120 State Loop 92, La Grange, TX 78945 · Fayette County · (979) 968-3144
104 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455715 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years; the largest was $8,281, and the latest is dated July 2, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
54.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation; for all medication carts reviewed for controlled drug reconciliation. The facility failed to ensure they stored and labeled 34 tablets of 5-325 Norco for Resident #1 13 tablets of 5-325 for Resident #2 and 2 tablets of Oxycodone 5mg for Resident #3. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of any significant errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 1) reviewed for medication error. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received the correct dosage of Primidone required for treating tremors. Resident #1 was given Primidone 50 mg oral tablet 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day from 12/11/2025 until 01/07/2026. The order from the hospital discharge was written as Primidone 50 mg oral tablet 2 tablet by mouth 2 times a day. The failure could place residents at risk of complications such as increased tremors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records included documentation that indicated the resident, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, receipt of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, or residents did not receive the influenza or pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Residents #14, #28 and #5) A) The facility failed to document in Resident #14's medical records for having had received education, whether by self or with responsible party, of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the pneumococcal immunization or having had not received the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure the residents, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits and risks, or potential side effects of Covid-19 immunizations, receipt of Covid-19 immunizations, or the residents did not receive the Covid-19 immunizations, due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 3 of 5 residents who were reviewed for immunizations. (Residents #14, #28 and #5) The facility failed to document in Resident #14, #28 and #5's medical records for having had received education, whether by self or with their responsible party, of the benefits and risk, and potential side effects, of the Covid-19 immunization, receipt of the of the Covid-19 immunization, or having had not received the Covid-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS system for 1 of 3 discharged residents (Resident #29) reviewed for closed records. The facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS assessment for Resident #29, who discharged on [DATE], within 14 days of the discharge date . This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for during medication passMA B failed to wash her hands prior or during medication administration to Resident #21and Resident #43. These failures could place residents at risk for developing wounds, upper respiratory infections and risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. On 04/08/2025, Resident #1 eloped from the facility through a side door and was later found by a neighbor in a grassy area approximately 219 feet away from the facility. This failure placed the resident at risk for serious harm. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The immediate jeopardy began on 04/08/2025 and ended on 04/14/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance prior to the start of the survey. The facility had implemented corrective actions and returned to compliance before the investigation began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four of eight residents (Resident # 8, Resident #18, Resident #34, and Resident #50). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 and Resident #50's facial hair was removed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 8, and Resident # 34's nails were cleaned and did not have any rough edges. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician prescribed therapeutic diet to 11 of 13 residents (Resident # 3, Resident # 9, Resident # 10, Resident # 12, Resident # 13, Resident # 22, Resident # 23, Resident # 25, Resident # 36, Resident # 156, and Resident # 207) reviewed for therapeutic diets, in that: Resident # 3, Resident # 9, Resident # 10, Resident # 12, Resident # 13, Resident # 22, Resident # 23, Resident # 25, Resident # 36, Resident # 156, and Resident # 207did not receive a mechanical soft diet as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk for choking and causing further health issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident can use the assistive device when consuming meals and snacks for 1 resident (Resident # 2) of 8 residents reviewed for assistive devices. The facility failed to provide Residents# 2's physician ordered handled cup with lid for lunch. This failure put resident at risk for decreased fluid intake, dehydration, and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure all items were labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure all items were covered and stored properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure sanitation practices were occurring in kitchen. 4. The facility failed to ensure temperature logs were being completed. These failures placed residents at risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 8 (Resident #2, Resident #11, Resident #19 and Resident #44) residents reviewed for infection control practices. 1. Business Office Manager failed to don PPE according to the facility protocol prior to entering COVID isolation. 2. The CNAs serving food trays failed to ensure Resident #44 was served his meal under safe sanitary conditions. 3. Activity Director observed assisting Resident # 11 in dining room with meal set up touching ready to eat food items with ungloved hands and without performing hand hygiene in between residents. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for one (Resident # 11) of eight residents reviewed for dignity. Resident # 11 waited 14 minutes staring at her meal tray before a staff member set down to assist with feeding Resident # 11. This failure placed residents at risk of not being treated with dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 2 (Resident # 9 and Resident #47) out of 8 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 and Resident #47's call light was within reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment; including housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for one (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure two bedside tables were cleaned daily for three days observed during annual survey. This failure placed residents at risk for infections, injuries, and demoralization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, and skills set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for one cook (Cook G) of three dietary cooks reviewed for qualified dietary staff in that: Cook G had not received onboarding training with the appropriate competencies and skills to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services department. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and place them at risk of food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to place the most recent survey readily accessible to residents in a place most frequented by residents for 9 of 9 residents reviewed for resident group meeting. The facility failed to have the survey manual readily accessible for residents to view the surveys. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights to be informed of the facility's survey citation history.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from abuse when staff yelled at her when asking for assistance via call light. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance 07/30/24. The noncompliance began on 07/22/24 and ended on 07/29/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures placed residents at risk of experiencing and enduring abuse by facility staff causing decreased quality of life. Findings Included: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #1 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents has the right to be informed of, and participate in, their treatment for one (Resident #17) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #17'ss wishes to discontinue use of Estradiol (estrogen). This failure could place residents at risk of not being part of the decision-making process for their care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident#17) reviewed for unnecessary drugs. The facility failed to ensure Estradiol (a female hormone that regulates many functions in the body, such as reproduction, mood, and bone health) was appropriate for Resident #17. Estradiol was prescribed for one documented incident of sexualized behavior which is an off-label use. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk of a possible inappropriate drug use or adverse drug reaction. hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for three (Nurse Cart 2B Hall, Med Aide Cart 1A Hall, Nurse cart 2A Hall) of four medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. Nurse Cart 2B Hall, Med Aide Cart 1A Hall and Nurse cart 2A Hall had punctured protective seals on the back of multiple narcotic medication blister pill cards. This failure could place all residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications and drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of 8 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #30). The facility failed to ensure the needle used on Resident #30, remained sterile during the procedure for intramuscular injection of the antibiotic Ceftriaxone. This failure could place residents at risk of infection, decline in health and hospitalization.
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on September 11, 2025, 1 on July 31, 2024, 2 on June 8, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 2, 2025 | Fine | $8,281 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.57 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.28 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.35 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.62 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.68 on weekdays and 2.28 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.83 in April to June 2025 to 2.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.57 | 0.59 | 2.68 | 2.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.86 | 0.54 | 3.01 | 2.49 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 58 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.85 | 0.40 | 2.99 | 2.48 | 0.0% | 6 of 92 | 57 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.83 | 0.32 | 2.96 | 2.51 | 0.0% | 2 of 91 | 58 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Monument Hill Nurse Aide Training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.7 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Monument Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.
12.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
70.3% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency IHS of La Grange LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Lucas, Denise | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Siptak, Trina | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vasquez, Raymundo | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2020 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Bridge Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Baird, Daniel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/22/2016 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2021 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Way, George | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2018 | |
| 120 State Loop 92 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Bridge Opco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency IHS of La Grange LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Winnie-Stowell Hospital District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Chudleigh, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Lucas, Denise | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Siptak, Trina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Vasquez, Raymundo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2020 | |
| 120 State Loop 92 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2018 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Reg Bridge Opco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Regency IHS of La Grange LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Winnie-Stowell Hospital District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/13/2025 | |
| Chudleigh, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2018 | |
| Lucas, Denise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Siptak, Trina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vasquez, Raymundo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.