The Estates at Greeley LLC
313 South Greeley Street, Stillwater, MN 55082 · Washington County · (651) 439-5775
64 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245342 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 2, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.
54.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Monarch Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 45 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
609/23
106/24
808/24
303/25
106/25
307/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
19D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
July 2, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered passive range of motion (ROM) exercises were completed for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for range of motion.
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to identify and appropriately monitor target behaviors for 1 of 1 residents (R22) reviewed for mood and behavior.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff used enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents (R6) reviewed who required EBP.
June 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions to reduce fall risk were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (R4 and R2) reviewed for falls.
March 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report (within two hours) allegations of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for allegations of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated to include interventions to address relationships and behaviors for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse prevention.
August 7, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were utilized for 1 of 1 residents (R98) who required contact precautions for clostridium difficile (C. diff, a highly contagious infection). Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and appropriate hand hygiene was used for 1 of 1 residents (R20) observed during personal cares.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 resident (R37).
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed under a removable device for R16 and failed to ensure interventions were implemented for R20 who both were reviewed and at risk for pressure injury.
- D Provide appropriate foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were obtained for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for foot care.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R37) with repeated falls had implemented interventions to promote safety and reduce the risk of falls and the facility failed to ensure R37 was free from physical restraints.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDR) were attempted, or an adequate medical justification for the use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 residents (R19, R14) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to provide menu's and alternate food choices to 2 of 2 residents (R14, R98) reviewed for food. R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart disease (CHF), type II diabetes. and required setup/clean up assistance with eating. R14's physician's orders dated 6/30/24, indicated a consistent carbohydrate diet, regular texture, regular (thin) consistency, no added salt. Offer assistance cutting foods, related to type II diabetes mellitus. R14's care plan dated 7/24/24, indicated a potential for alteration in nutrition related to diabetes mellitus type II (DMII), obesity, and history of COVID 19, iron deficiency anemia, depression, dementia, dysphagia, and hypertension (HTN) with an intervention to offer substitute for dislikes or when not eating. [...]
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure complete required nurse staffing information was posted and was timely on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents, staff, and visitors who could wish to review this information.
June 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to accurately transcribe an order for an anti-convulsant (anti-seizure medication) upon admission for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for medication administration in accordance with physician instructions. This resulted in actual harm for R1 when he had seizures and required treatment in the hospital. The facility had taken action to prevent this type of medication error from occurring again, therefore is being cited at past noncompliance.
September 7, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 2 residents (R24) reviewed who had not been shaved.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure privacy during personal cares for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for personal cares.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grooming was offered and/or provided for 1 of 2 residents (R32) reviewed for shaving.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for 1 of 2 residents (R52) at risk for pressure ulcers when an air mattress was not functioning properly.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a nursing rehabilitation functional maintenance program (FMP) for 1 of 3 residents (R24) who had limited range of motion.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable for 1 of 2 residents (R207) reviewed.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 2, 2026, 3 on August 7, 2024.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.30 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.90 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.91 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.82 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.59 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.7% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.46 on weekdays and 2.91 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.51 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.30 | 0.90 | 3.46 | 2.91 | 10.2% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.34 | 0.83 | 3.48 | 2.98 | 11.7% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.42 | 0.72 | 3.56 | 3.06 | 8.8% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.51 | 0.73 | 3.67 | 3.13 | 12.0% | 0 of 91 | 48 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.9 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.4 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.4 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ESTATES AT GREELEY LLC. CMS links this home to Monarch Healthcare Management, a group of 45 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nij LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Spartan Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Yazoma Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Arem, Jeffrey | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Stern, William | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 03/01/2017 |
| Halpert, Marc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Jaffa, Noam | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Halpert, Marc | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Stern, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Monarch Healthcare Operating IV LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2017 | |
| Stern, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on July 2, 2026: "Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 21, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 2, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2024: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.91 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Estates at Linden LLC Stillwater, 0.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Stillwater Stillwater, 0.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Gables of Boutwells Landing Oak Park Heights, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Christian Community Home Hudson, 6.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake White Bear Lake, 10.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Maplewood Rehabilitation Center Maplewood, 10.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Harmony Gardens Maplewood, 11 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Woodbury Health Care Center Woodbury, 12.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Estates at Greeley LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Estates at Greeley LLC 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Estates at Greeley LLC get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 2, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has The Estates at Greeley LLC been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Estates at Greeley LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Estates at Greeley LLC?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Monarch Healthcare Management. Legal business name: ESTATES AT GREELEY LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.