Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Wichita Falls

Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita

4810 Kemp Blvd., Wichita Falls, TX 76308 · Wichita County · (940) 766-0281

180 certified beds, about 168 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675852 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 6, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.43 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.

42.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Advanced Healthcare Solutions, an affiliated group of 28 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
6E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
2C
June 27, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed for 1 of 1 facility for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to follow the meal posted for lunch or dinner. The facility failed to post and follow the current week's menu in the dietary department. The facility failed to post the current week's menu where the residents can see it. This failure could result in the lack of knowledge and lead to nutritional, physical, and psychosocial upset.
  2. C
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    F844 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 10, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice to the State Agency responsible for licensing the facility at the time of change, for a change in the facility's administrator for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for administration. The facility failed to notify the State Agency of a change in the facilities administrator within 30 days. This failure could result in the lack of knowledge and inability to connect with the appropriate leadership of the facility.
March 6, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that:1. Dietary Aide D was wearing gloves while rinsing dirty dishes and loading the dish racks for the dish machine. He stated he washed his gloves (gloved hands) before touching the clean dishes.2. The walk-in freezer had rack shelf units with open cardboard boxes/cases with bagged food items open to the air and not sealed - 1 box with enchiladas; 2 boxes with meat patties.3. The deep fryer units interior surfaces were soiled with dried and fried food crumbs and breading crumbs.4. The reach-in refrigerator had a square plastic container labeled and dated as lemon pudding 3/02/2026. The lid was warped and did not securely fit the container.5. [...]
June 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to readmit the resident, when the hearing officer determines that the discharge was inappropriate, the facility, uopn written notification by the hearing officer, must readmit the resident immediately, or to the next availble bed. The facility failed to readmit (Resident #1) of two Residents reviewed for discharge requirement. 1) The facility failed and refused to readmit Resident #1 from the hospital where she was transferred for evaluation and treatment. 2) The facility did not permit resident to return to the facility after the appeal ruled the facility must reverse their decision to discharge the resident. 3) The facility did not permit Resident #1 to remain in the facility for 30 days after giving her 30-day discharge notice as required. [...]
February 28, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mistreatment, (Resident #1). On 02/02/25 at 1:00 pm, LVN A began arguing with Resident #1. LVN A continued arguing after being asked to stop by other staff repeatedly, and continued to anger and upset Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for resident mistreatment.
  2. D
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2 reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to readmit Resident #2 after being admitted to the hospital, while facility initiated discharge was Pending Appeal. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. .
December 6, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 4 of 4 staff members (ADM, DON, ADON and CNA B) reviewed for abuse protocol. The facility failed to complete annual Criminal Background Checks for the ADM, DON, ADON and CNA B. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  2. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of medication error rates of five percent or greater. There were 4 medication errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 14% involving 4 of 10 residents (Resident #s #151, #113, #39, & #80) reviewed for medication errors. A. On 12/4/24 at 11:29 am, LVN A administered Micafungin Sodium IV to a Resident #151 at the incorrect physician ordered administration time. B. On 12/4/24 at 11:38 am, LVN A failed to prime the insulin needle prior to administering Novolog 100 units/ml via a Flex Pen to Resident #113. C. On 12/4/24 at 11:44 am, LVN A failed to prime the insulin needle prior to administering Humalog 100 units/ml via a Flex Pen to Resident #39. D. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an appetizing temperature meal for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for meal palatability. The facility failed to serve meals at palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature for residents #105, #25 and #27 served their meals in their rooms. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for malnutrition due to not providing appetizing temperature meal.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 33 residents (Residents #39) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN A donned (put on) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), as required for residents who were on transmission-based precautions (TBP), when she entered Resident #39's room. This failure could place residents at risk for infections.
May 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement care interventions in accordance with each resident's written plan of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #s 1) whose care was reviewed in that: The facility failed to implement ADL transfer interventions for Resident #1 as care planned. This failure could affect residents that required assistance with transfers.
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #s 1) whose care was reviewed in that: The facility failed to implement ADL transfer interventions for Resident #1 . This failure could affect residents that required assistance with transfers.
April 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    F839 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed for 1 of 41 nursing staff (Staff A) reviewed. Staff A's LVN license had not been renewed as of [DATE] causing her LVN license to be delinquent. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having receiving care from unlicensed staff to provide proper medical care.
January 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide A wore effective hair restraints while preparing lunch. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for food borne illness.
November 17, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately relected the resident's status for 1 of 11 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to address skin conditions under Section M (Skin Conditions) : This failure could place residents at risk of worsening of skin conditions.
  2. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding which included but not limited to aspiration, pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for one of 1 resident (Resident #) reviewed for enteral nutrition. RN D failed to check placement of Resident #17's g-tube before starting the medication administration via g-tube feeding as required to avoid medical complications. This failure could place residents at risk for aspiration pneumonia and ineffective medication absorption.
  3. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 9 of 9 residents (Residents #40, #33, #36, #130, #68, #49, #26, #124 and #145) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to accurately monitor and document controlled drugs for 9 residents with medications stored on 1 of 4 Medication carts (2300 hall medication cart) reviewed for narcotic reconciliation. This failure could place residents at risk of medication overdose, medication under-dose, and ineffective therapeutic outcomes, and drug diversion.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 medication carts (2300 hall med cart) reviewed for medication storage . The facility failed to ensure the 2300 hall medication cart did not contain loose pills. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect medications or ineffective therapeutic doses.
  5. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's electronic record reflected the residents skin conditions including the appearance, and treatment. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening skin integrity and decline in comfort level .
  6. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift that was in a clear and readable format and in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 4 reviewed for nursing services. 4 The facility failed to update and post the daily nurse staffing information on 11/17/2023. This failure could place residents at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 6, 2024, 2 on November 17, 2023.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. F
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · December 6, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · December 6, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · December 6, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.433.393.86
Registered nurses0.520.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.002.983.42
Nurse aides2.12
Licensed practical nurses0.80
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)42.6%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover35.3%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 4.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.61 on weekdays and 3.00 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.27 in April to June 2025 to 3.43 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.430.523.613.00 0.0%0 of 90168
Oct to Dec 20253.340.443.482.99 0.0%0 of 92169
Jul to Sep 20253.210.363.362.85 0.0%0 of 92171
Apr to Jun 20253.270.373.452.82 0.0%0 of 91167
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.115.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.60.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.33.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.314.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.63.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.69.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.625.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.912.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.12.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

51.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 259 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

12.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 296 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 178 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

54.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 219 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 219 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

98.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Advanced Healthcare Solutions, a group of 28 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Weary, AnthonyW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2022
Hooper, GradyCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2022
Texas SNF Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 27, 2026: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 6, 2024: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 10, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 27, 2026: "Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on March 6, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Wichita?
CMS lists 3 owners and managers, and links the home to Advanced Healthcare Solutions. Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection