Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Edinburg

Windsor Arbor View

218 Baltic Ave, Edinburg, TX 78539 · Hidalgo County · (956) 316-2533

120 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676206 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 17, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 23 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years; the largest was $8,281, and the latest is dated September 11, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.

41.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
19D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 31, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 3, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident needs, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan reflected his weight bearing status since admission on [DATE] and it was not initiated on his care plan until 07/09/26 (discharge date ). This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their needs.
June 5, 2026Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    F559 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to receive written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility was changed for for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received written notice prior to a room change on 03/04/26 and 04/07/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life being in a new environment.
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure MA A did not administer Resident #1's blood pressure altering medication on 05/23/26 when his blood pressure was not within the required parameters per the physician's order. This failure could place residents at an increased risk for complications, exacerbation of symptoms and disease process, and potential hospitalization.
  3. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure MA A documented Resident #1's blood pressure on the MAR when the resident's blood pressure altering medication was not administered because it was outside the parameters for administration on 05/29/26. This failure could place residents at risk for errors in care and treatment.
December 17, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 residents out of 8 (Resident #77, Resident #50, Resident #26) that were reviewed for safe environment. The facility failed to ensure bathroom sink water temperatures were between 100-110 degrees Fahrenheit in occupied rooms for Resident #77, Resident #50 and Resident #26. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment and water temperatures over 110 degrees Fahrenheit, placing residents at risk of being in an unsafe environment and at risk for burn injuries. The Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #77's face sheet dated 12/17/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her pertinent diagnoses included: [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #29, Resident #117, and Resident #9) observed for infection control issues in that: 1. LVN H did not put on PPE when she entered Resident #29's room who was on contact precautions. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #117's breathing mask for his nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medicine into mist that could be inhaled through a face mask) was properly stored when not in use on 12/15/2025. 3. CNA A failed to hand sanitize before entering and after exiting Resident #9's room. Resident #9 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. [...]
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1of 8 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not stand while assisting Resident #44 with lunch on 12/15/25. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having the right to a dignified existence maintained.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of eight residents (Resident #44 and Resident #9) reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. RN G failed to reposition Resident #9 using two employees as required by his care plan. 2. The facility left meal tray within reach for Resident #44 who required assistance with feeding allowing resident to reach drinks on tray. These failures place residents who require assistance with feeding and repositioning at risk of accidents and possible injuries.
  5. D
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. (Resident #96) The facility failed on 12/15/2025 to ensure the dressing on Resident #96's peripheral intravenous line (a short flexible tube inserted into the vein to administer fluids and medications) was dated and initialed. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate IV care and services.
  6. D
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    F925 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 2 of 26 residents (Resident #43 and Resident #54) reviewed for effective pest control. The facility failed to ensure Residents #43 and #54's room was free of pests. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to bugs and bug bites.
December 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure LVN B documented on Resident #1's electronic medical record that her foley catheter was re-inserted on 11/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care through inadequate documentation resulting in deterioration in condition, exacerbation of disease process, overmedication, and increased risk of harm or injury.
September 11, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that:The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received adequate supervision to prevent him from exiting the facility undetected on 06/06/25. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 06/06/25 and ended on 06/07/2025. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. Past Non-Compliance form sent to Administrator on 09/11/25 at 11:49 am. This failure could place the residents at risk for injury or death.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations including abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (which included to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting alleged allegation of abuse. [...]
  3. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents by 1 of 1 nurse (LVN E) reviewed for accuracy and completeness of clinical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN E correctly completed Resident #1's assessment on 01/26/25 after her knees gave out and resident was assisted to the floor. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by adequately trained nurses and could result in a decline in health.
February 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutritional status. The facility failed to initiate timely interventions to prevent weight loss when Resident #1 experienced significant weight loss of -6.95% (13 pounds) between the dates of 01/10/25 and 02/06/25. This failure could place residents who are dependent on staff for their nutrition and hydration at risk for nutritional deficit, weight loss, skin breakdown, and overall decline in quality of life.
September 25, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for storage, preparation and sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that food/ drink items in the reach- in freezer, refrigerator, and dry storage area were properly stored, labeled, and dated and were not expired. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination.
  2. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preference for one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had the call light within reach while in bed in his room. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance or help when needed and in the event of an emergency.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Resident #101, Resident #108, and Resident #1) of 4 residents observed for Infection Control. 1. CNA A failed to follow proper infection control while providing incontinent care to Resident #101. 2. CNA B failed to follow proper infection control while providing incontinent care to Resident #108. 3. The facility failed to prevent Resident#1's urinary catheter tubing (bag) from touching the floor. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
July 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was coded in the MDS for a fall on 10/18/23. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was coded in the MDS for a fall on 4/4/24. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
June 22, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 out of 2 residents receiving breathing treatments that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' needs, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans belonging to Resident #68 and Resident #10. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #10 and Resident #68 to include their breathing treatments. These failures could place residents at risk for their medical, physical, and psychosocial needs not being met.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure review and revision of comprehensive care plans for 1 resident (Resident #72) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions in that: The facility failed to review and revise Resident #72's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the initiation of Haldol Decanoate, an antipsychotic medication. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
  3. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 (Resident #72) of 13 residents whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 was not prescribed Haldol Decanoate (an antipsychotic) without appropriate diagnosis for its use. This deficient practice could place residents without a diagnosis for taking psychotropic medications at risk for receiving unnecessary medications.
  4. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that; Water was observed on the floor of the walk in refrigerator. This failure could place staff at risk of injury while preparing meals for residents.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on June 22, 2023.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · June 22, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
September 11, 2025Fine $8,281

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.253.393.86
Registered nurses0.330.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.832.983.42
Nurse aides2.07
Licensed practical nurses0.85
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)41.4%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.250.333.422.83 0.0%0 of 90106
Oct to Dec 20253.230.313.362.90 0.0%0 of 92110
Jul to Sep 20253.100.353.262.70 0.0%0 of 92109
Apr to Jun 20253.010.303.182.57 0.0%0 of 91111
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.515.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.83.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.714.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.99.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.725.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.012.312.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: STARR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Starr County Hospital District5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/01/2017
218 Baltic Avenue LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Dwd Tx Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center IncIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Reg Leased Opco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Reg Operator Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Regency Texas Holdings LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization04/01/2017
Baird, DanielManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/13/2021
Clapp, BarbaraManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/10/2021
Gibson, PatriciaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual08/01/2021
Guerra, AdrianManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2016
Mandelbaum, ElliotManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2025
Munoz, ThaliaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/1982
Pena, ElisaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/01/2022
Salinas, ArcadioManaging control - governing bodyIndividual09/17/2024
Munoz, ThaliaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/1982
Starr County Hospital DistrictOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2017
Dekowski, DonovanOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2017
Reyes, AnaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/08/2024
218 Baltic Avenue LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2017
Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2017
Regency IHS Rehab LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/01/2017
Starr County Hospital DistrictAdp of the SNFOrganization04/14/2025
Alaniz, NitzaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dekowski, DonovanAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2017
Reyes, AnaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Silvera, RyanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Zepeda, AngelicaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 17, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.83 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Windsor Arbor View's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Windsor Arbor View 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Windsor Arbor View get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 17, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Windsor Arbor View been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years.
Does Windsor Arbor View accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Windsor Arbor View?
CMS lists 30 owners and managers, and links the home to Wellsential Health. Legal business name: STARR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection