Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Sleepy Eye

Divine Providence Community Home

700 Third Avenue Northwest, Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 · Brown County · (507) 794-3011

50 certified beds, about 46 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245599 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 15, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since February 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.

34.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
1E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 15, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    F865 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure data submitted to the QAPI committee for 4 of 4 quarters submitted and reviewed, was analyzed and documented to ensure areas identified had oversight for their perspective outcomes brought forth. This had the potential to affect all 47 residents. Refer to F657 and F880.
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a system for employee surveillance based on national standards or identify specific criteria used in determining staff return to work (RTW) for 3 of 5 sampled staff (nurse aide (NA)-A, NA-B, and trained medication aide (TMA)-A).
  3. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted for 2 of 5 sampled residents' (R3 and R8) on psychotropic medications.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were appropriately developed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R3) who received anticoagulant therapy.
  5. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R4) reviewed for falls.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to weekly assess and measure a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R5).
  7. D
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    F868 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to ensure they received reports from the infection preventionist relating to employee surveillance for 4 of 4 quarters reviewed. Refer to F865 and F880Findings include: Review of the QAPI meeting minutes submitted for review identified for review of the past 4 Quarters of QAPI meeting minutes identified review of each quarter is as follows: Quarter 1 (April 2025): Attendees included the medical director, DON, RN staff development coordinator (RN-A), the pharmacist, dietary manager, facility director, vice president, maintenance supervisor, the administrator, and social services attended. Data submitted included:Infections: 18. 15 were urinary tract infections (UTI), and 3 were skin. The DON reviewed infection statistics. [...]
March 4, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a walking program to meet the assessed needs for 1 of 1 residents (R35) reviewed for restorative services.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen administration was consistently monitored according to physician orders for 2 of 4 residents (R18, R19) observed during dining.
May 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to use the appropriate type of mechanical lift sling according to the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. This resulted in harm when R1 was transferred with with a toileting sling resulting in subsequent pain, brusing and diagnosed humoral fracture to left arm.
February 14, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview staff failed to ensure a mechanical transfer lift was cleaned after resident use for 1 of 1 resident (R10), observed for infection control practices. Findings Include: R10's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for toileting, required substantial/maximal assistance with transfers, personal hygiene, and dressing and used a wheelchair for mobility . R10's care plan dated 2/12/24, indicated when R10 was transferred to use standup lift if left prosthetic was on and use the full body lift, Arjo (mechanical patient transfer device) if prosthetic was off. On 2/12/24 at 7:18 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-C removed a mechanical lift from R10's room placed the mechanical lift near a wall in the hallway. [...]
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the physician for 1 of 1 resident (R14) reviewed for nutrition when R14 showed a significant weight loss within a six-month period.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for hospice.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteReviewed- LS-done Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (toenail care) was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who was dependent upon staff for care.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 15, 2026, 4 on March 4, 2025.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · April 15, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · March 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
    K 325 · March 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.424.193.86
Registered nurses0.781.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.133.713.42
Nurse aides2.25
Licensed practical nurses0.40
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.1%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.54 on weekdays and 3.13 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 17.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.14 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.420.783.543.13 17.6%0 of 9046
Oct to Dec 20253.550.803.703.17 14.6%0 of 9246
Jul to Sep 20253.810.773.993.34 15.8%0 of 9244
Apr to Jun 20253.140.633.262.83 22.1%0 of 9146
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Divine Providence Community Home. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
24.818.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.51.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.32.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.54.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.11.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.420.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.85.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.717.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.023.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.914.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.41.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.61.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Divine Providence Community Home's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

41.9% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

13.8% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DIVINE PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HOME.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Haas, CarynCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Hubler, MargaretCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2024
Butler, RitaCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2024
Kosman, JanetCorporate officerIndividual11/13/2021
Williams, SharonCorporate officerIndividual11/13/2021
Groebner, JaynaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/26/2011
Murthy, VenkataOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/01/1995
Groebner, JaynaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/19/2025
Murthy, VenkataAdp of the SNFIndividual05/19/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.13 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Divine Providence Community Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Divine Providence Community Home 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Divine Providence Community Home get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 15, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Divine Providence Community Home been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Divine Providence Community Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Divine Providence Community Home?
CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: DIVINE PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HOME.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection