Find a nursing home

Home / Michigan / Grand Blanc

The Oaks at Woodfield

5370 East Baldwin Road, Grand Blanc, MI 48439 · Genesee County · (810) 606-9950

64 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235660 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 23 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.98 of those hours.

41.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).

CMS links it to Trilogy Health Services, an affiliated group of 127 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
7E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 10, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1) Call lights were answered in a timely manner, 2) Residents' preferences were respected, and 3) Residents were treated with dignity during the provision of care for one resident (Resident #28) and a confidential group of residents reviewed for dignity with care.
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that medications and related supplies were properly labeled, stored, and discarded upon expiration and, 2) Failed to secure chemical medication destroyers, chemical sanitation cloths, and alcohol based hand rubs out of residents' reach. These deficiencies were identified in two of two medication carts, one of two medication rooms, and in three of three resident units reviewed for medication storage.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in allowing waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system with an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility.
  5. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake Number 3011265. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate, complete and thorough investigation was conducted for one (1) resident (Resident #77) of 3 residents reviewed for discharges when Resident #77 became unresponsive while receiving a shower done by a family member with unknown training for performing safe Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and no other nursing staff member was present to witness the unusual event resulting in R77 hitting her head on the grab bar, exhibiting a significant change in condition during the shower and being immediately transferred to the hospital for evaluation.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #85) of 19 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #85 lacking Care Plan interventions for a neck brace, which could lead to the resident lacking necessary care and services. Findings Include: Resident #85: Care Plans A record review of the Face sheet and electronic medical record indicated Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of falls with facial fracture, sixth cervical vertebral fracture, fracture of first thoracic vertebra, wedge compression fracture of second thoracic vertebra, fracture nasal bones, maxillary fracture, dementia, hypothyroidism, anxiety, and hypertension. On 6/08/2026 at 10:19 AM, Resident #85 was observed sitting in a Broda chair in the dayroom on the 100 Hall. [...]
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate skin care was provided for one resident (Resident #40) and that appropriate Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for one resident (Resident #77) was provided by trained nursing staff during showers for 6 residents reviewed for skin and ADL care.
  8. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number 3011265. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that neurological assessments (neuro checks) were completed per Standards of Practice after unwitnessed resident falls and/or witnessed falls with a head injury for 1 resident (Resident # 80) of 3 resiudents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for head injury without necessary Neuro assessments. Findings Include: Accidents Resident #80: A record review of the Face sheet electronic medical record (EMR) indicated that Resident #80 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and with several readmissions and diagnoses: Dementia, anxiety, depression, epilepsy, heart disease, Chronic pain syndrome, COPD, GERD, history of falls. The resident died on [DATE]. [...]
  9. D
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff records for Covid-19 vaccination education, and acceptance or declination of the vaccination were documented and maintained for 2 staff members Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L and Nurse M of 3 staff members reviewed for Covid-19 vaccinations. Findings Include: Infection Control: On 6/10/2026 at 10:09 AM, during an interview with Infection Control Practitioner O she said she said she had worked as the ICP at the facility for 2 years and was responsible for the Immunization program for residents and staff. She said staff were assessed on hire for vaccination status and she said the MCIR Michigan Care Improvement Registry was reviewed to determination staff vaccination status. The ICP O said staff were offered Covid-19 vaccinations through a pharmacy or at their providers office. [...]
April 9, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake Number 2743538. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff possessed an active Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certification, resulting in the potential to not meet the needs of residents requiring CPR.
May 8, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered, comprehensive care plan for 4 residents (# 8, #28, #45, #47) of 16 residents reviewed.
  2. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure medication storage and ensure that supplies was labeled and not expired for two medication rooms and four medication storage carts and treatment carts reviewed for storage of drugs, biologicals and supplies.
  3. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received timely Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care and ensure that residents' preferences were followed for bathing for three residents (R24, R28, R55) of four residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in residents receiving bed baths instead of showers, not receiving showers on scheduled days, long nails and long facial hair.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hospice records/communication were part of the medical record for two Residents (#45 and #47) of two reviewed for hospice services.
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that weights were obtained, monitored as ordered, and recommended for 2 residents (#28 and #55) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings Include: Resident #28: Nutrition A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Diabetes, depression, hypothyroidism, hypertension, asthma GERD and chronic pain. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident weighed 94 lbs. and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status/BIMS score of 15/15. On 5/7/2025 at 1:15 PM, during an interview with Resident #28 she was observed sitting in bed eating her lunch. She appeared very thin. A record review of the electronic medical record/emr weights for Resident #28 identified the following weights: [...]
  6. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to inform and offer transportation to and from dialysis appointments, as part of the services at no cost, for one resident (R#55), of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services.
May 16, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours of admission for two residents (Resident #2, Resident #40) of 20 residents reviewed, resulting in incomplete baseline care plans, falls, and unmet care needs.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00142646. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely dressing changes for two residents (Reside#5, Resident #117) of four residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in missed dressing changes and the potential for worsening wounds.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place and supervision was provided to prevent a fall with injury for one resident (Resident #52) and repeated falls for one resident (Resident #15) of 2 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #52 falling and sustaining a fracture and Resident #15 falling multiple times and injuring his face. Findings Include: Resident #15: A review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Left leg above the knee amputation, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, COPD, morbid obesity, depression, anxiety, dementia, chronic pain, weakness. [...]
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that weight loss was monitored, addressed with updated nutritional interventions, and notify the registered dietician of the weight loss for one resident (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for weight loss of a total sample of 20 residents, resulting in the potential for continued rapid weight loss and compromised health condition.
  5. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the drug regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the physician in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #15) of five residents reviewed for medications, resulting in the resident receiving a medication with potential adverse effects, including falling. Findings Include: Resident #15: Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review A review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Left leg above the knee amputation, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, COPD, morbid obesity, depression, anxiety, dementia, chronic pain, weakness. [...]
November 9, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140473. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete accurate reconciliation, documentation and wasting of narcotics which were administered to three residents (Resident #802, Resident #804, and Resident #805), resulting in narcotic administration not being consistently documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) when administered, narcotic sheets not being reconciled with the MAR for accuracy and improper wasting of Resident #805's narcotic medication. Findings Include: Resident #802: On 11/8/2023 at 2:15 PM, Resident #802 was observed resting peacefully in his room and there were no outward signs of pain at this time. [...]
  2. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140473 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property for one resident (Resident #801) of 5 residents reviewed for narcotic diversion, resulting in, Nurse A admitting to an unintentional overdose on Resident #801's liquid morphine during Nurse A's weekend shift at the facility.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 10, 2026, 1 on December 18, 2025, 2 on May 8, 2025, 1 on May 16, 2024.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · December 18, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 8, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · May 8, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.263.993.86
Registered nurses0.980.780.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.963.503.42
Nurse aides2.20
Licensed practical nurses1.08
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)41.6%44.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover43.8%39.2%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.37 on weekdays and 3.96 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.29 in April to June 2025 to 4.26 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.260.984.373.96 0.0%0 of 9059
Oct to Dec 20254.280.774.384.01 0.0%0 of 9259
Jul to Sep 20254.310.974.493.86 0.0%0 of 9259
Apr to Jun 20254.290.934.483.82 0.0%0 of 9160
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Michigan, Jan to Mar 20263.950.704.143.453.3%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Michigan

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Michigan, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$19.03$18.35 to $21.5943,290
LPNs and LVNs$31.47$29.83 to $35.5210,880
Registered nurses$45.34$39.46 to $49.74104,950
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For The Oaks at Woodfield. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMichiganUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.510.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.93.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.31.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.25.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.214.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.524.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.911.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.21.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Oaks at Woodfield's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (66.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

66.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 283 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 311 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 182 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

60.4% this home

Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 139 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.6% this home

Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 176 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.6% this home

Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 176 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

98.3% this home

Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 118 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF GENESEE, LLC. CMS links this home to Trilogy Health Services, a group of 127 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Continental Merger Sub LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization10/01/2021
Northstar Healthcare Income Inc5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization10/01/2021
Northstar Healthcare Income Operating Partnership LP5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization10/01/2021
Trilogy Holdings Nt-Hci, LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization10/01/2021
Keybank National Association5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization12/01/2015
Corbin, KathyW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/10/2011
Fightmaster, LisaW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/01/2015
Barney, LeighCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2019
Bryant, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual01/05/2016
Bufford, RandallCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2019
Conner, GregoryCorporate officerIndividual06/03/2021
Davis, DavidCorporate officerIndividual08/21/2017
Prosky, DannyCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2015
Streiff, MathieuCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2015
Trilogy Management Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2021
Glynn, KellyOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Oaks at Woodfield's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Oaks at Woodfield 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Oaks at Woodfield get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 10, 2026. The Michigan average is 9.9.
Has The Oaks at Woodfield been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Oaks at Woodfield accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Oaks at Woodfield?
CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Trilogy Health Services. Legal business name: TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF GENESEE, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection