Home / Mississippi / Okolona
Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home
512 Rockwell Drive, Okolona, MS 38860 · Chickasaw County · (662) 447-5463
73 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · Government - City/county · Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 25A162 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 8, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 18 health citations since August 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,149 in the last three years; the largest was $12,149, and the latest is dated October 3, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.30 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.07 of those hours.
56.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
October 8, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a safe and homelike environment as evidenced by a broken bathroom wall tile and a broken towel holder in the bathroom for one (1) of 67 residents' rooms observed. Resident #55Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment dated 7/29/25, revealed, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the residents can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility, both inside and outside, maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. [...]
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) status change was completed when a resident's original diagnosis was corrected to reflect the presence of a mental illness for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for PASRR. Resident #25.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff had valid and current certification to provide care to residents. This deficient practice resulted in a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) working 15 shifts while her certification was expired, which placed residents at risk of receiving care from an unqualified individual for one (1) of (44) CNA certifications reviewed. (CNA #1).
- D Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained as ordered by the physician for (1) one of five (5) resident laboratory reviews conducted. (Resident # 14).
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a functioning call light system in the bathroom for one (1) of 67 residents' rooms observed. Resident #55Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, . Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated [DATE], revealed, The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to a staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response. 7. The call system must be accessible to the residents at each toilet and bath or shower facility. The call system should be accessible to a resident lying on the floor. 8. [...]
November 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse including involuntary seclusion, verbal abuse and unreasonable confinement by staff members physically restraining a resident for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled. Resident #1.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and involuntary seclusion within the time frame required for one (1) of three (3) allegations of abuse reviewed.
October 3, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident representative (RR) interview and facility policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect as evidence by staff members calling the residents by their last name only and failing to use a salutation for two (2) of 18 residents sampled during this survey. Resident #2 and Resident #39. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy review titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity with a revision date of 10/2/23 revealed Policy: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident representative (RR) and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident representative's grievance was resolved for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed, Resident #2. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances with a revision date of 10/1/23 revealed under, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .#12. The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. On 9/30/24 at 11:20 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #2's RR revealed he has complained numerous times to the Director of Nurses (DON) and Administrator regarding his mother. [...]
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one (1) of 21 residents reviewed for MDS assessments.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff and resident interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #10 related to chronic pain for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed.
August 10, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
- G Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Residents #4, #6, #27, and #35), a resident requiring assistance with transfers using a lift (Resident #53), a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Resident #47), and a resident requiring dental services and ADLs, (Resident #34) for seven (7) of 19 resident care plans reviewed.
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from accidents during a lift transfer by using the inappropriate lift for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed for investigations.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent neglect by failing to provide goods and services to a resident to ensure that the resident received the necessary Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and oral care for one (1) of 17 residents sampled. Resident #34. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation undated revealed, Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . 6. [...]
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete the oral/dental section of the admission comprehensive assessment on a resident with dental concerns for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to remove facial hair, bathe, shave, and perform nail and oral care for residents requiring assistance with their Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for five (5) of 19 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #27, Resident #34, and Resident #35 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with a revision date of 3/10/23 revealed under, Policy: . Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. Also revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 3. [...]
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to deliver care and services for a resident with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one (1) of 66 residents reviewed. Resident #47.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide necessary dental services to meet a residents dental needs for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed. Resident #34 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Dental Services with a revision date of 3/14/23 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The dental needs of each resident are identified through the physical assessment and MDS assessment processes and are addressed in each resident's plan pf care. a. Oral/dental status shall be documented according to assessment findings. c. Referrals to dietician, speech therapist, physician, or dental provider shall be made as appropriate . [...]
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 3, 2024, 1 on August 10, 2023.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 3, 2024 | Fine | $12,149 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.30 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.07 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.61 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.92 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.30 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.6% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.2% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 2.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.57 on weekdays and 3.61 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.62 in April to June 2025 to 4.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.30 | 1.07 | 4.57 | 3.61 | 14.4% | 0 of 90 | 70 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.45 | 1.17 | 4.71 | 3.77 | 7.2% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.74 | 1.23 | 5.04 | 3.98 | 7.4% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.62 | 1.26 | 4.87 | 3.99 | 7.5% | 0 of 91 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Mississippi
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.1 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.1 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on October 8, 2025: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 10, 2023: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on October 8, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room)."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Trend Health and Rehab of Houston Houston, 15 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- River Place Nursing Center Amory, 16 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Diversicare of Amory Amory, 16.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Diversicare of Tupelo Tupelo, 16.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Tupelo Community Care Center Tupelo, 17.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Cedars Health Center Tupelo, 17.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Care Center of Aberdeen Aberdeen, 17.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Pontotoc Nursing Home Pontotoc, 21.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Mississippi State Department of Health, Health Facilities Licensure and Certification, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Mississippi Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, MDHS Division of Aging and Adult Services, 1-888-844-0041. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: MSDH Nursing Home Search, where Mississippi publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on October 8, 2025. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
- Has Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,149 in the last three years.
- Does Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.