Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Fulton

The Meadows

1905 South Adams Street, Fulton, MS 38843 · Itawamba County · (662) 862-2165

130 certified beds, about 125 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255160 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated November 3, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.77 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.84 of those hours.

51.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
1E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
June 4, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible contamination of ice, as evidenced by a buildup of a black substance on the inside door and the interior ledge of the ice machine that was used for all residents for one (1) of three (3) kitchen tours. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Ice Machine Cleaning Policy with an effective date of 5/3/2021 revealed, .The kitchen staff will be responsible for weekly cleanings of ice machines in the kitchen .During the initial kitchen tour on 6/1/2026 at 10:24 AM, observation of the ice machine revealed two areas of black substance, each approximately two to three inches in diameter, on the underside of the ice maker lid. Black substance was also observed along the interior ledge of the ice machine. [...]
  2. F
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    F882 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist implemented and monitored the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program by failing to conduct infection surveillance, track and trend infections, analyze infection data and identify infection control concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 118 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy titled Compliant Infection Preventionist (IP) Job Description revealed under, Position Summary: The Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for the development, implementation, oversight, and evaluation of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). [...]
  3. E
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program, failed to ensure urinary tract infections (UTIs) were reviewed using established infection criteria before antibiotic treatment, failed to track and trend infection data, and failed to identify and implement interventions to reduce infections for numerous UTI episodes identified on the facility's infection tracking logs from February 2026 through April 2026. This was for three (3) of four (4) months reviewed.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plans were implemented for two (2) of 25 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to implement established ADL care plan interventions related to facial hair for Residents #59 and #67.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide necessary Activities of Daily Living (ADL) services for two (2) of 25 sampled residents who were dependent on staff assistance to maintain their personal hygiene and grooming needs. Resident #59 and Resident #67.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program by failing to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (Resident #91) and by failing to provide an appropriate biohazard (red barrel) container for a resident under transmission-based precautions. (Resident #118) for two (2) of 25 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control-Contact Isolation/Transmission Based/Enhanced Barrier Policy with a revision date of August 2024 revealed, 2. Contact Isolation. Red/Yellow bagged barrels will be utilized . Record review of physician orders revealed Resident #118 had an order dated 6/2/2026 for contact isolation precautions related to ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) in urine every shift. [...]
November 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, the facility failed to notify the medical provider prior to administering a medication that required pulse rate monitoring for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for medication monitoring (Resident #1). This failure resulted in a medication being administered multiple times when the resident's pulse rate was below the facility-required threshold of sixty (60), without provider notification or guidance.
November 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during a mechanical lift transfer and a resident sustained a forehead laceration requiring sutures for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled. Resident #1Findings include:Record review of facility policy titled, Total Lift Policy with revision date of 2/2/17 revealed, It is the policy of the facility that a total lift will be utilized as follows: by a licensed nurse or CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) . It requires two employees when lift is used .A phone interview with CNA #1 on 11/3/25 at 10:40 AM, revealed she was the CNA caring for Resident #1 when the lift incident occurred. [...]
May 29, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to promote dignity by not ensuring the use of a privacy cover for the urinary catheter bag for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed with a catheter. (Resident #2) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Placement Policy, with a revision date of August 14, 2017, revealed catheter bags should be placed inside a privacy bag. Review of the facility policy titled Dignity Policy, with a revision date of September 6, 2010, revealed care should be provided in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity with respect in full recognition of his or her individuality. [...]
  2. D
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    F553 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to involve a bed-bound resident for a scheduled care plan meeting for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #80 Findings Include: Review of the Care Plan Invitation Policy unrevised revealed, It is the policy of this facility that invitations to care plan conferences will be handled in the following manner: The resident and/or the responsible party will be invited to attend the care planning conference by one week prior to the scheduled date . A formal interdisciplinary care planning conference will be held weekly on Thursday. All members present are to provide input and sign the care plan verifying attendance . Review of the Resident Rights Policy with a revision date of 12/06/10 revealed under, Exercise Rights: [...]
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to allow a resident the opportunity to make important care-related decisions for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #87 Findings Include: Review of the Resident Rights Policy with a revision date of 9/06/10 revealed under, Exercise Rights: Each resident will be able to exercise his/her rights as a resident in this facility and as a citizen of the United States. An observation and interview with Resident #87 on 5/27/25 at 10:56 AM revealed she was sitting in her wheelchair in her room and stated that she did not sleep well last night and explained that they made her get up early this morning. She revealed, I told them I would rather not get up, and I wanted to sleep in. The resident stated that they made her get up anyway. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete Section K of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a resident with significant weight loss for one (1) of 21 sampled residents. Resident #48 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument Policy (RAI) with a revision date of 5/19/15 revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the RAI will be done as follows: According to the guideline specified by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) . Record review of the Weights Detail Report for Resident #48 revealed the following recorded weights: 3/27/25 237.1 4/29/25 230.3 Record review of the readmission Assessment for Resident #48 dated 5/07/25 revealed a weight of 206.6, which was a significant weight loss of 10.29% (percent) from the last documented weight on 4/29/25. [...]
November 30, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that one (1) of 24 sampled residents was protected from verbal abuse. Resident #268 Findings Include: Record review of the Facility's Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation Policy with revised date of November 21, 2017, documented, It is the policy of this facility that all residents will be free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation following the guidelines in the Vulnerable Adult Act . On 11/28/23 at 12:40 PM, an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that on 10/30/23, it was reported to her that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 had spoken inappropriately to a resident. [...]
  2. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately complete a Pre-admission Screening (PAS) for a resident with a mental disorder for one (1) of two (2) resident PASSARs (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) reviewed. Resident #35 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program with an implementation date of 07/10/23 revealed under the Policy: This facility coordinates assessments with pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs . Record review of Resident #35's Record of Admission revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
  3. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review the facility failed to have a stop date on an As Needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications. Resident #58 Findings Include: Review of the typed statement on facility letterhead (undated) revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding a stop date for psychotropic medications and was signed by the Administrator. Record review of Resident #58's Physician's Orders revealed the following: Order dated 7/20/23-Lorazepam oral concentrate 2mg (milligrams)/1ml (milliliter) give 1ml every 2 (two) hours as needed for anxiety oral. [...]
  4. B
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to transmit Annual and Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments accurately and timely for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for MDS assessments.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
November 3, 2025Fine $8,278

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.774.183.86
Registered nurses0.840.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.113.503.42
Nurse aides1.94
Licensed practical nurses0.99
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)51.8%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover20.0%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.04 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.77 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.770.844.043.11 0.0%0 of 90125
Oct to Dec 20253.750.793.983.15 0.0%0 of 92124
Jul to Sep 20254.290.844.573.56 0.0%0 of 92124
Apr to Jun 20254.340.824.663.54 0.0%0 of 91120
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
43.020.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.31.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.02.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.23.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.22.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
45.719.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.16.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.521.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.327.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.015.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.52.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.62.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: DANIEL HEALTH CARE, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Holland, Eric5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual36%01/01/2001
Holland, James5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual29%01/01/2001
Holland, JamesDirect ownership interestIndividual01/01/2001
Jones, JacqulineOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2007
Seay, StacyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2007
Holland, EricAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2023
Holland, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2001
Jones, JacqulineAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2015
Seay, StacyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2007

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 18, 2025: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 4, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.11 hours per resident per day, below the Mississippi average of 3.50.

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Meadows's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Meadows 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Meadows get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has The Meadows been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years.
Does The Meadows accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Meadows?
CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: DANIEL HEALTH CARE, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection