What is Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab get at its last inspection?

11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.

Has Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab?

CMS lists 32 owners and managers, and links the home to Valley West Health. Legal business name: WALNUT CREEK PA OPCO LLC.

Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab: Inspections & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 14, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since March 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.82 of those hours.

43.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).

CMS links it to Valley West Health, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

103/24

206/24

405/25

1105/26

106/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

10D

Potential for minimal harm

June 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation

G

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility documentation; and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to create an environment free from neglect by transferring a resident improperly, resulting in actual harm when the resident suffered an unsurvivable subdural hematoma (type of brain bleed in which the blood pools between the skull and the brain and is usually caused by head trauma) that required medical treatment at a hospital for one of three residents reviewed (Closed Record Resident CR17). This deficiency is cited as past non-compliance.

May 14, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations

E

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's dignity was maintained for five of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R18, R62, R89, R110, and R122).
E

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies and documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a clean environment and maintain resident equipment in good repair in two of five resident Units (Unit 2 and Unit 4).
E

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for four of seven residents reviewed (Residents R10, R18, R31, and R68).
E

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and order summary to the resident and/or representative for four of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R18, R31, R101, and R122).
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of a facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary operations in the main kitchen and failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in the main kitchen and two resident pantries reviewed (Neighborhoods 200 and 300).
D

Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

F627 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized discharge planning process that addressed residents' discharge goals and incorporated those goals into the resident's comprehensive care plan for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R78).
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive care plan to reflect the individualized discharge planning process that addressed residents' discharge goals for one of 26 residents (Resident R78).
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, investigative reports, facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete thorough fall investigations for one of two residents reviewed for falls (Resident R3).
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote cleanliness and help prevent the spread of infection regarding respiratory care equipment for one of two residents reviewed with respiratory care (Resident R15).
D

Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.

F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage into the dumpster properly for one dumpster observed outside of the building.
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation regarding supplemental oxygen usage and wound dressing changes on two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents R15 and R101).

May 22, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of Minimum Data Sets (MDS - federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care), clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that MDS assessments accurately reflected the status of three of 22 residents reviewed (Residents R2, R35, and R109).
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain dishwashing machine water temperatures in accordance with manufacturer recommendations for food service safety for the kitchen dishwasher and failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety in one of five unit refrigerators reviewed (Neighborhood 4).
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to safely secure medications on one of five nursing unit medication carts (Neighborhood Three medication cart).
D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R44).

June 28, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations

D

Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide resident privacy during medication administration for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R22).
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 29, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, manufacturer's guidelines, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the opportunity for potential unauthorized access of medications and to appropriately discard outdated medications for two of two medication carts reviewed (Neighborhood 300 and Neighborhood 400).

March 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

E

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 15, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy, and facility documentation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation as related to bathing and meal intake for 13 of 14 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, and R18).

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 14, 2026, 1 on May 22, 2025, 3 on June 28, 2024.

Every fire safety citation7 citations

F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · May 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

K 521 · May 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.

K 741 · May 14, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.

K 761 · May 22, 2025 · deficient, provider has
F
Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

K 324 · June 28, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · June 28, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
B
Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.

K 293 · June 28, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.60	3.89	3.86
Registered nurses	0.82	0.79	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.37	3.53	3.42
Nurse aides	2.04
Licensed practical nurses	0.74
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	43.0%	44.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	56.5%	39.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.70 on weekdays and 3.37 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 16.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.60 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.60	0.82	3.70	3.37	16.4%	0 of 90	104
Oct to Dec 2025	3.68	0.73	3.80	3.38	13.3%	0 of 92	104
Jul to Sep 2025	3.50	0.63	3.61	3.22	10.9%	0 of 92	107
Apr to Jun 2025	3.61	0.65	3.72	3.34	9.2%	0 of 91	104
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026	3.69	0.65	3.82	3.34	11.3%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: PDE Approved NATCEP by County, as of March 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Walnut Creek Healthcare and Rehab Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Pennsylvania

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Pennsylvania, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$21.44	$18.88 to $22.52	67,740
LPNs and LVNs	$30.74	$29.02 to $35.01	38,260
Registered nurses	$46.36	$38.75 to $50.35	146,520
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	11.3	16.8	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.3	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.7	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.3	3.1	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.5	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.6	17.0	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.8	4.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	12.5	17.7	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	22.8	22.5	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	14.3	9.5	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	2.5	1.6	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.4	1.2	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

49.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

39.3% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WALNUT CREEK PA OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Valley West Health, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Western Pa Opco Holdings I LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	10/29/2024
Andrews, Heather	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/03/2021
Finn, Nicholas	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/03/2021
Linam, Kim	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/27/2023
Rasmussen-Jones, Holly	Managing control - governing body	Individual		09/26/2016
Valley West Health LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		11/15/2024
Western Pa Opco Holdings I LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization		10/29/2024
Franco, Aharon	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/29/2024
Gade, James	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/29/2024
Rami, Isaac	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/29/2024
Sweeney, Megan	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/29/2024
Velez, Joshua	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/29/2024
Karity, Sarah	Trustee of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024
Beverly Enterprises LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/20/2018
Beverly Health and Rehabilitiation Services, Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/29/2024
Drumm Intermediary Sub Co LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		06/18/2017
Drumm Merger Co	Adp of the SNF	Organization		06/18/2017
Drumm Merger Co Sub LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		06/18/2017
Fillmore Strategic Investors LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		09/27/2016
Pearl Senior Care, LLC.	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/20/2018
Spectra Healthcare Alliance VI LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		06/19/2008
Spectra Healthcare Alliance, Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		05/20/2020
Surety Compliance	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/29/2024
Valley West Health LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		11/15/2024
Washington State Investment Board	Adp of the SNF	Organization		03/15/2006
Western Pa Opco Holdings I LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		10/29/2024
Franco, Aharon	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024
Gade, James	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024
Miller, Jean	Adp of the SNF	Individual		11/15/2024
Rami, Isaac	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024
Sweeney, Megan	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024
Velez, Joshua	Adp of the SNF	Individual		10/29/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.37 hours per resident per day, below the Pennsylvania average of 3.53.

Other nursing homes nearby

Lecom at Presque Isle, Inc
Erie, 0.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Forestview
Erie, 1.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 3 citations
Millcreek Manor
Erie, 1.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Greenfield Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Erie, 1.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 54 citations
Lecom at Elmwood Gardens, LLC
Erie, 2.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
Lecom at Asbury Ridge Dba Saint Mary's Asbury Ridg
Erie, 3.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
Sarah Reed Senior Living
Erie, 3.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Lecom at Village Square, LLC
Erie, 3.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations

Assisted living and personal care homes in Erie

Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.

Springhill Senior Living Community
Erie, 1.2 mi · licensed for 44 · personal care home
Parkside at Elmwood
Erie, 2.3 mi · licensed for 35 · personal care home
Westlake Woods Al
Erie, 3 mi · licensed for 79 · assisted living residence
Saint Mary's at Asbury Ridge
Erie, 3.4 mi · licensed for 164 · personal care home
Lecom Parkside at Glenwood
Erie, 3.4 mi · licensed for 144 · personal care home

Assisted living and personal care homes in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department of Aging, 717-783-8975. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Pennsylvania Department of Health Nursing Care Facility Locator, where Pennsylvania publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab get at its last inspection?: 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
Has Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Walnut Creek Nursing and Rehab?: CMS lists 32 owners and managers, and links the home to Valley West Health. Legal business name: WALNUT CREEK PA OPCO LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.