Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center
1105 3rd Avenue Southwest, Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 · Brown County · (507) 794-7995
61 certified beds, about 51 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245225 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 6, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since May 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.88 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.87 of those hours.
56.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Monarch Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 45 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1205/24
202/25
207/25
101/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
3E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
January 6, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents (R38) reviewed for hospice.
July 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor non-pressure related skin impairments for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for skin integrity. In addition, based on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor for change in condition for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a change of condition and was admitted to the hospital with sepsis.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to apply enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) while performing cares on 1 of 3 residents (R4).
February 25, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen tank was handled safely for 1 of 1 resident (R54) reviewed for safety hazards.
- C Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure most recent survey results were readily accessible for residents or visitors to view. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility and visitors.
May 15, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 12 citations
- G Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide a method to communicate effectively with a non-English speaking resident and educate staff on identified communication needs for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for communication. This resulted in harm for R12 who suffered loneliness, depression, isolation when describing how staff failed to allow him an opportunity to communicate in a meaningful manner and did not assure that critical information could be conveyed, such as explanation of routine care, and the ability to refuse care and services. Further, the facility failed to provide sufficient guidance for staff, including temporary staff, on how to communicate and deliver care for the R12.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for cleaning and sanitizing 1 of 1 ice machines used for resident consumption. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview staff failed to ensure a mechanical transfer lift was cleaned after resident used for 1 of 1 residents (R23) observed for infection control practices. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use and hand hygiene was preformed between resident use and proper infection prevention practices was observed when sorting soiled laundry. Findings Include: Mechanical lift R23's face sheet printed 5/15/24 included diagnoses of right humerus (upper arm), diabetes mellitus and heart failure. R23's plan of care indicated assist with transfer using 2 assist and patient lift. During observation on 5/15/24 at 7:35 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D and NA-C with the assist of a mechanical lift, transferred R23 from her bed to her chair. NA-D removed the lift from the room and parked it in hallway along the wall. NA-D did not clean the lift with sanitizer. [...]
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received care and assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) as needed and requested and timely response to call lights for 11 of 20 residents (R7, R10, R13, R14, R18, R19, R24, R30, R33, R35, R47) with concerns for sufficient staffing. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 20 residents who resided on Hall 2 of the facility.
- E Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nutrient and/or calorie substantive snacks were offered after the evening meal and before bedtime, for 17 of 17 residents residing on the memory care unit and 1 of 1 resident (R14) residing on hallway 2, when there was more than a 14-hour lapse between the dinner meal and breakfast the following day.
- E Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive antibiotic stewardship program with established monitoring to help reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and reduce potential drug resistance for 12 of 20 residents (R40, R32, R35, R37, R18, R12, R45, R34, R27, R33, R23, R38) reviewed for antibiotic use. The lack of a program had potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions for communication with a Spanish speaking resident were consistently implemented to reduce alteration in psychosocial wellbeing, the risk of isolation, and barriers with communication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for (R12) communication and activities.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities and activities for a non-English speaking resident were provided for 1 of 3 residents (R12) reviewed for activities.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure weekly comprehensive skin assessments with measurements were completed for 1 of 1 resident (R35) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and/or prevent loss of range of motion (ROM) for 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R32) reviewed for limited range of motion.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for nutrition had received a mechanically altered diet per physician orders.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure BiPAP (a type of ventilator that delivers two levels of air pressure to the lungs) was utilized in accordance with physician orders to meet the individual needs for 1 of 1 resident (R38) reviewed for respiratory care and services.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 6, 2026, 3 on February 25, 2025, 1 on May 15, 2024.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.88 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.87 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.43 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.52 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.49 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.4% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.26 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.06 on weekdays and 3.43 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.91 in April to June 2025 to 3.88 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.88 | 0.87 | 4.06 | 3.43 | 22.3% | 0 of 90 | 51 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.86 | 0.96 | 4.06 | 3.36 | 29.0% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.88 | 0.82 | 4.07 | 3.39 | 18.8% | 1 of 92 | 51 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.91 | 0.89 | 4.09 | 3.46 | 20.9% | 0 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.7 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.1 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.0 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SLEEPY EYE REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Monarch Healthcare Management, a group of 45 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monarch Healthcare Operating Xiv LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/31/2023 |
| Nij LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Spartan Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Wbs Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Yazoma Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Halpert, Marc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Jaffa, Noam | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Legum, Joshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Stern, William | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Lovig, Brian | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Pearson, Nathan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Halpert, Marc | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Stern, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2023 | |
| Halpert, Marc | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 6, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.43 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Divine Providence Community Home Sleepy Eye, 1.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- St. John Lutheran Home Springfield, 12.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Oak Hills Living Center New Ulm, 12.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Gil-Mor Manor Morgan, 12.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Franklin Restorative Care Center Franklin, 17.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - St. James St. James, 22.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Living Meadows at Luther - Madelia Madelia, 22.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on January 6, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sleepy Eye Rehabilitati Center?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Monarch Healthcare Management. Legal business name: SLEEPY EYE REHABILITATION CENTER LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.