Home / New York / Rockville Centre
41 Maine Avenue, Rockville Centre, NY 11570 · Nassau County · (516) 536-7730
158 certified beds, about 155 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335297 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 10, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since June 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $60,401 in the last three years; the largest was $60,401, and the latest is dated January 10, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.33 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
25.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Carerite Centers, an affiliated group of 34 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and received maintenance services necessary to maintain an orderly and comfortable interior. This was identified for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for Environment. Specifically, on 06/17/2026, a bed remote was observed with exposed wires for the bed and room where Resident #1 had resided prior to their discharge from the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss where the outer layer of skin is broken) pressure ulcer to the sacrum (triangular bone in lower back). There was no documented physician's order for wound care until 04/06/2026 and no documentation in the treatment administration record that wound care treatment was administered for the Stage 2 pressure ulcer until 04/07/2026.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to ensure complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized medical records were available for each resident. This was identified for one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, on 09/18/2025 Resident #4 had a physician's order for Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) intravenously every 24 hours for seven days for urinary tract infection. The electronic medication administration record for Resident #4 contained no documentation that the medication was administered two of the seven days on 09/20/2025 and 09/23/2025.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to each resident who requires such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #234) of four (4) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #234 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacrum (a large, triangular bone at the base of the spine). The resident was heard from the hallway loudly complaining of pain and they wanted to die. The resident did not have a physician's order for pain medications. Interviews with the facility staff revealed the resident complained of pain since they developed a pressure ulcer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for three (Resident #335, Resident#283, and Resident #284) of three residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, Resident #335, Resident #283 and Resident #284 were not provided a privacy cover for their urinary catheter bags. Both residents' urinary catheter bags contained urine and were visible from the hallway.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive assessments of residents were conducted within 14 calendar days after admission and not less than once every 12 months. This was identified for two (Resident #67 and Resident #37) of six residents reviewed during the Resident Assessment Task. Specifically, Resident #67 and Resident #37's annual Minimum Data Set Assessment was not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Reference date. The finding is: The facility policy titled MDS Assessments, dated 12/10/2024, documented all Minimum Data Set assessments are to be completed and submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as per the guidelines provided in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the prescribed time frames. This was identified for three (Resident #6, Resident#113, Resident #13) of six residents reviewed during the Resident Assessment Task. Specifically, Resident #6, Resident#113, and Resident #13 Quarterly Minimum Data assessment was not completed within 14 days of the Assessment Reference date. The finding is: The facility policy titled MDS Assessments, dated 12/10/2024, documented all Minimum Data Set assessments are to be completed and submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as per the guidelines provided in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for each resident including measurable objectives and timeframe to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident#233) of one resident reviewed for Hydration; one (Resident #68) of seven residents reviewed during the Medication Administration Task; and one (Resident #285) of two residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter or Urinary Tract Infection. Specifically, 1) Resident #233 had a physician's order for intravenous hydration therapy; however, there was no comprehensive care plan developed for the insertion, care, and use of the Intravenous Catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. This was identified for one (Resident #94) of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #94 was observed on multiple occasions with long, untrimmed fingernails on both hands. Resident #94 stated they were unable to trim their fingernails on their own and wanted them trimmed. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living Care, dated 10/2024, documented the nursing home shall provide Activities of Daily Living care that promote and maintains residents' health, safety, independence, and dignity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for one (Resident #234) of four residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #234 had a physician's order for a positioning triangle wedge for pressure relief due to the resident having a Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness tissue loss; a deep wound extending through all layers of the skin into the fatty tissue beneath, indicating significant tissue damage) to the sacrum (a large, triangular bone at the base of the spine). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 01/05/2025 and completed on 01/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem, and the healthcare provider ordered a therapeutic diet. This was identified for one (Resident #54) of six residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #54 experienced a 10% weight loss over one month, decreasing from 99 pounds on November 5, 2024, to 89 pounds by December 12, 2024. Registered Dietician #1 recommended weekly weights; however, there was no documented evidence the resident's weights were obtained weekly to monitor further weight loss. Subsequently, Resident #54 had an additional 7% weight loss from 12/12/2024 to 1/7/2024. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/5/2025 and completed on 1/10/2025 the facility did not ensure Intravenous antibiotics were administered consistent with professional standard of practice and in accordance with physician's orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for two (Resident #336 and Resident #285) of two residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection. Specifically, 1) Resident #336 had a Midline Intravenous Catheter (a type of peripheral intravenous access, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm) on the left arm. There were no physician orders for monitoring and flushing the Midline Intravenous Catheter. 2) Resident #285 was observed with a peripheral intravenous catheter (Midline Intravenous Catheter ) in their right arm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey (Complaint Number: NY00340154) the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. Specifically, one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accident sustained 10 falls during a short-term stay. Resident #1 sustained a fall 3-day post admission which required hospitalization. During hospitalization, Resident #1 required continuous visual monitoring. Resident #1 was readmitted to the facility and sustained 9 additional unwitnessed falls. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023, the facility must develop and implement a Comprehensive Person- Centered Care Plan (CCP) for each resident that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for Advance Directives; for one (Resident #79) of two residents reviewed for Communication-Sensory care area; and one (Resident #22) of four residents reviewed for Positioning/Mobility care area. Specifically, 1) Resident #42 had no CCP developed for their Advance Directives. 2) Resident #79 whose primary language is Spanish; however, no CCP was developed to address the resident's communication needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey ( Complaint #NY00297167 and NY00313454) initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #107) of two residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers; one (Resident #292) of five residents reviewed for Accidents; and one (Resident #22) of four residents reviewed for Positioning/Mobility. Specifically, 1) Resident #107 was admitted on [DATE] with a Stage II pressure ulcer to the sacrum as per the nursing admission assessment; however, a treatment for the sacrum wound was not started until 2/15/2022; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (NY00318753 and NY00313454), initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for two (Resident #292 and Resident #76) of 6 residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, 1) for Resident #292, who was found on the floor, the facility investigation did not include statements from all involved parties to accurately identify the root cause for Resident #292's fall on 10/26/22; and 2) The facility did not obtain statements from the 1st floor 11P-7AM staff and the Maintenance Worker when Resident #76 eloped from the facility on 6/21/2023.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00313454) initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident's comprehensive person-centered Care Plan (CCP) was reviewed and revised by the Interdisciplinary Team after each assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #292) of five residents reviewed for Accidents, 2) for one (Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers and 3) one (Resident #35) of five residents reviewed for Unnecessary Medications. Specifically, 1) Resident #292 had five falls between 10/25/2022 and 11/29/2022. The resident's Falls care plan was not updated after each fall to reflect new interventions to prevent further falls; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023, the facility did not ensure that residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This was identified for one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for the Rehabilitation and Restorative care area. Specifically, Resident #33 was not ambulated according to their Floor Ambulation Program (FAP) as ordered by the Physician. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews, during a Recertification Survey initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023 the facility did not ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU). Specifically, Resident #82 was identified as having a Stage II Pressure Ulcer to the Sacral region on 9/15/2022 as per a Physician's orders dated 9/15/2022. There was no documented evidence in the medical record that the Sacral PU was evaluated or assessed by a qualified clinician until 9/29/2022. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00318753), the facility did not ensure that all residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #76) of three residents reviewed for Accident Hazards. Specifically, Resident #76 exhibited exit seeking behaviors. On 6/21/2023, Resident #76 left the facility through two alarmed doors undetected by the facility staff and was located outside the facility by a community member. Additionally, during observation the fire exit door alarm that Resident #76 had previously breached was not audible to staff on the 1st floor, including the reception area. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/21/2023 and completed on 6/28/2023, the facility did not assure that each resident was provided medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This was identified for one (Resident #42) of one resident reviewed for Advance Directives. Specifically, Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Social Services conducted initial Social Services Evaluation upon admission on [DATE]; however, there was no documented evidence that the Advance Directives were reviewed with Resident #42 or their designated representative after 3/12/2022 as per the facility's policy. The finding is: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 6/11/2021, the facility did not ensure that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. This was identified for 1 (Resident # 183) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #183 had an admitting diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure and was on Oxygen therapy without a baseline Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) developed. The finding is: Resident # 183 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 6/11/2021, the facility did not provide proper respiratory treatments and care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #183) of three residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #183 had an admitting diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure and was receiving Oxygen therapy without a Physician's order. The finding is: The undated policy and procedure for Oxygen administration documented to verify there is a physician order for the procedure and to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. The policy included to monitor and document the rate of oxygen flow, route and rationale and all assessment data before, during, and after the procedure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 6/11/2021, the facility did not ensure that for one (Resident # 183) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory care, the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including treatments. Specifically, Resident #183 was administered Oxygen without a Physician's evaluation and without Physician's orders for the use of Oxygen. The finding is: The undated policy and procedure for Oxygen administration documented to verify there is a Physician order for the procedure and to review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. Resident #183 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia. [...]
15 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 10, 2025, 7 on June 28, 2023, 6 on June 11, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 10, 2025 | Fine | $60,401 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.33 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.96 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.97 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.77 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 25.9% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 43.3% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 2.96 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.43 in April to June 2025 to 3.33 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.59 | 3.47 | 2.96 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 155 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.24 | 0.55 | 3.38 | 2.89 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 156 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.32 | 0.59 | 3.44 | 3.02 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 154 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.43 | 0.60 | 3.54 | 3.13 | 0.6% | 0 of 91 | 152 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.9 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.2 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Grand Pavilion for Rehab & Nursing at Rockvill's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
58.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 679 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 555 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 403 eligible stays.
56.8% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 317 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 442 residents counted.
1.7% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 442 residents counted.
98.7% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 230 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ROCKVILLE OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Carerite Centers, a group of 34 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Einhorn, Sharon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 35% | 09/01/2012 |
| Friedman, Devorah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 35% | 09/01/2012 |
| Minser, Dov | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Minzer, Israel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 09/01/2012 |
| Minzer, Naftali | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Sussman, Rivka | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Friedman, Devorah | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Ali, Aleem | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/25/2023 | |
| Eisen, Yehuda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/17/2023 | |
| Fabian, Eva | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/03/2025 | |
| Ali, Aleem | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/25/2023 | |
| Einhorn, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Eisen, Yehuda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2023 | |
| Fabian, Eva | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/03/2025 | |
| Minzer, Israel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Schlesinger, Ernest | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2012 | |
| Zucker, Yossie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.