Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation
4201 Stonegate Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76109 · Tarrant County · (817) 924-5440
134 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675759 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since August 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,801 in the last three years; the largest was $16,801, and the latest is dated October 25, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.
61.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
February 12, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined if a resident was able to self-administer medications for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20, was clinically appropriate to self-administer nasal spray that were at the resident's bedside. The failure had the potential to place residents at risk for unsafe drug administration.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary and comfortable interior for 1 of 33 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for sanitary and comfortable environment. The facility failed to maintain Resident #64's wheelchair in a sanitary condition leaving food, liquid spills, dirt, and debris to collect down both sides of the wheelchair when observed on 02/10/26. This failure could place residents at risk of contamination and infections.
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident quarterly (every 3 months) using the MDS form specified by the state and approved by CMS for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #56's quarterly MDS assessment was completed within three months from the previous assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving inappropriate care for their conditions.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for nutritional status. The facility failed to recognize, evaluate, and address timely interventions and prevent weight loss when Resident #21 experienced severe weight loss of 6.48% (8 pounds) from 01/12/26 to 02/12/26. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care, weight loss, malnutrition, and overall health decline.
February 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 medication carts (200 Hall) and 2 of 2 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall nurses' medication cart had accurate narcotic counts for Residents #1 and #2. This failure could place residents at risk for medication errors, drug diversion, and delay in medication administration.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had access to his call light. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to call for help when needed.
January 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure food temperatures were checked on 01/03/25 while on the steam table before serving residents between 7:00 AM to 8:30 AM. These failures could place residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for two (Medication Cart #1 and Medication Cart #2) of four medication carts and nurses' station counter (Hall 200- East Station) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to lock Medication Cart #1 and Medication Cart #2 on 01/02/25, leaving all medications on the cart accessible on Hall 100 (West Station). 2. The facility failed to secure medications on the nurses' station counter on Hall 200 (East Station) on 01/03/25 at 5:30 AM. These failures could place residents at risk for drug diversions.
October 25, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
- K Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #34 and #3) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 had the right to be free from abuse when she was verbally and mentally abused by the Weekend Activities Assistant on 07/14/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had the right to be free from abuse when he was verbally and mentally abused by CNA U on 07/08/24. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 07/08/24 and ended on 07/14/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. These failures placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm.
- K Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect of residents for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #34 and #3) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #34 from retaliation after the Weekend Activities Assistant was suspended based on an allegation of abuse on 07/14/24. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from verbal and mental abuse by CNA U on 07/08/24. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 07/08/24 and ended on 07/14/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. These failures placed residents at risk of ongoing abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm.
- J Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were reported to the facility Administrator immediately but no later than 2 hours for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to immediately notify their Abuse Coordinator (the Former Administrator) when the Weekend Activities Assistant had yelled at Resident #34 at the nurse's station in front of other residents and staff on 07/14/24. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 07/14/24 and ended on 07/14/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure placed residents at risk of continued abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm.
- E Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of 2 of 23 residents (Residents #41 and #239) observed. The facility failed to have an adequate supply of milk for all residents. This failure had the potential to affect all facility residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #74) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74's fingernails were cleaned and cut. This failure could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for respiratory therapy. LVN Y failed to ensure Resident #8's nasal cannula was changed and dated according to doctor's orders on 10/20/24. This failure could lead to respiratory infections, poor air quality, and not having their respiratory requirements met.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, the facility stored all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 5 carts (100 Hall Nurse cart) reviewed for storage. LVN C failed to secure the nurse medication cart for 100 Hall. This failure could place residents at risk of obtaining medications not prescribed to them.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for the lunch meal for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet were served pureed bread and pureed angel food cake during the lunch meal on 10/23/24. This failure could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss, hunger, and metabolic imbalances.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for food consistency. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's pureed carrots were free of whole slices of carrots. This failure placed all residents, especially those with swallowing issues, at risk of aspirating or choking.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for accuracy of clinical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN Y accurately documented on Resident #8's TAR that her nasal cannula was not changed on 10/20/24 as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate medical records that could affect monitoring and medical services provided.
August 31, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 2 (Resident #30 and Resident #73) of 18 residents observed for medication storage. 1. Resident #30 had 1 bottle of Tums pills stored at the resident's bedside table not locked in a lock box or secured in the medication cart or medication room. 2. Resident #73 had unidentified cream at her bedside table and unidentified pills in a plastic cup on her bed not locked in a lock box or secured in the mediation cart or mediation room. This failure could place residents at risk of overmedication or adverse drug reactions.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings for 2 (Resident #65 and Resident #37) of 6 residents reviewed for enteral nutrition, in that: 1. The facility failed to appropriately label formula bag for Resident #65. 2. The facility failed to follow Resident #37's physician orders for enteral feeding. These failures could affect residents receiving enteral nutrition/hydration and place them at risk of health complications and decline in health.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #37) of 7 resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to follow the physician orders for Resident #37's oxygen. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of respiratory complications.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #37) of 18 residents records reviewed for treatment documentation. 1. LVN B documented Resident #37 had been connected to her g-tube feedings at 1PM but resident was not connected to her g-tube feedings until 3PM. 2. LVN C documented Resident #37 had been receiving oxygen therapy, but observation revealed resident was not receiving oxygen therapy. These failures could affect the residents medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs.
Fire safety inspections
18 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 12, 2026, 3 on October 25, 2024, 10 on August 31, 2023.
Every fire safety citation18 citations
- F Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- F Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 25, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.45 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 61.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.86 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.62 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.45 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.45 | 0.63 | 3.62 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.60 | 3.47 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.81 | 0.57 | 3.96 | 3.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.80 | 0.48 | 4.01 | 3.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2020 | |
| Way, George | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2013 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2021 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Way, George | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2013 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Stonegate, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2021 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/04/2021 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2021 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Way, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 20, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 3, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center Fort Worth, 1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Renaissance Park Multi Care Center Fort Worth, 2.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Fort Worth Transitional Care Center Fort Worth, 2.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- The Stayton at Museum Way Fort Worth, 3.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Ridgmar Medical Lodge Fort Worth, 3.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Dfw Nursing & Rehab Fort Worth, 3.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center Fort Worth, 3.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC Fort Worth, 3.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 12, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,801 in the last three years.
- Does Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Hmg Healthcare. Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.