Harmony Gardens
1438 County Road C East, Maplewood, MN 55109 · Ramsey County · (651) 488-6658
64 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245381 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 26, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.64 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.40 of those hours.
24.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Cassia, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
March 26, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerators were labeled, dated, and not expired. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents who received food from the facility kitchen.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pillows were not used in a manner to restrain residents while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for restraints.
- D Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a subset (i.e., discharge) Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) database in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed for MDS accuracy.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess residents' ability to independently empty and report urine output for 1 of 1 resident (R50) reviewed who had a urinary catheter.
April 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess physical restraints (manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to a resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) reviewed who use bedrails.
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds, assess the residents for risk of entrapment, review risks and benefits for bed rail use, ensure bed dimensions were appropriate for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) review for bed rails.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report allegations of abuse and injury of unknow origin to the State Agency (SA) no later than two hours after the allegation is made for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed. R1's family filed a facility grievance that indicated staff was aggressive with R1 and a facility nurse found bruising that were similar to finger marks on R1's upper arm where a cause was not identified. Neither event was reported.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide evidence that a thorough investigation was completed on allegations of an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed. Staff found bruising resembling finger markings on R1's upper arm. R1's family had filed a grievance report regarding aggressive care one day prior to the bruising findings.
January 9, 2025Standard inspection · 10 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow transmission based precautions (TBP) based on signage located outside resident's doors for R29, R45, R17, R14. This had the potential to affect all residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during 3 of 6 residents (R14, R55, R47) observed for medication administration.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure timely care was provided in a manner to maintain and enhance quality of life for 1 of 2 residents (R64) reviewed for call lights.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed safe for self-administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed and observed for self-administration of medications.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure ambulation program was completed daily for 1 of 1 residents (R62) who was reviewed for ambulation.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents (R64) reviewed for pressure injury.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a hand splint was used for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed for range of motion (ROM).
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions necessary to maintain continence for 1 of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for bowel and bladder.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were completed for 1 of 1 resident (R32) who was reviewed for nutrition.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and monitor new bruising at the fistula site for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis.
- D Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary preferences were accommodated for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed for food preferences.
September 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure care planned interventions were followed during transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents when staff failed to use a transfer belt. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who fell during a staff assisted transfer and sustained a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey therefore, was issued at past noncompliance.
January 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard of practice when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (compressing the chest to pump blood through the body and blowing air into a persons lungs in attempt to revive a person with no pulse who is not breathing) was initiated on a resident who displayed signs of rigor mortis (the stiffening of the joints and muscles of a body after death) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for death. R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had died in the facility on [DATE]. [...]
November 9, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to allow active resident and resident representative participation in the development and review of care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R59) that was a new admission.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to clean and maintain resident's wheelchairs for 1 of 1 resident (R23).
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents that were prescribed psychotropic medications were monitored for target behaviors for 1 of 1 newly admitted resident (R59) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on March 26, 2026.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.64 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.40 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.21 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.46 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 24.7% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 15.8% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.82 on weekdays and 4.21 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.55 in April to June 2025 to 4.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.64 | 1.40 | 4.82 | 4.21 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.37 | 1.34 | 4.48 | 4.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.43 | 1.29 | 4.59 | 4.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 62 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.55 | 1.25 | 4.72 | 4.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 60 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Minnesota
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $19.39 to $23.72 | 29,120 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.83 to $34.26 | 12,840 |
| Registered nurses | $48.80 | $42.76 to $55.17 | 70,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.8 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.0 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.3 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: NEW HARMONY CARE CENTER, INC.. CMS links this home to Cassia, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elim Care Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/25/1995 |
| Cassia | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2020 |
| Addington, Jon | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Aderinkomi, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Nuss, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Vlaminck, Lores | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Weber-Daniels, Nicolette | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Brady, Jaime | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Brown, Angela | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Kern, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Libbon, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Mason, Krissa | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Stadtherr, Seelochani | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Youngquist, Kathryn | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2001 | |
| Cassia | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2018 | |
| Albrecht, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/05/1998 | |
| Almsted, Kris | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/15/2025 | |
| Baldwin, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/28/1998 | |
| Brady, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Libbon, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Mason, Krissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Schwensen, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/13/2026 | |
| Sonntag, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Thompson, Laurie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/15/2021 | |
| Vogel, Marissa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/11/2017 | |
| Youngquist, Kathryn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Cassia | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/05/2026 | |
| Brady, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Brown, Angela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Libbon, Paul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Mason, Krissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Schwensen, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2026 | |
| Sonntag, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Youngquist, Kathryn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Maplewood Rehabilitation Center Maplewood, 1.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood Saint Paul, 2.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Cerenity Care Center White Bear Lake White Bear Lake, 4.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- The Estates at Roseville LLC Roseville, 4.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- The Villas at Roseville Roseville, 5.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Cerenity Marian of St. Paul LLC Saint Paul, 5.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Capital View Transitional Care Center Saint Paul, 5.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Langton Shores Roseville, 5.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Harmony Gardens's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Harmony Gardens 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Harmony Gardens get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 26, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Harmony Gardens been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Harmony Gardens accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Harmony Gardens?
- CMS lists 34 owners and managers, and links the home to Cassia. Legal business name: NEW HARMONY CARE CENTER, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.