Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Smithville

Towers Nursing Home

372 Hill Road, Smithville, TX 78957 · Bastrop County · (512) 237-4606

120 certified beds, about 111 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675942 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 31, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since April 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,239 in the last three years; the largest was $15,239, and the latest is dated August 20, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.59 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.21 of those hours.

58.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
1K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 11, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents was provided the required assistance with eating resulted in poor intake, however, the resident met identified weight services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 residents ( Resident # 1 ) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with supervision and assistance during meal service on 06/11/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of dehydration and malnutrition.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in response to one (Resident #1) of three Residents with unknown COVID 19 status. The facility failed to appropriately screen and test Resident #1 for signs, symptoms, and exposure of COVID-19. This failure placed residents at risk of exposure to COVID-19, which could result in illness, and hospitalization.
April 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or promote wound healing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide treatments on 03/19/2026 and 03/25/2026 to a pressure ulcer on Resident #1 buttocks. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's urinary drainage bag tubing and bag were kept from touching and resting on the floor. This failure could place residents with indwelling catheters at risk of developing infections.
January 29, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, for 1 (Resident #01) reviewed care plans. The facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan to reflect Resident #01 received IV fluids for dehydration. This failure could have placed residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met.
July 31, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 2 (Resident # 27 and Resident #30) out of 8 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed on 07/29/2025 to ensure Resident # 27 and Resident #30's call light was within reach to use. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance and could result in needs not being met.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident# 30 and Resident # 65) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed on 07/29/2025to ensure Resident #30, and Resident #65's fingernails were cleaned. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 1, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for two of six residents (Resident #10 and Resident #93) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure: MA B followed good nursing practices when preparing medications to prevent cross contamination of oral medications for Resident #93 on 07/30/2025 when MA B failed to perform hand hygiene and don gloves prior to touching Resident #93's medications with contaminated, ungloved hands. [...]
August 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. K
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's glucose was monitored, and insulin was administered regularly from 07/21/24 - 08/02/24. She was sent to the ER on [DATE] with a glucose level of 649 and a diagnosis of DKA. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 08/02/24 and ended on 08/09/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization.
June 6, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for one (Resident #45) of thirty-three residents reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #45 was assisted by two care providers during peri-care resulting in her rolling out of the bed onto the floor and sustaining facial lacerations. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and injury. Findings Include: Review of Resident #45's Face Sheet dated 06/05/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: [...]
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to date a box of bananas in the dry storage area which contained a banana that was open and rotted. The facility failed to ensure that no food products or food product boxes were stored on the floor in the facility's walk-in refrigerator and freezer. The facility failed to ensure that a food product in the freezer was in a sealed bag to prevent direct exposure to air. The facility failed to discard of food products that were past indicated use by dates per facility policy. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, and foodborne illness.
  3. E
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 2 (Residents #94 and Resident #28) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control A) The facility failed to follow the antibiotic stewardship recommendations for Resident #94. B) The facility failed to follow the antibiotic stewardship recommendations for Resident #28 This deficient practice could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use and increased antibiotic-resistant infections.
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to complete preadmission screening for a resident with a mental disorder. The facility failed to review and correct a PASSR evaluation for Resident #45 . This failure could result in the resident not receiving correct and approved treatments, medications and quality of life enhancements.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents, in that: Resident 29 was not provided fingernail care. This failure affected one resident and could place her at risk of infection and diminished self-esteem.
  6. D
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for Resident #6. The facility failed to assess and properly label Resident #6's peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) This failure could place residents at risk of infection, infiltration, and not receiving appropriate PIV care.
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 7, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #65 and Resident #81) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care. A) The facility failed to ensure that Resident #65's oxygen tubing with nasal cannula was changed out every seven days. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #65's Nebulizer tubing and mask, which included the nebulizing chamber (unit into which liquid medicine is converted into aerosol or mist by the pressurized air pumped through the tubing), was replaced every seven (7) days and bagged. The facility further failed to ensure that the air filter on Resident #65's air concentrator filter was free of dust and debris. [...]
April 19, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on July 31, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · July 31, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 20, 2024Fine $15,239

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.593.393.86
Registered nurses0.210.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.322.983.42
Nurse aides1.55
Licensed practical nurses0.83
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.8%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.70 on weekdays and 2.32 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.68 in April to June 2025 to 2.59 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.590.212.702.32 0.0%0 of 90111
Oct to Dec 20252.580.202.672.36 0.0%0 of 92111
Jul to Sep 20252.480.232.592.22 0.0%0 of 92115
Apr to Jun 20252.680.212.792.39 0.0%4 of 91115
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.015.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.614.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.13.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.39.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.625.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.312.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.02.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.32.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SMITHVILLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Smithville Hospital Authority5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/27/2016
Regency IHS of Smithville Towers LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Dwd Tx Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center IncIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Reg Bridge Opco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Reg Hg Opco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Reg Operator Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Regency Texas Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/27/2016
Baird, DanielManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/13/2021
Bunte, MarkManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/27/2020
Clapp, BarbaraManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/10/2021
Fulcher, AnnManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/22/2015
Gibson, PatriciaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/01/2021
Mandelbaum, ElliotManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2025
Wilson, LindaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual07/19/2023
Wilson, LindaCorporate officerIndividual07/19/2023
Regency IHS of Smithville Towers LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/27/2016
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/27/2016
Smithville Hospital AuthorityOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/27/2016
Dekowski, DonovanOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/27/2016
Gray, ColeOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/17/2025
Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/27/2016
Regency IHS of Smithville Towers LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/16/2025
Regency IHS Rehab LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/27/2016
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/16/2025
Smithville Hospital AuthorityAdp of the SNFOrganization06/16/2025
Chudleigh, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dekowski, DonovanAdp of the SNFIndividual06/27/2016
Gray, ColeAdp of the SNFIndividual03/17/2025
Migl, GinaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Ognowski, DustinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 29, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 31, 2025: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.32 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Towers Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Towers Nursing Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Towers Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 31, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Towers Nursing Home been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,239 in the last three years.
Does Towers Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Towers Nursing Home?
CMS lists 34 owners and managers, and links the home to Wellsential Health. Legal business name: SMITHVILLE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection