206 N Smith St., Weimar, TX 78962 · Colorado County · (979) 725-8564
94 certified beds, about 35 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675922 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since April 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,348 in the last three years; the largest was $10,348, and the latest is dated March 30, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.19 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.31 of those hours.
92.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not verbally and emotionally intimidate and abuse Resident #1 from 11/10/2025 through 03/04/2026, by speaking rudely to Resident #1, excluding the resident from smoke breaks, restricting Resident #1 from approaching or passing by the nurse's station, and removing Resident #1's smoking items from the nurse's station to keep Resident #1 from approaching the nurse's station. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, and mental anguish and fearfulness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was transferred or discharged had complete and accurate documentation in their clinical records, including required information to support continuity of care for closed record one of 4 residents (CR) reviewed for transfer-discharge. The facility failed to ensure CR's transfer/discharge documentation was completed in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to affect all residents requiring transfer or discharge by increasing the risk of miscommunication, gaps in care, and adverse outcomes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to complete a psychosocial assessment after Resident #1 alleged physical abuse. This failure could place residents at risk for potential injuries, physical and/or emotional pain, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for resident accordance with professional standards and regulatory requirements for closed record one of 4 residents (CR) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to complete an incident report reflecting the resident's current condition and care provided after CR had a change in condition which resulted in a hospitalization. This failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility by compromising continuity of care, clinical decision-making, and resident safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment describing services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #18's behavior of entering male residents' rooms and taking off her clothes. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for two (Resident #15 and Resident #26 ) of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration. -Resident #15 was given Midodrine for her hypotension (low blood pressure) outside of prescribed parameters on 8/4/2025 at 10:00am and 6:00pm, 8/10/2025 at 10:00am and 8/28/2025 at 10:00am. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for two (Nurse medication Cart used for hall A and Nurse medication Cart for secured unit) three medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. -The Nurse Cart (unsecured unit) and the Nurse cart (secured unit) had multiple medications open, some had no names and were not dated. This failure could place all residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications and drug diversionObservation of the Nurse Cart for hall A on 09/04/2025 at 1:27 PM revealed the following medications open, with no names and not dated: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to a dignified existence and treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #15) of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. -Resident #15 was observed eating in the dining room while soiled and staff present did not notice before serving Resident #15 her breakfast. This deficient practice could lead to psychosocial harm due to feelings of low self-esteem and/or embarrassment regardless of resident cognition. Record review of Resident #15's face sheet last captured 09/05/2025, she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE]. Her medical diagnoses included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 (Dumpster A) of 1 facility dumpsters observed for proper garbage disposal. -Dumpster A's side door was open with trash inside on 9/2/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of contact with pests and associated diseases. Observation on 9/2/2025 at 6:34pm, revealed the left lid on Dumpster A was open. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 9/2/2025 at 6:35pm, she said the dumpster's lids should be closed at all times. The lids being left open could cause cross contamination, trash could be blown out by the wind and could get in the yard and smell. Animals could also get in the dumpster and could injure staff. The Dietary Manager said that she verbally educated housekeeping and nursing staff to close it, and she would do a formal in-service. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. The facility failed to clean and/or remove ceiling tiles throughout the facility that a had black, moldlike substance on them. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory issues, infection, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from being physically abused by MA D who hit Resident #1 on the face during patient care on 11/10/2024. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The noncompliance began on 11/10/2024 and ended on 11/11/2024. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of experiencing and enduring abuse causing a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 2 of 2 shower rooms, in that: 1. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] had an area on tile that had soap scum and hard water stains, the shower mat was dirty with black stains, shower chair back rest had hard water stains, and under shower chair was dirty with reddish substance. 2. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] had a tile missing, the shower chair under the seat had reddish substance. This failure could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of low self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one of four quarters in 2024 (Quarter 2) reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. According to the PBJ report for Quarter 1 2024 (January 1 through March 31), the facility did not have sufficient weekend staff. This failure could place residents at risk of diminished quality of life and quality of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service. The facility failed to ensure that items stored in the walk-in in refrigerator were labeled after opened or prepared. In dry storage a dented can of tomatoes, received date 07/16/24, observed on 07/30/24 on rack with all other can goods to be used. This failure affects the residents who received meals from the kitchen and place them at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 2 of 2 shower rooms, in that 1. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] water temperature was 96.8 Degrees Fahrenheit. 2. Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] water temperature was 124.1 Degrees Fahrenheit. 3. No water temperature logs were kept. This failure could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of low self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observations & Interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident # 31) reviewed for call light. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 31's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #37) who were observed during meal service. Staff failed to ensure Resident #37 had a built-up spoon and a straw. Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #37) who were observed during meal service. Staff failed to ensure Resident #37 had a built-up spoon and a straw. This failure could affect residents who depended on assistive devices and infringe on the resident's dignity and feeding independence.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 (refrigerator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]-A) of 3 residents' refrigerators reviewed in that: The personal refrigerators in one residents' rooms contained food items which were unlabeled and undated. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which are spoiled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 (Resident #25) residents, in that: Resident #25's care plan meeting was documented as a DNR status and order was a full code status. This failure could result in residents' records not accurately documenting the administration of medications and could result in a decline in heath.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public in 1 of 3 halls (Memory Care Unit) observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to prevent three of the Memory Care Unit's chairs and sofas' exterior covering from being ripped with the interior stuffing exposed. This failure could place residents at risk of harm from furniture pieces and at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 54 of 56 weekend days reviewed for RN coverage. -The facility failed to maintain RN coverage of eight consecutive hours a day for 54 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nursing and medical needs met and receiving improper care and supervision.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 Staff (CNA D, Laundry Aide E, and MA C) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed proper infection control procedures and did not completely clean Resident #37 during incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Laundry Aide E followed PPE and infection control procedures while picking up dirty linen from the memory care to 200 hall. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA C followed proper hand hygiene and infection control procedure during medication administration. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 freezers reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer's door closed or sealed properly causing the interior of the freezer to be iced over, and water to gather on the floor outside the door after the ice melted. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to damaged foods causing a loss of nutrition and flavor, and possibly freezer burned foods.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for incontinent care. - The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed proper infection control procedures and completely clean Resident #37 during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization.
9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 5, 2025, 5 on August 2, 2024, 1 on April 14, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 30, 2026 | Fine | $10,348 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.19 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.92 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.02 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 92.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 4 |
CMS expects 3.30 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.29 on weekdays and 2.92 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.19 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.19 | 0.31 | 3.29 | 2.92 | 0.0% | 7 of 90 | 35 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.76 | 0.21 | 2.85 | 2.54 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.29 | 0.42 | 3.46 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.49 | 0.31 | 3.73 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Parkview Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Parkview Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murrell, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Way, George | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2018 | |
| Huggins, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Willig, Zachary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Weimar I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2024 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Weimar I Enterprises, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/22/2025 | |
| Blake, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Duchicela, Jorge | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/12/2025 | |
| Kelley, Kristi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/12/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.