115 Park Avenue, Yonkers, NY 10703 · Westchester County · (914) 423-9800
120 certified beds, about 108 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335398 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2024, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 48 health citations since August 2018 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
38.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Carerite Centers, an affiliated group of 34 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 48 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the abbreviated survey, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent and promote healing of pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident # 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, Resident #4 had deep tissue injuries to both feet and heel booties, recommended by the wound care consultant on 10/29/2024, were not implemented until after 01/07/2025.
Inspectors wroteBased on video surveillance, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161), the facility did not ensure that residents were free from abuse, neglect, and mistreatment for 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/19/2025 at 11:55 PM, video surveillance reviewed revealed interaction between resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #1. Resident #1 was seated in their wheelchair in the doorway of their room while Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was at the medication cart with their back turned to Resident #1. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 is seen turning around and began a verbal exchange with Resident #1. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 is seen moving behind Resident #1's wheelchair and attempt to hold Resident #1's hand down and force him back into their room. Resident #1 is seen resisting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). Specifically, on 08/19/2025 at 11:55 PM, video surveillance footage revealed Licensed Practical Nurse #1 engaged in a verbal interaction with Resident #1. Resident #1 and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 were using hand gestures during the interaction. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 moved behind the wheelchair and attempted to pull the resident back into their room. Resident #1 was seen resisting and Licensed Practical Nurse #1 continued to forcefully pull the resident while seated in the wheelchair, into their room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (2595161) the facility did not ensure that residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, comprehensive care plan and the resident's choices for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pain. Specifically, Resident #1 had a Physician's order for Oxycodone HCL 5 mg orally every 6 hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 on 08/25/2025 revealed on 8/19/2025, they requested their pain medication from Licensed Practical Nurse #1 around 11:54pm because they were in pain. Resident #1 did not receive their pain medication. Resident #1 received their next dose of pain medication at 1:28AM on 08/20/2025, approximately eight hours and thirty-four minutes after the previous administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331684, NY00334367), the facility did not ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal care for 2 of 3(Resident #5, #6) residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, (1) review of Resident #5's certified nurse assistant documentation for the months of January and February 2024 revealed bladder and bowel incontinence care was not provided by direct care staff on 19 occasions out of 31days. Further review of the January 2024 and February 2024 certified nurse assistant documentation revealed areas of care including showers, personal hygiene and assistance during meals were not consistently signed as being provided by direct care staff; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00334367, NY00331640) the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistent for residents according to the Facility Assessment. Nursing and certified nurse assistant staff levels were frequently below the levels determined by the facility to be necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Specifically, review of the facility daily staffing sheets for January 2024 and February 2024 revealed staffing was not adequate across various shifts based on the unit needs and (Provider Average Ratio)PAR levels documented in the facility assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00334367), the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication error for 4 (Residents #17, #20, #24, #34) out of 42 residents reviewed for medication. Specifically, on 2/25/2024 there was no nurse on the second floor to administer medications to the residents during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. 36 out of the 42 residents on the unit did not receive their medication with 30 of the residents having significant medications. Significant Medications that were not administered included: Antihypertensives, Retroviral, Anti-seizure, Anti-depressants, Antidiabetics, Insulin, Narcotics, Anticoagulants, Antibiotics, Immunosuppressants, Anti-Parkinsonism and Anti-psychotics.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey (NY00360526), the facility did not ensure 1(Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, 1.) Resident #1 who had a stage 2 pressure ulcer that was resolved on 10/29/24 and reopened on 1/28/25, was not being turned and positioned prior to 1/28/25 as per the certified nurse aide documentation. Furthermore, the Wound Care Doctor gave instructions on 1/28/25 to turn and reposition the resident every 1-2 hours while in bed and every 30 minutes while in chair, and the certified nurse aide documentation revealed that it was not being done.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331684), the facility did not ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, Resident #5 had a weight loss of fifteen percent in thirty days. Review of Resident #5's certified nurse documentation revealed direct care staff were not consistently documenting the resident's intake and there were several occasions when the resident did not consume or only consumed twenty five percent of their meal. There was no documented evidence of nursing or administration being informed of Resident #5's poor intake.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00352230, NY00331567), the facility did not ensure the report of the results of an investigation was submitted to the New York State Department of Health in accordance with State law within 5 working days of the incident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) On 8/22/2024, Resident #2 was witnessed by Certified Nurse Aide #1, hitting Resident #3 on the back of the head with a flexi-bar (rubber cylinder used for therapy). Review of the 5-day investigative conclusion submission revealed it was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 8/28/2024; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00353705, NY00352230, NY00332692), the facility did not ensure that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 6 (Resident #1, #2, #3, #38, #39, #40) of 6 residents reviewed. Specifically, (1) on 9/8/2024 Resident #1 reported to Licensed Practical Nurse #1 that Resident #2 had touched them inappropriately in their private area while they were roommates. Review of the facility incident report revealed the certified nurse aides assigned to the third-floor unit on 9/8/2024 did not provide any written statements regarding the incident. Review of the investigative summary revealed it was not dated and was not signed indicating it was not reviewed by the Medical Director; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00352230), the facility did not ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 8/22/2024 Certified Nurse Aide #1 witnessed Resident #2 with a known history of inappropriate behaviors towards staff and others, striking Resident #3 (who had a history of wandering behavior and was care planned for supervision) on the head with a flexi-bar (rubber cylinder used in therapy) from behind. The investigative conclusion documented there is no evidence that any alleged abuse had occurred.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure the accuracy of resident's assessments for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a documented history of wandering but was not identified as at risk for elopement by the facility on admission. Resident #4 was placed in a room on the first floor of the facility and on 1/14/2024, the resident exited the facility front doors unescorted after they were buzzed out by the Receptionist.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive patient centered care plan was developed for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a documented history of wandering. Resident #1 exited the facility through the front doors unescorted on 1/14/2024, after being buzzed out by the Receptionist. Review of Resident #4's care plan revealed they did not have a wandering or potential for elopement care plan in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00331567), the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for elopement. Specifically, on 1/14/2024 Resident #4 exited through the front doors of the facility unescorted, after being buzzed out by the Receptionist at 3:33 PM. Resident #4 with a documented history of wandering, was assigned a room on the first floor of the facility. Resident #4 exited the facility and wandered into a neighboring home near the facility and the neighbor called 911. The facility was notified of Resident #4's whereabouts around 4:31 PM by emergency medical services after the resident was transferred to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00347185) surveys from 8/6/2024 to 8/13/2024, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This was evident for 2 (Resident #88 and #213) of 3 residents reviewed for pain. Specifically, 1) Resident #88 was not administered pain medication in accordance with Physician's Orders, was not provided non-medication interventions to address pain, and had recommendations for pain management by a Physiatrist that were not reviewed by the Physician Assistant, and 2) Resident #213 was not administered pain medication in accordance with Physician's Orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00347185) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the well-being of each resident in accordance with the facility assessment. This was evident for 2 (2nd and 3rd Floor) of 3 units during staffing review. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure prompt resolution of a resident's grievance and did not establish a grievance policy including all necessary elements. that includes notifying residents of their right to file a grievance . This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the facility Grievance Policy did not include the method used to notify residents of the grievance process and the resident's right to obtain the decision in writing, 2) Resident #10's Designated Representative reported the resident was missing clothing and glasses and was not provided with a prompt resolution.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure an effective discharge planning process was developed and implemented focused on the resident's discharge goals, involved the resident and resident representative, and was updated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, upon return from the hospital and without the Designated Representative's involvement, Resident #10 was issued a Discharge Notice listing the destination as a skilled nursing facility that was not suitable for the resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification survey the facility did not ensure that each resident in need of assistance, to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #95 was not provided incontinence care as need or as scheduled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00341698) on 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided to an existing pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 81) reviewed for pressure ulcer. Specifically Resident #81 was found with a skin opening on the sacrum on 8/1/2024 and a registered nurse did not assess the area or notify the physician until the following day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/13/2024, the facility did not ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care at each visit. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Physician Assistant did not review a Nursing Pain Evaluation or the Physiatrist's pain management recommendations for Resident #88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00338972) survey from 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #10's behavioral health plan of care was not individualized, reviewed, and revised to address symptomology related to their mental illness diagnoses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 08/6/24 to 08/14/24, the facility did not ensure a medication error rate of no more than 5%, during a medication administration observation, when 2 of 25 opportunities (8%) resulted in error for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5). Specifically, 1) Resident # 5 was administered a crushed form of Enteric coated aspirin instead of chewable and a crushed form of Depakote delayed release tablet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00341698) on 8/6/2024 to 8/14/2024, the facility did not ensure that rehabilitative services were provided for 1 of 2 residents (#81) reviewed for weight loss. Specifically, Resident #81 the physician's order for a Speech Therapy evaluation for slow eating and chewing, was not completed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey (08/06/24 to 08/14/24), the facility did not ensure infection control prevention practices including hand hygiene were maintained to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (#15 and #4) of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Certified Nurse Aide #1's hand came in contact with Resident #15 food a during lunch meal observation and Licensed Practical Nurse #11 did not follow proper hand hygiene during a wound care treatment for Resident #4. 1) Resident #15 was admitted with diagnoses which included Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool dated 6/30/24 documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required tray set up for eating. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 08/06/24 to 08/14/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and received education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #51) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #51 was offered, declined, or educated on the pneumococcal immunization.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00334044), the facility did not ensure residents right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 2/21/24, Dietary Aide #15 was witnessed by a Certified Nurse Aide #14, verbally threatening Resident #3 and pulling on Resident #3 beaded necklace. Resident #3 written statement documented that a staff member entered his room and held them by the shirt and chest area and verbally threatened him. Resident #3 was assessed with no injuries. Facility Investigation concluded abuse occurred.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00342153) the facility did not develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1. Specifically, the heels of Resident #1 were not offloaded and or heel booties were not applied as per physician order and as per care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview conducted during a Recertification Survey the facility did not ensure labeling, dating and the monitoring of refrigerated food was maintained in accordance with Professional Standards of Food Safety. Specifically, prepared and frozen foods in the kitchen refrigerator and in the dry food storage room were not labeled and or not dated.
Inspectors wroteF583 Based on observation and interviews conducted during recent recertification survey the facility did not ensure privacy was maintained for 1 of 1 resident (#72) reviewed for privacy. Specifically, 2 residents (#72 and #9) of the opposite sex were placed in adjoining rooms with a shared bathroom.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during recertification survey, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #158) reviewed for catheters, and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident # 96,) the facility did not ensure that it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infections. Specifically, Resident #158 catheter (urinary drainage tube) drainage bag (bag for collecting urine from the urinary drainage tube) was observed uncovered and on the floor on multiple days of survey, and Resident #96, had uncovered oxygen tubing and humidification bottles on several observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure accurate staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. Specifically, 1) the facility did not post the total and actual hours of licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care daily and 2) did not provide complete staffing records for the 18 months reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident, or designated representative of cognitively impaired residents, was given the opportunity, if so desired, to formulate a written advance directive. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (#102 and #46). Specifically, (1) the designated representative for Resident #102 was not educated regarding the right to have an advanced directive formulated for the resident not to be resuscitated and (2) Resident #46 had a physician's order not to be intubated and there was no documented evidence that Resident #46 gave written consent for this order.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it implemented written policies and procedures for reporting an allegation of abuse made by a resident for 1 of 4 residents (#82) reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteSurveyor: [NAME], [NAME] A. Based on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that all Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) were electronically transmitted to the Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system within 14 days of the final completion date for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for resident assessment. Specifically, residents (R) #1, #3, and #4 did not have the MDS data submitted within 14 days of completion of the MDS assessment. The finding is: The following residents were reviewed for Resident Assessment: - R #1 had an MDS admission Assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/3/18, a completion date of 7/10/18 was submitted on 7/31/18; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 1 resident (#5) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, the facility did not provide Resident #5 who had a tracheostomy (an incision is made on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea) with a device to enable the resident to speak more normally and/or communicate with others. The finding is: Resident # 5 had diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the bronchus and lungs and Respiratory Failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) of 12/27/17 indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and required tracheostomy care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide the necessary care and treatments to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 1 resident (#28) reviewed for non pressure related skin ulcer/wound. Specifically, the treatment plan was not revised to prevent further recurrence of a chronic skin irritation. The finding is: Resident # 28 was a admitted with diagnoses including Seizure Disorder and End Stage Renal Disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment and screening tool) of 5/2/18 documented the resident scored 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (a test used to measure orientation and memory recall) indicating she was moderately cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that an audiology evaluation was performed as ordered by the medical provider for 1 of 2 residents (#46) reviewed for vision and hearing. The finding is: Resident #46 has diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiovascular disease, and Renal Insufficiency. The Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set; a resident assessment and screening tool) dated 2/14/18 documented that the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief interview for Mental Status) indicating the resident is cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated that the resident's hearing was adequate and did not use hearing aids. A subsequent Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented adequate hearing and no hearing aid was being used. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 1 of 2 residents (#94) reviewed for urinary incontinence that the necessary care to promote and maintain bladder continency to the extent possible was provided. Specifically, the type of urinary incontinence was not identified and a patient-centered care plan, based on the type of incontinence and maintenance versus restorative goals and interventions, was not developed to address the bladder incontinence across all shifts.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure for 2 out of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition (#46 and #94) that there was coordination between nursing and dietary to ensure that the fluids offered to the resident did not exceed the physician's order to prevent fluid overload.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility (1.) did not provide for 1 of 1 residents (#5), reviewed for respiratory care, a device to enable the resident to speak more clearly and to be more easily understood during conversation with others. Additionally, (2.) manual resuscitative devices (ambu bags) were not easily accessible in case of an emergency for resident (#5) and for one random resident (#51) with a tracheostomy (trach) tube on the First floor unit. A tracheostomy is a surgical procedure which consist of making an incision on the anterior aspect of the neck and opening a direct airway through an incision in the trachea.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not provide ongoing evaluation and management of pain for 1 of 4 residents (#46) reviewed for pain management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that medical supervision was provided for 1 of 5 residents (#45) reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, the physician or the Nurse Practitioner (NP) did not address the resident's significant unplanned weight loss and the abnormal nutritionally-related laboratory values in light of adequate protein, calories and fluid consumption. The finding is: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's admitting diagnoses included Anemia, Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Kidney Disease. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and screening tool) done on 2/2/18 noted that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required total assistance for all activities of daily living, weighed 116 lbs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5%. This was evident for 2 of 6 residents (#267 and #38) observed during a medication pass for a total of 3 out of 31 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 9.6%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the necessary dental services were provided in a timely manner including arrangements to obtain dentures for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #94) reviewed for dental services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were consistently offered and provided with evening snacks. Specifically, 7 out of 10 alert and oriented residents from 2 out of 3 units, that attended the resident council meeting stated that they were not offered a snack, or if they asked for a snack they were not provided with an evening snack.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that measures were in place to prevent the spread of infection and cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #5). The resident was observed on multiple occasions using his bare fingers to cover his tracheostomy tube (a type of airway inserted directly into the trachea) to communicate with others after touching objects and surfaces, potentially contaminating the tracheostomy (trach) tube without using proper hand hygiene. Additionally, resident care items including oxygen tubes and feeding supplies were stored in containers that were placed directly on the floor on 2 out 3 facility units (1st and 3rd).
23 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 14, 2024, 6 on October 27, 2021, 10 on August 7, 2018.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.28 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.98 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.5% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 31.3% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.40 on weekdays and 2.98 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.36 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.28 | 0.50 | 3.40 | 2.98 | 2.2% | 0 of 90 | 108 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.33 | 0.57 | 3.42 | 3.07 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.22 | 0.45 | 3.36 | 2.84 | 5.4% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.36 | 0.53 | 3.55 | 2.91 | 3.1% | 0 of 91 | 105 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.2 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.6 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.0 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.2 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sans Souci Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
46.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 186 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 175 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 118 eligible stays.
68.2% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 154 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 247 residents counted.
5.1% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 247 residents counted.
99.1% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 110 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WESTCHESTER PARK LLC. CMS links this home to Carerite Centers, a group of 34 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westchester Park Ventures LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/27/2008 |
| Einhorn, Neal | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 05/27/2008 |
| Friedman, Mark | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 33% | 05/27/2008 |
| Minzer, Miriam | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 29% | 05/27/2008 |
| Minzer, Naftali | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 05/27/2008 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2008 | |
| Friedman, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2008 | |
| Minzer, Miriam | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/27/2008 | |
| Chalmers, Sherly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/20/2024 | |
| Rabadi, Ammir | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/1999 | |
| Schachter, Aryeh | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/29/2023 | |
| Chalmers, Sherly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/20/2024 | |
| Rabadi, Ammir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/1999 | |
| Schachter, Aryeh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/29/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.