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure soiled linens were bagged/handled properly for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 49 & 297), failed to implement hand hygiene during meal tray delivery for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 91), and during wound care observations for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 52), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections, and related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights (an alerting device for staff to assist residents in need) were within reach for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 22 & 4), reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed the residents at risk for delayed care, accidents/falls, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure handrail (support bar) in the bathroom was maintained and was safe to use for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for use of assistive device. This failure placed the resident at risk for accidents/falls, injury, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 3 of 22 residents (Residents 66, 246 & 52) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding skin conditions placed the residents at risk for unidentified or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide personal hygiene per plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 16), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement wound care recommendation for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 52), reviewed for skin condition. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed wound healing, medical complication, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for elopement. The failure to provide the necessary supervision for Resident 1 resulted in an elopement and placed the resident at risk for injury.
20 fire safety citations on file: 10 on May 5, 2026, 7 on February 3, 2025, 3 on October 20, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.84 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.42 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.26 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.84 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.2% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 21.7% | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.08 on weekdays and 4.26 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.35 in April to June 2025 to 4.84 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.84 | 1.42 | 5.08 | 4.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.84 | 1.33 | 5.13 | 4.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 92 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.70 | 1.12 | 4.95 | 4.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.35 | 1.16 | 5.67 | 4.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.65 | $22.59 to $27.85 | 30,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $39.98 | $36.98 to $45.18 | 6,780 |
| Registered nurses | $59.71 | $49.57 to $64.54 | 69,260 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 14.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.0 | 15.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.9 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Queen Anne Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Washington: 71 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Washington: 7 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Washington: 4 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
30.2% this home
Median of homes: Washington61.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Washington0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
5.0% this home
Median of homes: Washington1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Washington98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 29 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SEATTLE OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariso LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Ari Operations, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Avamere Group LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Karl Rickard Miller Jr Revocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Miller, Karl | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 06/25/2013 | |
| Adams, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2013 | |
| Doss, Erin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/07/2018 | |
| Fanunal, Loriel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2023 | |
| Fowler, Katherine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Lott, Kristi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Newman, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Novais, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/1996 | |
| Polson, Justin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/03/2026 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/09/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/09/2025 | |
| Adams, Nancy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Doss, Erin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/09/2025 | |
| Fanunal, Loriel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fowler, Katherine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/28/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2024 | |
| Griffith, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Lott, Kristi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Newman, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Novais, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/1996 | |
| Polson, Justin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.