Home / California / Greenbrae
The Tamalpais
501 Via Casitas, Greenbrae, CA 94904 · Marin County · (415) 461-2300
52 certified beds, about 20 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1969
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 056077 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 14 health citations since October 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.58 of those hours.
40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.
September 11, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week from January 2025 to August 2025 for all the residents residing in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in insufficient nursing care and services for the vulnerable residential population residing in the facility. During a review of the facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, dated Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31), the PBJ Staffing Data Report indicated, the facility had no RN hours for the following Sundays: 1/5/2025, 2/2/2025, 2/16/2025, 3/2/2025, and 3/30/2025. During a review of the facility's Skilled Daily Staffing, assignment report dated Sunday, 8/17/2025, the Skilled Daily Staffing report indicated there was no RN coverage for skilled nursing. [...]
- F Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a dedicated full-time infection preventionist (IP) according to the California Assembly [NAME] (AB) 2644 (Chapter 287, Statutes of 2020). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the facility's infection prevention and control program and the residents' quality of care.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove one multidose vial of PPD diagnostic antigen (chemical used to indicate tuberculosis) from the medication refrigerator 30 days after opening per facility policy. This failure had the potential to expose all the residents to use of an outdated antigen which could lead to an incorrect medical diagnosis for Tuberculosis (bacterial respiratory infection.)During an observation and interview on 9/9/2025 at 3:02 p.m. in the medication refrigerator located in the nursing station, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON verified a vial of PPD diagnostic antigen label indicated an opening date of 7/25/2025. The DON stated that the vial should have been discarded 30 days after opening. During an interview on 9/10/2025 at 4:48 p.m. [...]
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 2 sampled discharge residents (Resident 26), had a discharge order and discharge summary maintained in their medical record. This failure had the potential to adversely affect Resident 26's continuity of care after discharge.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (an individualized plan that provides direction on the type of care a resident needs) for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to not receive the specific services necessary to meet her needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 22) when:1. Resident 8 was observed without a wanderguard device (a wearable device designed to help prevent residents at risk of wandering from leaving a designated area in a care facility) per physician's order and there was no elopement assessment prior to placing a wander guard device on Resident 8. These failures had the potential to adversely affect Resident 8's physical and psychosocial well-being.2. Resident 22's floor mats were not placed as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to cause injury to Resident 22.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen preparation area was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner when one of the staff with facial hair was observed cooking food not wearing a beard net. This failure had the potential to place all residents who received food prepared in the kitchen at risk for food contamination. During an observation on 9/8/2025 at 2:20 p.m. of the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was observed without a beard net covering his facial hair while standing next to the stove cooking. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/10/2025 at 10:04 a.m. with Director of Dining Services (DDS), in the kitchen, the DDS verified that [NAME] 1 did not wear a beard net. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement infection control practices for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 7) when:1. Two staff members did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to Resident 2 who was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, are infection control interventions designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organism, MDROs - a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics) 2. One staff member did not clean and disinfect reusable blood pressure cuff in between resident use. These failures had the potential to cause the spread of infections to residents.
December 8, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during medication administration for three (Residents #8, #12, and #87) of nine residents observed during medication administration.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility document reviews, the facility failed to provide advance beneficiary notices 48 hours prior to discharge from Medicare Part A services for two (Resident #19 and Resident #21) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days of hospice services election for one (Resident #24) of one sampled resident reviewed for hospice services.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a pro re nata (PRN, as needed) psychotropic medication (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) order specified the duration of use or stop date for one (Resident #20) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not repackaged in one (third-floor medication cart) of two medication carts, and the facility failed to ensure an opened multi-dose vial was discarded in one (second-floor medication room) of one medication room observed.
October 25, 2019Standard inspection · 1 citation
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was maintained in the kitchen when a kitchen staff member handled dirty dishes and then handled clean dishes without washing hands in between. This could potentially spread infectious microorganisms in a vulnerable population.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on September 11, 2025, 3 on December 8, 2023, 6 on October 25, 2019.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.51 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.58 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.67 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.26 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.0% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 14.3% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.10 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 41% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.75 in April to June 2025 to 4.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.51 | 1.58 | 5.10 | 3.03 | 6.2% | 2 of 90 | 20 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.70 | 1.66 | 5.08 | 3.73 | 8.0% | 0 of 92 | 22 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.85 | 1.30 | 5.12 | 4.15 | 7.0% | 7 of 92 | 21 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.75 | 0.93 | 5.01 | 4.10 | 6.5% | 5 of 91 | 22 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 43.8 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.0 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.9 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SEQUOIA LIVING INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoia Living Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/25/1984 |
| McVey, Sarah | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Ziaie Matin, Maryam | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Friesen, Paul | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/03/2022 | |
| Tumbale, Terence | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/11/2021 | |
| Agostino, Valerie | Corporate director | Individual | 12/07/2020 | |
| Corriea, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 05/19/2021 | |
| Herman, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Howie, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2011 | |
| Ito, Holly | Corporate director | Individual | 10/25/2022 | |
| Jamison, David | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2014 | |
| Lim, Marianne | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2020 | |
| Lynn, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 04/29/2020 | |
| Mayeda, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Sanderson, Cory | Corporate director | Individual | 05/29/2024 | |
| Spaulding, Dianne | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2014 | |
| Suey, Marilyn | Corporate director | Individual | 05/22/2023 | |
| Atwood, Martha | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/03/1994 | |
| McVey, Sarah | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/24/2019 | |
| Shoemake, Charles | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/14/2020 | |
| Tumbale, Terence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/18/2024 | |
| Atwood, Martha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 | |
| Friesen, Paul | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 | |
| McVey, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 | |
| Shoemake, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 | |
| Tumbale, Terence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 | |
| Ziaie Matin, Maryam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.03 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- South Marin Health & Wellness Center Greenbrae, 0.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP San Rafael, 2.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- The Redwoods, a Community of Seniors Mill Valley, 3.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Marin Post Acute San Rafael, 4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Villa Marin San Rafael, 4.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Pine Ridge Care Center San Rafael, 4.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Northgate Postacute Care San Rafael, 4.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 65 citations
- Professional Post Acute Center San Rafael, 4.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 62 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Tamalpais's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Tamalpais 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Tamalpais get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 11, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has The Tamalpais been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does The Tamalpais accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns The Tamalpais?
- CMS lists 27 owners and managers. Legal business name: SEQUOIA LIVING INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.