Swan Health at Wichita Falls
1101 Grace Street, Wichita Falls, TX 76301 · Wichita County · (940) 322-3393
72 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455901 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 14 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.20 of those hours.
CMS links it to The Carpenter Health Network, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
May 7, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of QAPI training requirements for 10 of 16 (MD, LVN A, RN B, RN C, LVN D, CNA E, CNA F, RT G, MAINT H, DA I) employees reviewed for QAPI training. The facility failed to ensure the MD, LVN A, RN B, RN C, LVN D, CNA E, CNA F, RT G, MAINT H, and DA I were trained for QAPI. These failures could place residents at risk of receiving care from incompetent/untrained staff.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 facility Dietary Kitchen reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to repair damaged ceiling in Dietary Kitchen, damaged ceiling located over clean pot storage rack. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unsanitary, and unsafe. Observation on 05/05/2026 at 8:40 AM, revealed the ceiling in dietary kitchen was damaged by water leaking from roof. Location of damaged ceiling was on the north wall over clean pot rack. The damaged area to the ceiling measured 14 inches long with an opening of 1.5 inches at its widest part. Interview on 05/06/2026 at 11:50 AM, Dietary Manager said he had not seen the crack in ceiling before. [...]
March 20, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #294 and Resident #295) reviewed for advanced directives. 1. The facility failed to complete Resident #294's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH DNR) on admission or in a timely manner. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #295's code status was documented on admission or in a timely manner. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not having their wishes known, which could affect whether they receive emergency medical treatment.
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of12 Residents (Resident #8, Resident #5, and Resident #35) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to ensure the MDS reflected the use of bed rails for Resident #8, Resident #5 and Resident #35. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care for identified care needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure DA A performed hand hygiene while preparing resident food trays. This failure could place residents at risk for contamination and food borne illnesses.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person -centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #5 and #26) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #5's use of bedrails. 2. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #26's ostomy care. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days, except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #37) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 did not have an order for alprazolam ([Xanax] a benzodiazepine medication) 1 mg by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety disorder beyond 14 days. , This failure could place residents at risk of adverse side effects from prolonged use of psychotropic medications.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 12 (Resident # 6) residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's physician orders contained orders for the care of Resident # 6's ostomy. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment.
January 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for residents requiring ventilation via a tracheostomy tube (a surgically created hole with a tube inserted into the windpipe to provide an alternative airway for breathing) that resided on the vent unit. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk for cross contamination and infections.
February 9, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate and maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program that focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility failed to have documentation and evidence of its QAPI plan being ongoing and comprehensive. The facility had not implemented Performance Improvement Projects to address resident quality of care concerns. This failure could place the residents at risk for a decreased quality of care and decreased quality of life within their living environment.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 hours of annual in-service training was provided to ensure continuing competency for 2 of 6 CNAs (CNA B and CNA C) whose records were reviewed for completion of in-service training, in that: 1. CNA B was hired for employment on 1/27/2023. She completed 8.5 hours of annual in-service training. 2. CNA C was hired for employment on 5/25/2021. She completed 8 hours of annual in-service training. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving quality care and services to meet their physical and psychosocial needs within their living environment.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of5esident (Resident #5) reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene before and during incontinent care for Resident #5. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for cross contamination and/or acquiring an infection.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information which included the total number and actual hours worked by licensed nurses and certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift for 1 of 1 day reviewed. 1. The facility posted a daily nurse staffing form that documented the day of the week, date, resident census, and the first names of the direct care staff licensed nurses and certified nurse aides and their assigned hall location for each of two shifts, 6 AM - 6 PM and 6 PM - 6 AM for 2/09/2024. 2. The daily nurse staffing form did not include the name of the facility and did not document the number of staff scheduled to work and the actual hours worked by the staff for each shift for 2/09/2024. [...]
November 4, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that all nursing staff possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the resident's needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nursing practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN A had the competency to retrieve a physician order before performing an invasive examination. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began 10/18/23 and ended on 10/27/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place the residents at risk of physical and psychosocial harm.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 7, 2026, 2 on March 20, 2025, 1 on February 9, 2024.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Ensure precautions for handling oxygen cylinders and equipment are correctly followed.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.24 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.04 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.43 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.61 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 5.21 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.32 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.50 in April to June 2025 to 3.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.24 | 0.20 | 3.32 | 3.04 | 7.1% | 0 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.76 | 0.41 | 3.87 | 3.49 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.21 | 0.85 | 5.43 | 4.66 | 0.0% | 8 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.50 | 0.62 | 4.68 | 4.03 | 8.3% | 0 of 91 | 36 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 41.5 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 30.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SWAN HEALTH AT WICHITA FALLS LLC. CMS links this home to The Carpenter Health Network, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pcm Rehab Enterprises LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 80% | 08/01/2025 |
| Mayeaux, Rachel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 08/01/2025 |
| Rambin, Patrick | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Pcm Holdings I, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 80% | 08/01/2025 |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Cam-Grace, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Boyer, Micah | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Foley, Linda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mayeaux, Rachel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Rambin, Patrick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Sananikone, Ashley | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| St. Joseph Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| Foley, Linda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Rambin, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Holleman, Emily | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/04/2025 | |
| Mitchell, Kelly | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 09/03/2025 | |
| Cam-Grace, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2025 | |
| St. Joseph Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/05/2025 | |
| Boyer, Micah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Foley, Linda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mayeaux, Rachel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Mitchell, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| Rambin, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 9, 2024: "Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Midwestern Healthcare Center Wichita Falls, 2.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Senior Care Health & Rehabilitation Center - Wichi Wichita Falls, 2.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Texhoma Christian Care Center Inc Wichita Falls, 2.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Rolling Meadows Wichita Falls, 3.1 mi · not rated · 0 citations
- Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita Wichita Falls, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- University Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Wichita Falls, 4.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Sheridan Medical Lodge Burkburnett, 12.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Avir at Burkburnett Burkburnett, 14.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Swan Health at Wichita Falls's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Swan Health at Wichita Falls 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Swan Health at Wichita Falls get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 7, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Swan Health at Wichita Falls been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Swan Health at Wichita Falls accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Swan Health at Wichita Falls?
- CMS lists 26 owners and managers, and links the home to The Carpenter Health Network. Legal business name: SWAN HEALTH AT WICHITA FALLS LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.