Rocky Knoll Health Care
N7135 Rocky Knoll Parkway, Plymouth, WI 53073 · Sheboygan County · (920) 893-6441
149 certified beds, about 140 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525337 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 27 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.99 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.14 of those hours.
58.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
July 28, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not report injuries of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. On 5/22/26, staff observed yellow and purple discoloration on R1's right ankle. An X-ray revealed multiple fractures. The injury of unknown origin was not reported to the SA.
June 10, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 138 residents residing in the facility. The facility did not consistently follow safe food cooling protocol. The facility did not ensure wash and rinse cycles for the dishwasher met the minimum required temperatures. The facility did not ensure cooked, pureed, and reheated food or food held for service reached a temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F).
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plans were revised for 2 residents (R) (R9 and R11) of 28 sampled residents. R9 started Hospice care on 11/5/25. R9's care plan did not indicate R9 was on Hospice. R11 returned to the facility on 3/5/26 from a hospitalization where a catheter was inserted. R11's care plan did not indicate R11 had a catheter.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R37) of 4 sampled residents. R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a history of falls. R37 fell at the facility on 5/27/26 and 5/30/26. admission and post-fall risk assessments did not accurately reflect R37's status.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 5 sampled residents. R9 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to an indwelling catheter. R9's catheter bag was observed on the floor on multiple occasions. In addition, staff did not wear gowns or gloves during catheter care.
July 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported timely to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect resident safety in the facility. R2 hit R1 in the dining room on 5/30/25. The allegation of abuse was not reported to the SA in a timely manner.
March 6, 2025Standard inspection · 11 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 134 residents residing in the facility. Staff did not store or date food in a manner to ensure food safety. Staff did not follow safe food cooling protocols. Staff did not adhere to temperature requirements when testing parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution. Staff did appropriately process clean dishes and did not maintain dishwasher temperature testing strips. Staff did not follow microwave safe heating procedures. Staff did not consistently wear hair restraints in the kitchen and while serving food. Staff did not perform proper hand hygiene prior to applying and removing gloves and while preparing and serving food.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and resident and staff interview, the facility did not maintain dignity for 7 residents (R) (R29, R5, R45, R50, R18, R34, and R10) of 7 residents who required dining assistance. R29, R5, R45, R50, R18, R34, and R10 required assistance with dining. During the lunch meal on 3/3/25 and the breakfast meal on 3/4/25, staff did not sit down while feeding R29, R5, R45, R50, R18, R34, and R10.
- E Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Ombudsman was notified of emergency room (ER) or hospital transfers for 6 residents (R) (R23, R36, R56, R91, R93 and R99) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The Long-Term Care Ombudsman was not notified of ER or hospital transfers for R23, R36, R56, R91, R93, and R99. In addition, the facility did not have a process in place to notify the Ombudsman of ER or hospital transfers.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately for 2 residents (R) (R43 and R228) of 6 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 134 residents residing in the facility. On 3/3/25, two bags of unidentified and unsecured medications were observed in R43's room. During observations of medication administration, staff left a tray of medication unattended on top of the medication cart.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 4 residents (R) (R17, R55, R89, and R116) of 4 sampled residents. On 3/4/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C dropped a pill on the floor in the dining room and then administered the medication to R17. During multiple care observations on 3/3/25, staff did not follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for R55. During an observation of care on 3/3/25, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-F removed soiled gloves and did not wash or sanitize hands before touching R89 and objects in R89's environment. During a wound care observation on 3/5/25, staff did not follow EBP precautions for R116.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R93) of 7 sampled residents. On 1/1/25, R93 had a low blood pressure reading of 84/43 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). R93's physician was not notified.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not provide privacy during medication administration for 2 residents (R) (R17 and R228) of 5 sampled residents. On 3/4/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C lifted the back of R17's shirt and lowered the back of R17's pants to administer a lidocaine patch in the dining room. On 3/4/25, LPN-C administered insulin to R228 in the hallway.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R13, R36, and R38) of 7 sampled residents met the PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) requirements. R13 was prescribed Abilify (an antipsychotic medication) on 1/5/23. A new PASRR Level II Screen was not completed. R36 had a positive PASRR Level 1 Screen upon admission and remained at the facility beyond the 30 day exemption period. A Level II Screen was not completed until 3/4/25. R38 had a negative PASRR Level I Screen upon admission. A Level II Screen was not completed when R38 received a qualifying diagnosis and was prescribed medication.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent pressure injuries from developing and/or promote healing for 1 resident (R) (R376) of 2 sampled residents. R376 had an unstageable pressure injury on the middle spine. The facility did not assess the wound and implement wound orders according to the facility's policy. In addition, staff did not ensure R376's wound treatment was completed as ordered and R376's care plan did not contain goals or interventions for treatment.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R43) of 1 sampled resident received the necessary care and services for oxygen therapy. R43's oxygen order did not specify the flow rate. On 3/4/25, R43 was observed without oxygen. In addition, R43's plan of care did not indicate R43 used continuous oxygen.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not implement their antibiotic stewardship program and monitor antibiotic use for 1 resident (R) (R115) of 3 sampled residents. R115 was prescribed a prophylactic antibiotic. R115's medical record did not indicate the prophylactic antibiotic was routinely assessed. In addition, the facility's infection surveillance log for antibiotic use contained inaccurate documentation for continued appropriate use of an antibiotic for R115.
July 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 2 residents (R) (R2 and R5) of 3 sampled residents. On 4/21/24, R5 approached R2 in the lobby. R5 kissed R2 on the mouth and R2 touched R5's breast. The allegation of sexual abuse was not reported to the SA.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for 2 residents (R2 and R5) of 3 sampled residents. On 4/21/24, R5 approached R2 in the lobby. R5 kissed R2 on the mouth and R2 touched R5's breast. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of sexual abuse. The facility's investigation did not include interviews with R5 and R2, interviews with other resident interviews, and interviews with staff who were working at the time of the incident.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure care plan interventions were followed which resulted in a resident-to-resident interaction between 2 residents (R) (R2 and R5) of 11 sampled residents. On 4/21/24, R5 approached R2 and kissed R2 on the mouth. R2 then touched R5's breast. The incident occurred while R2 self-propelled R2's wheelchair back from the dining room. R2's care plan contained an intervention to escort R2 to and from R2's room and keep R2 separate from female residents. The intervention was not consistently followed.
February 14, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner which had the potential to affect all 113 residents residing in the facility. Procedures for reheating food in a microwave were not followed. Initial cook temperatures were not consistently documented. Four boxes of Italian Wedding Soup were stored on the floor of the walk-in freezer. The edge of the mixer contained dried debris and the mixer was not covered.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was served at a palatable temperature for 7 Residents (R) (R9, R1, R57, R72, R83, R13, and R130) of 26 sampled residents. R9, R1, R57, R72, R83, R13, and R130 indicated hot food is not always served hot. During the lunch meal on 2/12/24 and 2/13/24, food was not served at a palatable temperature.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and power of attorney (POA) interview, and record review, the facility did not notify a POA of a medication change for 1 Resident (R) (R89) of 26 sampled residents. R89's metformin (a medication used to treat diabetes) was discontinued on 1/23/24. R89's POA was not notified or informed of the risks versus benefits prior to discontinuation of the medication.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure written notification of financial liability via an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) was provided for 1 Resident (R) (R69) of 2 residents who remained in the facility when their Medicare Part A benefits ended. The facility did not provide an ABN to R69's Health Care Agent when R69's Medicare Part A benefits ended on 1/7/24 and R69 remained in the facility.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (a screening and assessment tool that forms the foundation of a comprehensive assessment and is used to guide care planning and monitoring) accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 Resident (R) (R97) of 26 sampled residents. R97's MDS assessment, dated 10/18/23, indicated R97's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment (used to assess cognitive status in the elderly) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2-9) interview (used to assess depression) were not completed. In addition, R97's MDS assessment, dated 1/17/24, indicated R97's BIMS assessment was not completed, but a partial staff assessment was completed. R97's PHQ-2-9 indicated R97 was rarely/never understood. A staff assessment indicated R97 was severely impaired and rarely/never made decisions; [...]
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 2 Residents (R) (R57 and R83) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition received the necessary care and services to prevent or monitor weight loss. R57 had an order for weekly weights which were not consistently completed. In addition, R57 did not consistently receive R57's nutritional supplement. R83 had an order for bi-weekly weights which were not consistently completed.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vaccinations were reviewed, offered, or administered for 2 Residents (R) (R8 and R12) of 5 residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility did not review R8's vaccination history or offer R8 the PCV20 (Prevnar 20®) vaccine. The facility did not review R12's vaccination history or offer R12 the Prevnar 20® vaccine.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 10, 2026, 5 on March 6, 2025, 8 on February 14, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Use approved construction type or materials.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- E Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Install proper backup exit lighting.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- C Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.99 | 4.21 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.14 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.69 | 3.77 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.32 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.52 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.6% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 39.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.11 on weekdays and 4.69 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 43.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.09 in April to June 2025 to 4.99 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.99 | 1.14 | 5.11 | 4.69 | 43.0% | 0 of 90 | 140 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.04 | 1.12 | 5.16 | 4.73 | 42.8% | 0 of 92 | 137 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.19 | 1.06 | 5.34 | 4.80 | 39.3% | 0 of 92 | 141 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.09 | 1.14 | 5.25 | 4.69 | 43.7% | 0 of 91 | 140 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.95 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 8.8% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.4 | 18.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.2 | 23.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.5 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: COUNTY OF SHEBOYGAN.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Sheboygan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/18/1983 |
| County of Sheboygan | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/18/1983 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Optum 360 Services, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Wipfli LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/03/1998 | |
| Clinton, Katherine | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/11/2017 | |
| Fetterer, Jeremy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/04/2007 | |
| Kohal, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/31/2022 | |
| Krause, Alayne | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/22/2023 | |
| Loeffler, Cortney | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/18/2021 | |
| Lunde, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/04/2025 | |
| Optum 360 Services, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/22/2025 | |
| Wipfli LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/06/2025 | |
| Clinton, Katherine | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/11/2017 | |
| Fetterer, Jeremy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/04/2007 | |
| Kohal, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/31/2022 | |
| Loeffler, Cortney | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/18/2021 | |
| Lunde, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 28, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Plymouth Health Services Plymouth, 3.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Sheboygan Senior Community Inc Sheboygan, 10 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Willowdale Health Services New Holstein, 11.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Homestead Health Services New Holstein, 11.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Sheboygan Health Services Sheboygan, 11.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Edenbrook Sheboygan Sheboygan, 12.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Morningside Health Services Sheboygan, 12.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Sheboygan Progressive Health Services Sheboygan, 13.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Wisconsin Board on Aging and Long Term Care, Ombudsman Program, 1-800-815-0015. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Wisconsin DHS Provider Search (Survey History), where Wisconsin publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Rocky Knoll Health Care's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Rocky Knoll Health Care 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Rocky Knoll Health Care get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 10, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
- Has Rocky Knoll Health Care been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Rocky Knoll Health Care accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Rocky Knoll Health Care?
- CMS lists 20 owners and managers. Legal business name: COUNTY OF SHEBOYGAN.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.