Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Mexia

Skilled Care of Mexia

501 E Sumpter St., Mexia, TX 76667 · Limestone County · (254) 472-0630

80 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2017

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676427 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 17, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since April 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,634 in the last three years; the largest was $15,521, and the latest is dated October 17, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.26 of those hours.

97.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
2K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
October 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of one (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to prevent the elopement of Resident #1 on 10/5/2025. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The immediate jeopardy began on 10/16/2025 at 5:22 p.m. and ended on 10/17/2025 at 5:58 p.m. The facility had corrected noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents and harm.
July 17, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents [TF1] (Resident # 18, Resident #83, and Resident #37) and two of Two staff (interviewed and reviewed for infection control. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents Resident # 18, Resident #83, and Resident #37) and two of Two staff (interviewed and reviewed for infection control. [...]
December 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. K
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and times to meet a resident's need for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed monitor Resident #1's monthly weights. 2. The facility failed to develop, and implement, a person-centered intervention for Resident #1's severe weight loss that began on 8/24/2024. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 08/24/2024 and ended on 11/18/2024. The facility had implemented actions that corrected the deficient practice prior to the beginning of the investigation. This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of malnutrition.
  2. K
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to unsure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutritional status. The facility failed to identify Resident #1's severe weight loss at a 30-day, 90-day, and 180-day increment on 8/24/2024, 9/2/2024, 10/2/2024, and 11/5/2024. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 08/24/2024 and ended on 11/18/2024. The facility had implemented actions that corrected the deficient practice prior to the beginning of the investigation. This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of malnutrition.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' assessments accurately reflected the residents' statuses for 1 of 5 Resident (Resident#1) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to identify Resident #1's severe weight loss on a Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/4/2024, at 180 day look back increment. This failure could place residents at the facility at risk of malnutrition.
May 30, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain the residents' right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #20) reviewed for resident rights, in that: On 05/29/24 CNA A failed to knocked or requested permission before entering Resident #20's room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of psychosocial harm due to diminished self-image and could place residents needing assistance at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth.
  2. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure one medication PPD (total of 1 vial) were not dated with opened date in the medication storage room refrigerator. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 31, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form to meet individual needs for 1 of 8 (Resident #20) residents observed for dietary needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 received food that was in a form to meet Resident 20's needs. This failure could contribute to causing a resident to choke and poor food intake.
April 30, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not remove Resident #1's call light and beside table from within her reach which prevented the resident from calling for assistance when needed. This failure could place residents at risk of being neglected by staff if they were unable to call for assistance when needed. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 3/20/2024 and ended on 3/27/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.
April 6, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for three of fifteen residents (Resident # 39, Resident # 57 and Resident #10) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 39's, Resident #57's and Resident #10's nails were trimmed and cleaned. These failures placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues and decreased quality of life.
  2. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to provide a system of medication records that enables periodic accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications for 2 of 2 medication carts that were reviewed for pharmacy services. This failure could place the residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects from controlled narcotics due to from controlled narcotics did not reconcile every shift.
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 2 of 8 Residents (Resident #39 and Resident # 58) reviewed for call lights in that: Resident #39 and Resident #58 were observed in their rooms with their call lights not in reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #3 & #37) reviewed for resident assessment and care screening. Facility failed to accurately complete the minimum data set for Resident #3's and Resident #37's oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents' rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #3 & #37) reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident #3's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's use of oxygen. 2. Resident #37's comprehensive care plan did not address the resident's use of oxygen. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions that were not individualized to their care needs.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice one (Resident #39) of two oxygen concentrators reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to change nasal cannula tubing of Resident #39 as ordered by the physician. This failure could affect the resident by increasing the risk of respiratory infection.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one resident (#35) of two residents observed for infection control in that: After using the blood pressure machine on Resident #55, CMA D did not sanitize the Blood pressure machine prior to placing the blood pressure machine on Resident #35 to measure blood pressure. This deficient practice could place the facility's residents at risk of infection while having their blood pressure taken in the facility and could result in cross contamination of germs.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 17, 2025, 2 on May 30, 2024, 1 on April 6, 2023.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. F
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · July 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · July 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 30, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 30, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · April 6, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 17, 2025Fine $9,113
December 31, 2024Fine $15,521

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.173.393.86
Registered nurses0.260.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.862.983.42
Nurse aides2.02
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)97.2%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover88.9%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.29 on weekdays and 2.86 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.30 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.170.263.292.86 0.0%0 of 9070
Oct to Dec 20253.280.283.392.97 0.0%0 of 9274
Jul to Sep 20253.160.323.242.95 0.0%0 of 9268
Apr to Jun 20253.300.373.442.95 0.0%0 of 9169
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Skilled Care of Mexia. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.115.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.40.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.814.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.63.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.19.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
32.625.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.412.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.82.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.12.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Skilled Care of Mexia's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

57.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

57.7% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.7% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Huggins, LindaW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/01/2022
Mak, DavidCorporate officerIndividual05/17/2021
Mexia II Enterprises, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/2022
Blake, GaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2022
Blake, MalisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on October 17, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 31, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 30, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.86 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Skilled Care of Mexia's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Skilled Care of Mexia 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Skilled Care of Mexia get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on July 17, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Skilled Care of Mexia been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $24,634 in the last three years.
Does Skilled Care of Mexia accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Skilled Care of Mexia?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers, and links the home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare. Legal business name: WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection