901 Pine Creek Drive, Fenton, MI 48430 · Genesee County · (810) 616-4100
100 certified beds, about 89 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235715 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.
58.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to The Wellbridge Group, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteNumber of residents sampled: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach, responded to in a timely manner, and that staff were respectful upon entering the residents' rooms and providing care for five confidential residents (#6, #35, #60, #75, #86) and a confidential group of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate and timely Beneficiary Notification (NOMNC and ABN) to two (2) residents (Resident #95 and Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for Medicaid/Medicare Coverage/Liability Notice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nail care was provided, and handwashing was offered prior to dining for one resident (Resident #6), of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were securely stored for safe administration, for one resident (Resident #78 (R78)) of 12 residents, 1 medication storage room, and 4 wall-mounted medication storage units reviewed for medication storage, resulting in the potential for medication error or misappropriation. Resident #78 (R78):According to a review of R78's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing care related to medical diagnoses of Chondrocostal junction syndrome (inflammatory condition affecting the cartilage where the ribs in sternum meet), subsequent fall, acute with chronic respiratory failure, Myocardial infarct (heart attack), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for residents identified with qualifying wounds and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG - delivers nutrition and medications directly into the stomach), for two residents Resident #9 and Resident #60 (R9 and R60)) of eight residents reviewed for infection prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity for 4 residents (Resident's #66, #73, #68, and #281) and 5 of 7 confidential Resident Council group meeting (held on 12/10/24) residents, regarding call lights within reach and the timely answering of the call lights. Findings Include: Resident #73: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans dated 10/29/24, nursing note's dated 11/24 through 12/10/24, and physician orders dated 12/24, revealed Resident #73 was 68 years-old, alert with memory deficient and confusion, and had a feeding tube; he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was an 1 person assist with 2 persons for walker, and he has a history of falls at the facility and respiratory impairments with oxygen dependency. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5% when six medication errors were observed from a total of 29 opportunities for three residents (#'s 28, 34, and 288) of six residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 20.69% and the potential for adverse medication effects and decreased medication efficacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure appropriate labeling, storage, and disposal of medications and medical supplies, per professional standards of practice for two of two medication storage rooms in the 400 hallway and in two residents' rooms, resulting in medications left unattended and unsecured, lack of dating of medications with a shortened expiration date after opening, storage of contaminated medications and medical supplies with new medications and medical supplies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two resident's (Resident's #28, and #55) care plans were updated and individualized, resulting in the potential for unsupervised outdoor activity, falls, and not meeting residents' needs. Findings Include: Resident #28: Review of the Face Sheet, fall report dated 1/22/24, nurse's note's dated 6/24 through 12/10/24, and care plans dated 10/23, revealed Resident #28 was [AGE] years old, alert with confusion, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had an extensive history of falls at the facility and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living, and transfers. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive skin care (assessments, treatment order, and documentation) for one resident (R#55) of 2 residents reviewed for skin and wound care of 41 total samples, resulting in the potential for severe pain, infection, and further delay in appropriate treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to mitigate risk of injury during wheelchair transport for one resident (Resident #45) of five residents reviewed for accidents resulting in the potential for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was in place for indwelling catheter changes and that the indwelling catheter changes were documented for one resident (R69) of one resident reviewed for catheters, resulting in the absence of a physician's order for indwelling catheter changes and the absence of documentation of indwelling catheter changes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to enter a physician's order timely for dialysis perma-cath care and follow a physician's order to complete dialysis documentation for one resident (R289) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care, resulting in incomplete and missing dialysis record forms and the absence of documentation of the dialysis perma-cath site being monitored.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, and 2) Ensure proper maintenance of kitchen equipment (dishwasher), resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 81 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen of a total census of 82 residents. Findings Include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. On 12/9/24 at 10:05 a.m., during the initial tour of the kitchen accompanied by Culinary Specialist H and Executive Chief I, the following was observed: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and ensure hand hygiene per professional standards of practice during medication administration for two residents (#32 and #48) of six residents reviewed during medication pass observation resulting in the potential for cross contamination and spread of microorganisms.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00146582, MI00146860, and MI00147441. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents were treated with respect and dignity by not ensuring call lights were in reach and answered timely, ensure respectable customer service and ensure the provision of Resident rights with care planning that included Resident representative input/awareness of resident's care, for Residents (#1, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 10) of eight reviewed for call lights, abuse, and resident rights, resulting in care needs not met timely, lack of Resident/resident representative awareness in Resident's received care, feelings of frustration and anger and the potential for unmet care needs and lack of psychosocial wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00146860 and MI00147441. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to monitor and inform the physician promptly regarding the declining status post-fall for one resident (Resident #5), resulting in the delay in treatment and hospitalization for Resident #5, who sustained a brain bleed post-fall.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to IntakeNumber MI00146582 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to enter a physician's order for wound care and update a skin integrity care plan timely for one resident (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in late physician's orders for wound care and late revision of a skin integrity care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store nebulizer equipment per facility policy and follow a physician's orders for oxygen administration for two residents (R3, R10) of three residents reviewed for nebulizer equipment, resulting in nebulizer equipment being stored on a bedside table and the medication chamber having fluid in it and not receiving the physician's ordered amount of oxygen administration.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00146860. Based on Interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain Physician visit documentation of one resident (Resident #5) in a timely manner of three residents reviewed for physician visits, resulting in delayed implementation of treatment orders and the potential for inappropriate physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy for EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for one resident (R7) of one resident reviewed for EBP, resulting in the nurse performing wound care without the required PPE (personal protective equipment) for a resident on EBP.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00143332 and MI00146115. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document post-fall monitoring, complete neurological checks and implement appropriate interventions for two residents (Resident #701 and Resident #703) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in, Resident #701 sustaining a fall without facility post-fall monitoring and neurological checks and Resident #703 sustaining three falls with subsequent injuries, one day apart, without meaningful interventions implemented, consistent neurological checks and post-fall monitoring/documentation. Findings Include: Resident #701: On 8/21/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM, a review was completed of Resident #701's medical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake #'s: MI00142837, MI00142926 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication between clinical services and social services to develop a person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident #501) of 4 residents reviewed for behavioral care, resulting in unmet care needs and a lack of individualized approaches to care with the likelihood of emotional and behavioral care needs being unassessed. Findings Include: Resident #501: A review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #501 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a brain bleed, schizophrenia, GERD, visual loss, urinary retention and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00138923 and MI00139581. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) Ensure that four residents' (Residents #6, Resident #19, Resident #56, and Resident #323) call lights were answered timely, and 2) Ensure that food was served warm for one resident (Resident #19), and 6 of 6 confidential residents from the Resident Council group meeting (held on 11/29/23) verbalizing complaints regarding staff answering their call lights, resulting in verbalizations of not wanting to eat cold food, embarrassment, accidents due to not being able to get to a toilet in time, shame and the potential of unmet care needs. Findings Include: Review of the facility Resident Rights/Dignity policy (un-dated), revealed all residents have the right to receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of their needs and preferences. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents an opportunity to choose their own attending physician and failed to honor their choice for an alternate physician for five of seven confidential residents during the Resident's Council group meeting, resulting in a lack of confidence and trust in health and medical decisions, lack of information and follow-up about their health status, feelings of intimidation and hopelessness on their rights to choose an attending physician for their best health and wellbeing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was supplied from the pharmacy or that the medication dispensing system was utilized to obtain the needed intravenous (IV) medication, Vancomycin, for one resident (Resident #221) of one resident reviewed for IV medication administration, resulting in IV medication not given as ordered, an interruption in the antibiotic treatment of an infection, with the potential for worsening of an infection and deterioration of health and well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store and handle medications in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice: 1.) for one medication room, one narcotics cupboard and 2 resident rooms (Resident #1 and Resident #41); 2.) ensure medication refrigerator temperatures outside of acceptable parameters were addressed; 3.) ensure narcotic keys for the 100 hall were secured; 4.) ensure two nurses sign that they completed a shift to shift narcotics count; [...]
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138923. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (Resident #22 [R#22]) authorized financial representative was able to make decisions regarding their choice for ancillary health insurance of one resident reviewed for rights exercised by representatives, resulting in the feeling of fear of exploitation and that the facility failed to uphold the resident's rights and ensure that the resident was protected from financial exploitation and/or misappropriation. Findings Include: Resident #22 (R#22): A record review was conducted on 11/29/23 at 4:30 PM. According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R#22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the most recent PASARR (dated 7/29/23), R#22 had the following diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), Level 1 and Level 2, was completed for one resident (Resident #13) of two residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for inappropriate admissions and the absence of available services for mental disorders or intellectual disability. Findings Include: Medicaid.gov: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASARR requires that Medicaid-certified nursing facilities: 1. Evaluate all applicants for ser Evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID) 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) showers and nail care for one resident ( Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for ADL's, resulting in Resident #25 not receiving showers/baths as scheduled or nail care. The lack of care caused the resident to feel frustrated, discouraged and lowered their quality of life. Findings Include: Resident #25: Activities of Daily Living: A record review of the Face Sheet and the Minimum Data Set MDS) assessment indicated Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, congestive heart failure, Crohn's disease, COPD, Atrial fibrillation, anxiety, chronic pain, history of strokes, hypothyroidism, GERD. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that wounds were assessed, monitored, wound care was provided and appropriate interventions were in place for one resident (Resident # 25) of 9 residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in Resident #25 developing a wound on the right knee and left ankle with no treatment or monitoring ordered after identification. Findings Include: Resident #25: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, congestive heart failure, Crohn's disease, COPD, Atrial fibrillation, anxiety, chronic pain, history of strokes, hypothyroidism, GERD. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive loss with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00140875. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place and supervision was provided after a fall with injury for one resident (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #2 falling out of bed while reaching for the call light, hitting her head and suffering a femur fracture. Findings Include: Resident #2: Accidents: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Cerebral Palsy, Diabetes, asthma, depression, bipolar disorder, hypertension, Chronic pain syndrome, GERD, and anxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the integrity of the intravenous (IV) tubing was maintained during administration of IV antibiotics, flush a Midline IV while the Midline IV was not in use and document the changing of the dressing and measurements for the Midline IV for one resident (Resident #221) of one resident reviewed for IV care, resulting in the potential for infection, malfunction of the PICC line and lack of documentation of performed procedures in the medical record.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store nebulizer treatment equipment in a clean and sanitary manner for one resident (Resident #222) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, resulting in the potential exposure to infectious organisms, respiratory infection and deterioration of health and well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor sedating medications for one resident (Resident #41) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in Resident #41 repeatedly requesting not to take the medications and having lethargy and falls. Findings Include: Resident #41: Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, cardiac defibrillator, anxiety history of falls with right fibula fracture prior to admission, and pain left hip. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5% when 2 medication errors were observed from a total of 28 opportunities for two residents (Resident #221 and Resident #223) of four residents observed for medication administration, resulting in an error rate of 7.14% with the potential for adverse reactions, uncontrolled pain and the change in medication regimen related to the omission of the 4% Lidocaine patch (topical medication used to help relieve pain, works as a local anesthetic and can be used for nerve pain) for Resident #223 and the medication Tramadol (medication used for moderate to severe pain) 50 mg (milligrams) not given at the appropriate time for Resident # 221.
10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 15, 2026, 3 on December 11, 2024, 5 on December 6, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.04 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.56 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.7% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 41.2% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.23 on weekdays and 3.56 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.90 in April to June 2025 to 4.04 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.04 | 0.66 | 4.23 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 89 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.04 | 0.63 | 4.18 | 3.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.00 | 0.58 | 4.18 | 3.56 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.90 | 0.68 | 4.07 | 3.46 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 33.6 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.3 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wellbridge of Fenton's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 212 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 219 eligible stays.
5.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 153 eligible stays.
65.9% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 91 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WELLBRIDGE OF FENTON, LLC. CMS links this home to The Wellbridge Group, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E2g, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 12/04/2012 |
| Senior Care Equities No 16 LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 12/04/2012 |
| Perry, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 01/01/2016 |
| Wronski, Frank | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 12/04/2014 |
| Tisch, Angela | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/16/2021 | |
| Sangster, Todd | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2016 | |
| Nexcare Health Systems, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.