Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall
210 Cumberlidge Ave, King, WI 54946 · Waupaca County · (715) 258-5586
192 certified beds, about 184 residents a day · Government - State · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525718 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 17, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 16 health citations since January 2024, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $23,520 in the last three years; the largest was $23,520, and the latest is dated April 20, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.10 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.02 of those hours.
32.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
June 17, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the member environment was as free of accident hazards as possible when staff did not follow an intervention to prevent/reduce the impact of a fall for 1 member (M) (M121) of 6 sampled members. M121 had a history of falls. On 5/15/26, staff did not follow an intervention in M121's care plan to prevent recurrence when they did not lock M121's bed height adjustment with the bed in the lowest position. M121 fell out of bed, landed on their face, and required sutures in the left eyebrow. (This is being cited at past non-compliance.)
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure bowel management protocol was followed for 1 member (M) (M82) of 6 members reviewed for hospitalization in a total sample of 36 members. M82 did not receive as needed (PRN) bowel medication per facility protocol. On 5/18/26, M82 was transferred to the hospital for a small bowel obstruction. In addition, M82's care plan was not updated after the hospitalization.
April 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary care and services during a choking incident for 1 member (M) (M1) of 1 sampled member. M1 had diagnoses including anoxic brain damage and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and was noted to be impulsive with lack of judgement. M1 and M1's family requested that M1 receive a regular texture diet for pleasure and were aware of the risks and benefits. On 2/4/26, M1 put half of a peanut butter sandwich in M1's mouth when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-I stepped away to retrieve a towel. Staff noted M1 was choking but did not call 911 due to M1's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status. M1 became pulseless and non-breathing and passed away due to the incident. [...]
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and member interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure adaptive eating/drinking equipment was used during meal time to prevent burns for 2 Members (M2 and M6) of 3 sampled members. M2 did not receive coffee in a covered mug during supper on 3/1/26. M2 attempted to transfer the coffee from the uncovered mug to an insulated mug with a cover. The coffee spilled in M2's lap and resulted in burns to M2's bilateral thighs. (This example is being cited at a level G.)M6 did not receive coffee in a covered mug during lunch on 4/8/26.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 member (M) (M3) of 1 sampled member. M3 made physical abuse allegations against staff on 12/15/25 and 1/3/26. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegations of abuse.
March 19, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- G Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility was not free of significant medication errors for 2 residents (R) (R54 and R170) of 11 sampled residents. R54 received five extra doses of baclofen (a medication used to treat muscle spasms) on 1/15/25 and 1/16/25 due to a transcription error. R54 experienced overdose symptoms that required emergency transport and admission to the hospital on 1/17/25. R170 was administered double the ordered dose of long-acting insulin on 3/1/25 and 3/2/25.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 176 residents residing in the facility. Food items for resident consumption were not appropriately labeled and/or were beyond the discard date. Equipment in the main kitchen was not in clean condition and/or covered.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a call light was within reach for 1 resident (R) (R118) of 35 sampled residents. On 3/17/25, R118 did not have a call light within reach.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R73) of 3 sampled residents. On 12/19/24, R73 reported that $150 was missing from R73's room. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of care and treatment to prevent urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 1 resident (R) (R54) of 3 sampled residents. Staff did not provide suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the abdomen) site care for R54.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R) (R147) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. R147 did not have a physician order for oxygen therapy.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 residents (R) (R79 and R72) of 3 sampled residents. R79 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). On 3/18/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D did not wear a gown during catheter care for R79. R72 was on EBP. On 3/8/25, LPN-D did not wear a gown while administering medications via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) to R72.
January 31, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure kitchen equipment was monitored appropriately to ensure food safety. This practice had the potential to affect all 164 residents residing in the facility. Mechanical warewashing wash, sanitization, and internal surface temperature logs were not consistently completed. Cooking and cooling temperature logs for food cooked in the oven were not consistently completed. Logs that documented parts per million (PPM) of the sanitizing solution in sanitizer buckets and sanitization levels in the 3 compartment sink were not consistently completed.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive resident-centered care plan was developed for 1 Resident (R) (R118) of 32 sampled residents. R118 expressed delusional statements. The facility did not assess for the validity of the statements or develop a comprehensive care plan with individualized interventions to address the delusional statements.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure monitoring of high-risk medications for 1 Resident (R) (R41) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. R41's medical record did not contain monitoring documentation for adverse reactions to anticoagulant and opioid medications.
January 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure pathology results were processed in a timely manner for 1 Resident (R) (R3) of 1 resident reviewed. R3 had a skin biopsy on 5/16/23. The biopsy results were received by the facility on 6/5/23. The facility did not act on or ensure R3 was updated on the biopsy results until 8/1/23.
Fire safety inspections
25 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 17, 2026, 13 on March 19, 2025, 10 on January 31, 2024.
Every fire safety citation25 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Establish policies and procedures for sheltering.
- F Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- F Establish emergency prep training and testing.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 20, 2026 | Fine | $23,520 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.10 | 4.21 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.02 | 0.99 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.59 | 3.77 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.40 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.68 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.6% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 19.3% | 39.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.31 on weekdays and 4.59 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 35.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.59 in April to June 2025 to 5.10 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.10 | 1.02 | 5.31 | 4.59 | 35.1% | 0 of 90 | 184 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.91 | 1.00 | 5.07 | 4.50 | 34.8% | 0 of 92 | 185 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.85 | 1.02 | 5.03 | 4.41 | 33.2% | 0 of 92 | 187 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.59 | 1.06 | 4.77 | 4.14 | 28.4% | 0 of 91 | 181 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 0.95 | 4.36 | 3.74 | 8.8% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Wisconsin | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.6 | 16.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 18.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.4 | 15.8 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: STATE OF WISCONSIN.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State of Wisconsin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2014 |
| Bond, James | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Parker, James | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/22/2012 | |
| Servatius, Tammy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/14/2025 | |
| State of Wisconsin | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2014 | |
| Bond, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Britz, Bette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/04/2015 | |
| Butterfield, Brad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/04/2024 | |
| Cooney, Colt | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Fay, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/28/2024 | |
| Fernandez, Gina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/14/2024 | |
| Flack, Nicole | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/15/2020 | |
| Kaza, Thanmayi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/31/2023 | |
| Kimball, Polly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/11/2012 | |
| Mork, Caitlin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/04/2021 | |
| Parker, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/22/2012 | |
| Petry, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/04/2026 | |
| Schulz, Jodie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/23/2023 | |
| Servatius, Tammy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/14/2025 | |
| Steingraber, Joni | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/30/2025 | |
| Thibodeau, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/23/2011 | |
| State of Wisconsin | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2014 | |
| Bond, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/09/2023 | |
| Britz, Bette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/04/2015 | |
| Butterfield, Brad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/04/2024 | |
| Cooney, Colt | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Fay, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/28/2024 | |
| Fernandez, Gina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2024 | |
| Flack, Nicole | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/15/2020 | |
| Kaza, Thanmayi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/31/2023 | |
| Kimball, Polly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/11/2012 | |
| Mork, Caitlin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/04/2021 | |
| Parker, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/22/2012 | |
| Petry, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/04/2026 | |
| Schulz, Jodie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/23/2023 | |
| Servatius, Tammy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2025 | |
| Steingraber, Joni | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/30/2025 | |
| Thibodeau, Brian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/23/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 17, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 20, 2026: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Wi Veterans Hm Ainsworth Hall King, 0 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Bethany Home Waupaca, 2.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Avina of Weyauwega Weyauwega, 10.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Manawa Com Nur Ctr Manawa, 12.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- St. Joseph Residence New London, 18.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Stevens Point Health Services Stevens Point, 24.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 48 citations
- Timber Ridge Health and Rehabilitation Stevens Point, 24.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Division of Quality Assurance, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Wisconsin Board on Aging and Long Term Care, Ombudsman Program, 1-800-815-0015. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Wisconsin DHS Provider Search (Survey History), where Wisconsin publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on June 17, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
- Has Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $23,520 in the last three years.
- Does Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Wi Veterans Home Moses Hall?
- CMS lists 38 owners and managers. Legal business name: STATE OF WISCONSIN.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.