Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Schulenburg

Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center

111 College St., Schulenburg, TX 78956 · Fayette County · (979) 249-6537

146 certified beds, about 109 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455908 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 11, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 17 health citations since October 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,827 in the last three years; the largest was $8,827, and the latest is dated December 13, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.

41.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 14, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1 that was individualized to her care needs, which included ADLs, activities, specialized diet, dementia and related behaviors. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their needs met to attain their highest practicable well-being.
March 11, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to ensure that the medications stored in the medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] were not expired. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for adverse effects and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medication or treatment.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident# 17, and Resident #92) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's and Resident #91's nails were cleaned and did not have any rough edges. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or promote wound healing for one ( Resident # 6 ) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to perform Resident #6's thorough skin assessments on Sunday 03/08/2026 new skin issues to right gluteus (buttock), rear left thigh, and right fourth toe. These failures could place residents at risk for worsening skin concerns leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections.
  4. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of two kitchens reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Assistant [NAME] D used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #21 and Resident #87) of four residents reviewed for infection control practices, in that: The facility failed to ensure Med Aide C sanitized the blood pressure monitor before Resident #21, in between Resident #21 and Resident #87 and after Resident # 87 while obtaining blood pressure. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated with cross-contamination and infections.
December 10, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of two kitchens reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Assistant [NAME] A used proper hand hygiene during food preparation.2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Assistant [NAME] A used appropriate oven mitt to remove food from the oven and prevent cross-contamination of the food. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
December 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #109) of 4 residents reviewed for elopement on 10/27/24. The facility failed to put interventions in place to prevent Resident #109 from eloping from the facility when she walked out of the memory care unit and exited the fire alarm gate on 10/27/24. Resident #109 was found by an exit door again on 12/01/24 . Resident has history of opening the doors after pushing on them for 15 seconds allowing the door to open. An IJ was identified on 12/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:30 PM. [...]
  2. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with resident rights, which included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 10 residents (Residents #17, #41 and #98) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to update Resident #17's care plan to reflect current needs for suprapubic catheter care. 2. The facility failed to update Resident #17's care plan to reflect current needs with transfers. 3. The facility failed to update Resident #41's care plan to reflect current diet consistency orders. 4. The facility failed to update Resident #98's care plan to reflect current needs with transfers. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest practical well-being.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents rights to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's out of hospital do-not-resuscitate (OOH-DNR) order form was signed by a physician. These failures could place residents at-risk of having their wishes dishonored or delay necessary medical treatment or intervention due to confusion.
  4. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from resident neglect for one (Resident #12) out of three residents reviewed for neglect. The facility failed to ensure FTA from ensuring the facility lift was located at the back facility door to transfer Resident #12 off the van onto the lift . Resident #12 fell from the van onto the lift located on the ground on 11/15/2024. This noncompliance was identified as PNC. The deficient practice occurred on 11/15/2024 and in-service was completed on 11/15/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of neglect, injury, and psychosocial harm.
  5. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #38) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #38's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, a medication to help with pain. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications.
  6. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for medications. The facility failed to remove 2 expired suppositories and 1 bag of expired medication from the medication storage room when it was observed on 12/11/24 at 12:50 PM. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of receiving expired and/or contaminated medications which could result in adverse health consequences.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #9, Resident #25 , Resident #102, ) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure all staff donned PPE when entering rooms of residents' rooms who were on droplet precautions. 2. The facility failed to ensure PPE was adequately stocked for residents on droplet precautions. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.
November 14, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable state laws for 8 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8) of 9 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to ensure the ADON had a current and active license. The ADON provided assessments to Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 while her RN license was expired from [DATE] through [DATE]. This could place residents at risk for inadequate care and/or services.
October 26, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory electronic submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. The facility failed to submit direct care staffing information on the schedule specified by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), but no less frequently than quarterly for 1 of 3 quarters reviewed for payroll data information (Quarter 3 2023). The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 3rd quarter (April 1 - June 30) of fiscal year 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 16, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of four residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #6 and Resident #30). A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's catheter was secured to her body with a catheter secure device per the care plan and physician's orders. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident 30's catheter was secured to his body with a catheter secure device per the care plan and physician's orders. This failure to secure catheters placed residents with urinary catheters at risk for traumatic removal and catheter acquired infections.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 11, 2026, 5 on December 13, 2024.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · March 11, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. C
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · March 11, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · December 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · December 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · December 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 13, 2024Fine $8,827
December 13, 2024Payment Denial 1 days from January 15, 2025

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.713.393.86
Registered nurses0.280.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.192.983.42
Nurse aides2.33
Licensed practical nurses1.10
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)41.4%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.92 on weekdays and 3.19 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.18 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.283.923.19 16.3%0 of 90109
Oct to Dec 20253.830.224.033.33 15.9%0 of 92107
Jul to Sep 20253.530.223.653.22 17.9%0 of 92109
Apr to Jun 20253.180.193.272.94 19.4%0 of 91121
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
31.115.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.80.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.83.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.814.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.53.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.89.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
40.925.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.812.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.72.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: OAK MANOR, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Oak Manor, Inc.5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/24/1978
Clg Family Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2025
Greive, CharlesManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/26/2006
Greive, CharlesCorporate officerIndividual09/26/2006
Oak Manor, Inc.Operational/managerial controlOrganization04/24/1978
Hatfield, PeytonOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/13/2024
Oak Manor, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization03/02/2026
Greive, CharlesAdp of the SNFIndividualNO DATE PROVIDED
Hatfield, PeytonAdp of the SNFIndividual10/31/2024
Klaus, BartAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2024
Paschall, KrissiAdp of the SNFIndividual03/31/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 11, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 15, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 11, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 11, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 11, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,827 in the last three years.
Does Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers. Legal business name: OAK MANOR, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection