4503 S Sugar Rd, Edinburg, TX 78539 · Hidalgo County · (956) 386-1112
126 certified beds, about 104 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676346 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 14, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $7,582 in the last three years; the largest was $7,582, and the latest is dated November 3, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.32 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
41.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be informed of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers, for 1 resident (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for consent for antipsychotic medications in that: Resident #1 was prescribed and administered olanzapine (Zyprexa)(an antipsychotic) without prior consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available. This failure could affect the right to self-determination of all facility residents who receive medication by allowing them to receive medication without their prior knowledge or consent, or that of their responsible party or emergency contacts.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to have an adequate indication for the use of the medication olanzapine (Zyprexa)(an antipsychotic) for Resident #1 before administering the medication with a black box warning. This failure could put residents at risk of harm from adverse reactions or harmful side effects. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from chemical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to send a copy of the residents' discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 77 of 81 of residents discharged from the facility for the first 3 months in 2026. The facility failed to send a copy of the residents' discharge notice, prior to discharge, to the representative of the Office of State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman These failures could place residents at risk of not knowing their rights and receiving the services of the state LTC Ombudsman. Findings Included: Record review of the monthly report of discharges dated 04/14/2026 provided by the Social Worker revealed out of a total of 81 residents discharged only 4 discharges of AMA were sent to the LTC Ombudsman for the months of January, February, and March of 2026. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure male kitchen staff were wearing beard restraints and wear them properly while in the kitchen.2. The facility failed to discard scratched non-stick pans. 3. The facility failed to wear gloves while cooking raw ground beef for consumption.4. The facility failed to ensure can opener was clean.5. The facility failed to ensure dinner rolls were covered while waiting for baking.6. The facility failed to ensure the air conditioning vents to be free of a black substance surrounding the vents and condensation. 7. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident#19) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to prevent Resident#19's urinary catheter tubing (bag) from touching the floor on 4/12/26. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's oxygen tubing was not touching the floor on 4/12/2026. 2. The facility failed to post an Oxygen sign indicating Resident #20 received oxygen on 4/12/2026. These deficient practices could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications, a decreased quality of care, and at risk of fire hazards by not posting oxygen signs outside the residents' rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 7 (100/200-hall and 300/400-halls) medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to store 5 loose tablets in their appropriate blister packs in the medication cart for halls 100 and 200 at 2:37 PM on 04/13/26. 2. The facility failed to store 8 loose tablets/capsules in their appropriate blister packs in the medication cart for halls 300 and 400 at 2:54 PM on 04/13/26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of losing medications leading to medication shortage.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for infection control. CNA B and CNA C failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for an indwelling catheter for Resident #20 on 4/12/26. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's debit card was secured resulting in 26 unauthorized transactions totaling $1,340.60. This failure could affect residents and their responsible party by preventing them from having access to their funds.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen management. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with a BIPAP machine as per doctor's orders. This deficient practice could place residents who receive respiratory care at an increased risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of life. Record review of the facility's PIR revealed Resident #1 did not have the BIPAP machine on during the night of 11/26/25. Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/18/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 08/01/25 and an initial admission date of 05/28/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #247) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #247's care plan revised on 01/17/25 reflected he required a mechanical lift to be transferred to and from bed. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for residents needs as identified through resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure LVN P documented resident #11's assessment on 01/29/25 after CNA O informed her she had noticed redness on Resident #11's leg. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk of not having assessments documented resulting in potential delayed treatment and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R# 1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent CNA A, from verbally abusing R#1 on 05/20/24 when she used obscene language. This failure could place residents at risk of emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #73) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to conduct 11 quarterly care plan meetings to discuss Resident #73's care since his admission in 2021. This failure could cause residents not to be able to participate in the planning of their care, not receiving the care they want or need, and not being informed of all services offered by the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 4 of 12 residents (Residents #2, #34, #55, and #97) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) was executed correctly as it was not signed by witnesses or a physician and there were no dates on the form. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's OOH-DNR was executed correctly as the physician's printed signature and license number were missing from the form. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's OOH-DNR was executed correctly as it was not signed by the responsible party and there was no date the form was signed. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #97's OOH-DNR was in the medical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who was licensed or registered by the state for 1 of 1 Activity Director reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure the AD was qualified to serve as the director of the activities program. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #15, #55 and #97) reviewed for hospice services, in that: 1. The facility failed to obtain Resident #15's most recent hospice Plan of Care and documentation by specific interdisciplinary hospice staff providing services to the resident. 2. The facility failed to obtain Resident #55's most recent hospice Plan of Care and documentation by specific interdisciplinary hospice staff providing services to the resident. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 15 of 26 employees (CNA C, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, LVN L, LVN M, LVN N, RN O, PT P, the FNSD and the AD) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure that quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to CNA C, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA J, CNA K, LVN L, LVN M, LVN N, RN O, PT P, the FNSD and the AD. This failure could place residents at risk of staff not being aware of the facility's QAPI processes that focus on the outcomes of care and quality of life due to a lack of training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental, nursing, and psychosocial needs and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including the right to refuse treatment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to implement Resident #15's comprehensive person-centered care plan to address oxygen use and therapy services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 of 7 residents (R#20 and 80), reviewed for care plan revisions, in that: R#20 requested an activity preference while in isolation that did not result in the revision of CP involving activities and CP was not revised. R#80 requested an activity preference while in COVID-19 isolation that did not result in the revision of CP involving activities and CP was not revised. These failures could place residents at risk for lack of coordination of services and activity preferences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident preferences for individual activities and independent activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for 2 of 7 residents (R#20 and R#80), reviewed for activity preferences, in that: R#20's activity preference was not provided while he was in an isolation room. R#80's activity preference was not provided while she was isolated for COVID-19. These failures could affect residents' psychosocial well-being and could lead to a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one resident (#1) of two residents observed for infection control in that: 1. CNA B failed to doff her soiled gloves after performing peri care for Resident #1 and before grabbing a clean sheet and brief for the resident. 2. CNA B failed to sanitize her hands prior to donning new gloves while performing peri care for Resident #1. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive incontinent care and could result in cross contamination of germs and could result in a urinary tract infection (a painful infection of the urinary system, which includes the kidneys, bladder, urethra, and ureters).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) of seven (6) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to develop and implement interventions to prevent Resident #1 's elopement from the facility. Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 03/31/23 and was returned to the facility by local police department. The non-compliance was identified as Past Non-Compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/31/2023 and ended on 03/31/2023. The facility corrected the non-compliance before the investigation began. This deficient practice could place the residents at risk for harm, serious injury or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to report the findings from their investigations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment to HHSC within 5 working days for 4 out of 9 reviewed for incident and accident reporting. The facility failed to submit a Provider Investigation Report (Form 3613-A) to HHSC for four reported incidents on: - 03/31/23 involving an allegation of resident neglect - 04/09/23 involving an allegation of infection control - 06/17/23 involving an allegation of pharmaceutical services - 07/18/23 involving an allegation of infection control This deficient practice could place all residents at risk of incidents not being investigated or reported to HHSC.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 24 residents (Resident # 2) being reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that narcotics were reconciled as being given from the resident's eMAR to the resident's narcotic reconciliation form on the medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their narcotic medications and drug diversions.
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on April 14, 2026.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 3, 2023 | Fine | $7,582 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.32 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.97 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.05 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.99 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 2.97 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.30 in April to June 2025 to 3.32 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.32 | 0.43 | 3.47 | 2.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 104 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.19 | 0.36 | 3.30 | 2.90 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.39 | 0.43 | 3.52 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.30 | 0.42 | 3.41 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 97 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program (state list: HHSC Approved NATCEP Providers, as of October 6, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hidalgo Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (61.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
61.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 83 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
54.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: UVALDE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency IHS of Hidalgo LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Garza, Senovio | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Martinez, Celeste | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Melendez, Ivan | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Munoz, Naptaly | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Csv Rhea Management Holdco, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Reg Leased Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Baird, Daniel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Apolinar, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/23/2015 | |
| Contreras, Terri | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/29/2019 | |
| Elliott, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/13/2016 | |
| Faglie, Kelly | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/31/2017 | |
| Gonzales, Hector | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/27/2001 | |
| Regency IHS of Hidalgo LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Uvalde County Hospital Authority | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2022 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Garza, Senovio | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency IHS of Hidalgo LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/19/2025 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/01/2024 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/19/2025 | |
| Uvalde County Hospital Authority | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/19/2025 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2021 | |
| Garza, Senovio | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Martinez, Celeste | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Melendez, Ivan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 | |
| Munoz, Naptaly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.