Home / South Carolina / Port Royal
1810 Richmond Avenue, Port Royal, SC 29935 · Beaufort County · (843) 781-7700
65 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2018
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425413 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 12, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 6 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,069 in the last three years; the largest was $14,069, and the latest is dated November 25, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.44 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.04 of those hours.
45.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Sprenger Health Care Systems, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 6 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, interview, record review, pharmacy contract and manufacturer's package inserts (see USP (United States Pharmacopeia)), the facility failed to ensure that medications were safely stored at the correct manufacturer/USP temperatures in 1 of 1 automated dispensing cabinet.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored appropriately in 1 of 1 kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure in-room sharps containers were locked securely to prevent residents from accessing used sharps, needles, and syringes in 3 of 4 halls observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review and manufacturer product labeling, the facility failed to ensure that medications were dated when opened and stored at correct temperatures, once opened and further failed to ensure an outdated medication was removed from active storage for 1 of 2 medication rooms and 1 of 4 medication carts.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, resident records, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident (R)1 from eloping. Specifically, R1 had a successful elopement from the facility on 11/22/25. This failure to adequately supervise has the potential to cause serious injury or death to residents. On 11/25/25 at 6:57 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template informing the facility IJ existed as of 11/22/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 11/25/25 at 8:32 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan, indicating compliance as of 11/24/25. On 11/25/25 at 9:00 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 (Resident (R)9) of 2 residents reviewed for the provision of care and services.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 25, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.44 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.04 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.51 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.3% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 31.3% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.60 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.94 in April to June 2025 to 3.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.44 | 1.04 | 3.60 | 3.03 | 8.7% | 0 of 90 | 55 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.53 | 0.97 | 3.69 | 3.13 | 4.1% | 0 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.50 | 1.03 | 3.69 | 3.03 | 9.1% | 0 of 92 | 56 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.94 | 1.08 | 4.20 | 3.26 | 8.0% | 0 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.4 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.9 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sprenger Health Care of Port Royal's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
62.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 243 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 253 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 144 eligible stays.
44.8% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 87 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
97.4% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SPRENGER HEALTHCARE OF PORT ROYAL, INC. CMS links this home to Sprenger Health Care Systems, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shcs Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/25/2016 |
| Sprenger, Nicole | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 05/25/2016 |
| Sprenger, Tracey | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 05/25/2016 |
| Fox, Emily | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Cms & Co. Management Services, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2017 | |
| Allen-Davis, Tikeshia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Courtock, Melissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2002 | |
| Derrick, Fletcher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2018 | |
| Dixon, Teresa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/12/2024 | |
| Epperly, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/20/2022 | |
| Fox, Emily | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Gollinger, Kristen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2000 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Marino-Freetage, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Micale, Jacob | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/20/2023 | |
| Hutsenpiller, Wendie | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/11/2025 | |
| Malanowski, Kenneth | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 07/11/2025 | |
| Citrin Cooperman and Company, LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/01/2025 | |
| Cms & Co. Management Services, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/31/2025 | |
| Delta Health Care Consultants, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2008 | |
| Huntington | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/07/2017 | |
| Shc of Port Royal, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/16/2015 | |
| Shc Real Estate Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/16/2015 | |
| Wellspring Staffing, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/07/2017 | |
| Allen-Davis, Tikeshia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/08/2024 | |
| Courtock, Melissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2002 | |
| Derrick, Fletcher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2018 | |
| Dixon, Teresa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/12/2024 | |
| Epperly, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/20/2022 | |
| Fox, Emily | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Gollinger, Kristen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2000 | |
| Kuhn, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Malanowki, Brandon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Marino-Freetage, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2011 | |
| Micale, Jacob | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/20/2023 | |
| Sprenger, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/16/2015 | |
| Sprenger, Tracey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/16/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.