Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation
884 Hwy 84 W, Teague, TX 75860 · Freestone County · (254) 739-2541
76 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675884 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 26, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.27 of those hours.
46.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Gulf Coast LTC Partners, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
110/23
104/24
108/24
111/24
201/26
202/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 26, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #5's call light was within reach on 02/24/26. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for Resident #2 due to MDS assessment reflected resident did not receive anti-anxiety medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided.
January 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from verbal sexual harassment by CNA A in November of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of ongoing sexual harassment, psychosocial harm, fear, and decreased quality of life. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/20/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for abuse and neglect. [...]
November 26, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 (Resident #24, Resident #14, Resident #11, and Resident #86) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA C and CNA D failed to wash their hands and change their gloves when removing a soiled brief and placing a clean brief during peri care observation for Resident #11. LVN A placed soiled linens and dressing on the Resident #86's floor during wound care. CNA B and LVN A failed to change their gloves or cleanse their hands when removing a dirty brief and placing a clean brief on Resident #86. [...]
August 29, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observatations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contain an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress, including his/her response to treatments and/or services, and changes in his/her condition for 1of 7 residents (Resident #1) review for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Weekly Nursing Summary dated 08/14/24, 08/21/24 & 08/28/2024 reflected that Resident #1 had an indwelling catheter. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for inadequate care due to an inaccurate assessment.
April 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's weekly skin assessments were performed timely, accurately, and appropriately. This failure could place residents at risk of missing treatment needs.
October 12, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 ( Resident # 26) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. LVN B failed to perform hand hygiene while performing wound and incontient care for Resident #26. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 26, 2026, 1 on November 26, 2024.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.07 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.27 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.79 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.55 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.26 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.7% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.79 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.11 in April to June 2025 to 3.07 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.07 | 0.27 | 3.19 | 2.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.15 | 0.29 | 3.31 | 2.76 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 34 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.98 | 0.22 | 3.15 | 2.55 | 2.9% | 2 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.11 | 0.26 | 3.28 | 2.69 | 2.9% | 0 of 91 | 33 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Gulf Coast LTC Partners, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Limestone Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2018 |
| Fky 2 Teague, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Price, Larry | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Teague LTC Partners Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Bergeron, Bobby | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Nicholson, Louis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Fky 2 Teague, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Davidson, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/26/2021 | |
| White, Darryl | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 20, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 26, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 26, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.79 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Fairfield Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Fairfield, 9.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Fairview Healthcare Residence Fairfield, 10.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Skilled Care of Mexia Mexia, 10.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- The Manor Healthcare Residence Mexia, 11.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Mexia LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation Mexia, 11.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Groesbeck LTC Nursing and Rehabilitation Groesbeck, 15.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Windsor Healthcare Residence Groesbeck, 16.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 26, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 9 owners and managers, and links the home to Gulf Coast LTC Partners. Legal business name: SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.