What is Ada Care Center's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Ada Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Ada Care Center get at its last inspection?

7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 5, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.

Has Ada Care Center been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Ada Care Center accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Ada Care Center?

CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to IHS Management Consultants. Legal business name: ADA CARE CENTER LLC.

Ada Care Center: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 5, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.

CMS links it to IHS Management Consultants, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

411/23

502/25

706/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

June 5, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1) food was labeled with the open date and the expiration date for 1 of 2 kitchen observations and 2) expired foods were discarded for 1 of 2 refrigerators. The failure had the likelihood to affect the 38 residents in the facility.
F

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure:- staff performed hand hygiene between handling soiled and clean items during wound care/dressing changes for 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #44) of 2 residents observed for dressing changes/wound care;- staff performed hand hygiene between providing direct care to 2 (Resident #28 and Resident #24) of 5 sampled residents observed for hand hygiene during care;- staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during care of residents who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 (Resident #34 and Resident #28) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for EBP.- staff performed hand hygiene between residents during food and beverage services for residents who resided on 1 (East Hall) of 3 halls; [...]
E

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteCitation Form for QAFacility: Ada Care CenterSurveyor: [NAME] 51215Tag: F655S/S: EList other surveyors citing this tag: [NAME] and [NAME] AgarwalWho is writing the deficient practice statement? [NAME] Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate baseline care plans within 48 hours for 4 of 7 residents (Residents #4, #25, #28, and #44).
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure the most recent resident assessment accurately reflected a resident's smoking status, which affected 1 (Resident #28) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards related to smoking.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care and 2 (Resident #25 and Resident #28) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards related to smoking.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a smoking safety assessment to determine the potential hazards or risks for 1 (Resident #25) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards related to smoking.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for the use and care of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine included ordered settings, which affected 1 (Resident #10) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care.

February 5, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations

E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate safety for smokers for two (#2 and #43) of two residents sampled for smoking safety. The administrator identified 20 residents who smoked.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was completely covered while being served. The administrator reported 57 residents received meals from the kitchen.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure proper disposal of the lancet and blood contaminated glucometer strip for one (#105) of two sampled residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring; b. to properly dispose of soiled PPE supplies for two (#2 and #204); and c. failed to use proper PPE for enhanced barrier precautions for one (#2) of five sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The administrator reported 59 residents resided in the facility. The DON reported 12 residents with blood glucose monitoring.
D

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise care plans related to smoking interventions for two (#2 and #43) of two residents sampled for smoking safety. The administrator identified 20 residents who smoked.
D

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) medication for anxiety had a documented rational for continued use beyond 14 days for one (#11) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The DON reported 14 residents received anti-anxiety medications.

November 28, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.

F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a registered nurse on duty eight hours a day and/or seven days a week. The administrator reported 55 residents resided in the facility.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of dry goods. The administrator reported 55 residents received services from the kitchen.
D

Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly assessment was completed within the required timeframe for one (#46) of 19 sampled residents' assessments reviewed. The administrator reported 55 residents resided in the facility.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of MDS assessments for one (#22) related to falls and for one (#23) related to CPAP machine usage of 19 sampled residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The administrator reported 55 residents resided in the facility.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 8 on June 5, 2026, 2 on February 5, 2025, 1 on November 28, 2023.

Every fire safety citation11 citations

F
Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.

K 362 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.

K 741 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Meet other general requirements.

K 100 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

K 222 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

K 511 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.

K 911 · June 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.

K 291 · February 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

K 344 · February 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.

K 912 · November 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	3.39	3.79	3.86
Registered nurses	0.40	0.34	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.08	3.44	3.42
Nurse aides	2.16
Licensed practical nurses	0.83
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	not reported	55.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	not reported	53.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	2

CMS expects 2.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.52 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.11 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	3.39	0.40	3.52	3.08	0.1%	0 of 90	35
Oct to Dec 2025	3.47	0.41	3.57	3.21	1.2%	0 of 92	36
Jul to Sep 2025	3.55	0.47	3.71	3.16	0.0%	0 of 69	29
Apr to Jun 2025	3.11	0.34	3.33	2.52	0.3%	4 of 19	46
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026	3.79	0.32	3.94	3.42	2.2%	1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$17.27	$15.82 to $18.39	19,410
LPNs and LVNs	$28.04	$24.06 to $29.84	11,540
Registered nurses	$39.87	$37.19 to $47.55	38,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oklahoma	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.1	13.6	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.5	1.9	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	23.1	2.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.8	4.7	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.1	1.8	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	26.4	13.7	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.4	4.7	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	19.2	17.5	15.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.2	2.3	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.9	3.0	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Ada Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

38.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.