The Stayton at Museum Way
2501 Museum Way, Fort Worth, TX 76107 · Tarrant County · (817) 632-3600
46 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2011
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676305 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 24, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.64 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.87 of those hours.
37.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
July 22, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an admissions policy that did not request or require residents to waive potential facility liability for loss of personal property for 2 of 2 residents (Resident's #1 and #2) reviewed for loss of personal property. The facility failed to ensure the admission agreement did not request or require residents to waive potential facility liability for losses of personal property. This could place residents at risk of misappropriation of their personal property.
November 24, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispending, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 medication cart (Hall B cart) and 1 medication room (Hall A) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired multivitamin with zinc, with a date of 08/2025 in the Hall B nurse cart, and 2 bottles of expired multivitamin with an expiration date of 05/2025, 1 bottle of multivitamin with an expiration date of 08/2025, 3 bottles of niacin with an expiration date of 09/2025, and a box of bisacodyl suppositories with an expiration date of 06/2025 in the Hall A medication room were removed and destroyed. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving expired medications that were ineffective.
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) whose drug regimens were reviewed. The facility failed to act upon the Pharmacy Consultant's recommendations issued on 07/21/25, 08/19/25, and 09/22/25 to add a 14-day stop date for Resident #5's use of PRN Lorazepam, which is a psychotropic medication used for the treatment of anxiety disorders and severe agitation. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for adverse consequences and could cause a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial condition.
- E Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not given a psychotropic drug unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for unnecessary medications, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was prescribed a psychotropic drug for anxiety no longer than 14 days PRN. Resident #5 was ordered PRN Lorazepam (a benzodiazepine medication used primarily to treat anxiety disorders and severe agitation) on 07/19/25 without a stop date. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications.
January 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. CNA A neglected Resident #1 safety and well-being when he placed a skeleton in the resident's doorway, which startled the resident and caused her to fall sustaining a skin tear and bruising on her buttocks. 2. The facility neglected to put measures in place to monitor Resident #2 after the resident injested medications, Fioricet (a barbituate used for headaches), that belonged to a family member. This resulted in the resident being unresponsive and going to the hopsital where she received IV fluids. The family member continued to visit four more times after this incident. These failures could result in residents receiving injuries.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately to the state survey agency but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect when Resident #2 was found to have taken barbituates (Fioricet [used to treat headaches]) that belonged to a family member, which resulted in the resident being unresponsive and being sent to the hospital where she received IV fluids. This failure could place the resident at risk of continued abuse.
October 27, 2024Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinence care. The facility they failed to monitor and document signs and symptoms of bowel movements for Resident#1. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and a decreased quality of life.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to assure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, for 1 of 3 medication carts (medication cart #1) observed for medication storage. On 10/27/24 at 6:08 PM, RN A failed to ensure medications were secured or attended to by authorized staff when RN A did not lock medication cart #1. On 10/27/24 at 6:08 PM, RN A failed to ensure medications were secured or attended to by authorized staff when RN A left a medication cup with two pills and a resident's medication blister pack with pills on top of the medication cart unattended. These failures place residents at risk of a potential for more than minimal harm if a resident accessed and ingested medications or drug diversion.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide needed care and services that are resident centered, in accordance with the resident's preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for wounds. 1. RN A failed to remove the semi-occulsive dressing (a type of wound dressing that allows air to pass through while protecting the wound from liquids) that secured the negative pressure wound therapy ([NPWT] - wound vac) suction device and tubing over the wound. RN A pulled on the suction device and tubing to remove the old dressing that caused Resident #2 pain and discomfort on 10/26/24. 2. RN A failed to follow the facility's general procedure for wound vac dressing change on 10/26/24. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering medications for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration. RN A failed to administer medications as ordered. RN A informed Resident #3 that he mixed Miralax (brand name of an over-the-counter powder that treats occasional constipation [generic name: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350]) with cranberry juice per Resident #3's request to relieve constipation. Resident #3 did not have an order for Miralax (or generic version). The facility failed to ensure RN A contacted the physician to obtain an order for a medication before administration. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases and infections 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. RN A failed to follow facility protocol and don a gown in addition to gloves to reduce the risk of transmission of bloodborne pathogens and apply enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when he performed wound vac dressing change to Resident #2's right knee on 10/26/24. 2. RN A re-used the wound vac disposable components (suction device and tubing) when he performed wound vac dressing change to Resident #2's right knee on 10/26/24. [...]
September 6, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Resident #8, Resident #21, and Resident #143) of thirteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #8, Resident #21, and Resident #143's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three (Resident #29, Resident #142, and Resident #144) of eight residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #29's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #142 had an order for CPAP and her nasal pillow mask (a small, soft, cushioned inserts that rests at the entrance of the nose) for CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open) was stored properly. 3. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure expired foods in the facility's refrigerator and freezer were discarded according to guidelines. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator and freezer were properly sealed from air-borne contaminations. 3. The Executive Chef, Cook, and Culinary Aide failed to properly wear a hair and beard covering while breakfast was being prepared and served, in the kitchen area. 4. The facility failed to clean the food storage bins in the dry food storage area. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in an environment that enhanced his or her quality of life for 2 (Resident #19 and #24) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #19 and #24 with dignity and enhance their quality of life when the residents were not provided a privacy bag for their catheter bag (drainage bag outside of the body that collects urine). This failure placed residents at risk of not having their right to dignity maintained.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #142) of seven residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #142's Comprehensive MDS Assessment accurately reflected that Resident #142 was using a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, for diminished function of health, and for regressions in their overall health.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #142) of seven residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #142 was care planned for CPAP. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident right that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #23) of 6 residents reviewed for Care Plan reassessment and revisions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's care plan included the resident receiving a dietary supplement (Ensure), twice daily based on a comprehensive nutritional assessment completed by the dietician on 08/16/24. This failure could place the resident at risk for excessive weight loss.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received additional nutrition resources, based on comprehensive assessments reviewed for 1 (Resident #23) of 4 residents reviewed for assisted nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 received her Ensure shake twice daily, based on a dietary comprehensive assessment completed by the Dietitian on 08/16/24. This failure placed the resident at risk of unnecessary weight loss or slowing a diagnosis that causes weight loss.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #7 and Resident #145) of eight residents observed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure that CNA C changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #7. 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #145. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
January 10, 2024Complaint inspection, Infection control · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program with a system for preventing, identifying, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, visitors, and other individuals providing services based upon national standards for 1 (A-Tower) of 2 halls reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to have an effective protocol in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 that followed nationally accepted standards for contact tracing testing or broad-based testing after CNA A tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/29/23. The facility had not implemented testing on days 1, 3, or 5 to identify others who may have been exposed. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection.
August 10, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #23) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's (two tubings) and Resident #23's (one tubing) nasal cannula tubing were dated. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their respiratory needs met.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerator, and freezer were stored and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure that staff was wearing the proper head and face coverings when serving food. The facility failed to ensure proper discarding of expired food stored in the refrigerator and freezer storage area. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #188) of 1 resident who is fed by enteral means, received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (Resident #188) of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feeding. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #188's feeding bag was dated as per facility' policy. This failure could place the residents at risk for nutritional problems.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that the two prongs of Resident #4's nasal cannula (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to an individual. It consists of a lightweight tube on which one is connected to the oxygen source and the other end splits into two prongs and are placed in the nostrils) was off the floor and not touching any surface when not in use. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections.
Fire safety inspections
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on August 10, 2023.
Every fire safety citation1 citation
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.64 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.87 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.12 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.86 on weekdays and 4.12 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.76 in April to June 2025 to 4.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.64 | 0.87 | 4.86 | 4.12 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 42 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.69 | 1.04 | 4.90 | 4.15 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.62 | 1.20 | 4.86 | 4.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.76 | 1.02 | 5.04 | 4.05 | 6.9% | 0 of 91 | 40 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: TARRANT COUNTY SENIOR LIVING CENTER, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tarrant County Senior Living Center, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2024 |
| Buckner Retirement Services Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2024 |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Corporate director | Individual | 04/21/2025 | |
| Buckner Retirement Services Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Moore, Jessica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/12/2012 | |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/25/2025 | |
| Eady, Lisa | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Lancaster, Ivan | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Buckner Retirement Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Tarrant County Senior Living Center, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Moore, Jessica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/12/2012 | |
| Robbins, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/21/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on October 27, 2024: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 24, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on October 27, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 22, 2026: "Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Trinity Terrace Fort Worth, 0.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- James L. West Center for Dementia Care Fort Worth, 0.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Fort Worth Transitional Care Center Fort Worth, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center Fort Worth, 1.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC Fort Worth, 1.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Dfw Nursing & Rehab Fort Worth, 1.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center Fort Worth, 2.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation Fort Worth, 3.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is The Stayton at Museum Way's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Stayton at Museum Way 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Stayton at Museum Way get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 24, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has The Stayton at Museum Way been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Stayton at Museum Way accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns The Stayton at Museum Way?
- CMS lists 12 owners and managers. Legal business name: TARRANT COUNTY SENIOR LIVING CENTER, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.