Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
1856 Adams Lane, Zanesville, OH 43701 · Muskingum County · (740) 454-9769
114 certified beds, about 105 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365394 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 10, 2026, inspectors cited 20 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 37 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,610 in the last three years; the largest was $17,610, and the latest is dated July 23, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.80 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
46.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Certus Healthcare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
June 10, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 20 citations
- E Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to privacy of personal and clinical information. This affected four residents (#17, #29, #33, and #35) of 38 residents reviewed for personal privacy. The facility census was 107.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment. This was observed in four units (100, 200, 300 and 700) of seven units in the facility and affected five residents (#26, #33, #85, #97, and #107) of 107 residents reviewed for their environment. The census was 107.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and review of menus and recipes, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value. This affected four of four residents who received a pureed diet (Residents #9, #31, #33, and #80). The facility census was 107.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that resident personal food items were stored appropriately in nursing unit refrigerators. This affected Resident #79 but had the potential to affect the residents residing on four (Unit 300, 400, 600 and 700) of five nursing units. The facility census was 107. Observations on 06/03/26 at 8:30 A.M. of the nursing unit refrigerator on the 300/400 unit revealed two takeout food containers containing Chinese food and a burrito. The takeout containers were not labeled with a resident name and were not dated to indicate when they were placed in the refrigerator or when they were to be discarded. Observations on 06/03/26 at 8:35 A.M. of the nursing unit refrigerator on the 600 unit revealed a bag containing food from Taco Bell dated 05/28/26. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to maintain infection control principles as evidenced by open packages of incontinence products stored on the floor, gloves not being changed when needed while checking a finger stick blood sugar, not covering the end of a tube feeding line after unhooking it from a resident and not maintaining a resident's urinary catheter tubing off of the floor. This affected five resident's (#4, #43, #64, #85 and #92) of eight sampled for infection control. The facility census was 107.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity with use of an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#4) four residents observed with indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 107.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to individualize a resident's room to allow the resident to access all areas of the room. This affected one resident (#64) of one resident reviewed for reasonable accommodation of need. The facility census was 107.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified when a resident was transferred to the hospital. This affected one resident (#112) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 107.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from chemical restraints when a psychoactive medication was given without attempting non-pharmacological interventions and without adequate indication for use. This affected one resident (#103) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 107.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment for a resident with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#67) of 38 residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 107.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan. This affected one resident (#33) of 38 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 107.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed have timely care conferences and invite family to care conferences. This affected two residents (#3, #35) of five residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The census was 107.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for monitoring urinary output. This affected one resident (#4) of four residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 107.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, interview and review of the manufacture user guide, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered low air loss mattress for pressure ulcer prevention was was powered and inflated. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #27) of four residents reviewed for medical equipment. The census was 107.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure safety of residents was maintained. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #12) out of four residents reviewed for safety adaptive equipment for cigarette smoking, affected one resident (Resident #44) out two residents for safety while out on the facility's campus, and affected one resident (Resident #71) out three residents reviewed for bed mattress safety. The facility census was 107. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date 09/29/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, high blood pressure, depression, anxiety, and paraplegia. Review of Resident #12's smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was deemed supervision for smoking with no adaptive equipment or smoking apron required. [...]
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for flushing the gastrostomy tube (tube through the abdominal wall into the stomach for nutrition) during medication administration . This affected one (Resident #85) of one resident observed for medication administration through a gastrostomy tube. The census was 107.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within ordered physician parameters. This affected one (Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 107.
- D Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff, and resident interview, the facility failed to obtain dental services for one (Resident #3) of nine residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 107.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff, and resident interview, the facility failed to obtain dental services for one (Resident #10) of nine residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 107.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records related to pressure relieving interventions. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #27) of four residents reviewed for medical equipment. The census was 107. Findings Include:Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed admission date 12/31/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two Diabetes Mellites, heart failure, Alzheimer's Disease, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #27's signed physician orders revealed an order dated 11/06/25 for use of a Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress to bed. Check function/inflation every shift (QS). [...]
July 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, review of a facility self-reporting incident (SRI), review of the facility's related investigation, staff interview, resident interview, family interview, and review of the facility's Abuse Policy, the facility failed to protect Resident #14's right to be free from sexual abuse by Resident #97. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm beginning on 07/08/25 at 7:20 P.M. when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #119 observed Resident #97, who had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors engaged in non-consensual sexual intercourse with Resident #14, a cognitively impaired and non-interviewable female resident, who lacked the cognitive ability to provide consent to sexual activity. [...]
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe homelike environment for the 22 (Residents #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #62, #63, #64, #65, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, and #80) in the memory care unit when the unit was left with a black moldlike substance in the hallway, and there was a strong odor of urine noted throughout the unit. This affected 22 residents in memory care unit of 94 residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 94.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one (Resident # 87) out of 41 residents in EBP. The facility census was 94.
May 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, vendor staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medically necessary social services regarding discharge processes. This affected one (Resident #11) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The census was 108. Findings Include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were congestive heart failure, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, atrial fibrillation, gout, anemia, hypertension, anxiety disorder, glaucoma, bipolar disorder, fibromyalgia, COPD, and depression. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/14/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's quarterly care conference notes, dated 11/04/24, 01/27/25, and 04/21/25 revealed the facility addressed on-going discharge questions. [...]
February 19, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences when a bedside chair, a bedside nightstand, and a call light were not within reach. This affected one of 108 residents (#26). The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #26 had an admission date of 05/19/23 with diagnoses including: [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for two residents which allowed them to use their personal belongings to the extent possible This affected three residents (#33, #40, #75) of 108 residents residing in the facility. The census was 108. Findings Include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #40 had an admission date of 03/30/18 with diagnoses including: [...]
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-admission screening and resident reviews (PASSAR) were accurately completed. This affected one resident (#43) of two review for PASSAR accuracy. The census was 108.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for diuretic medication for Resident #60. This affected one resident (#60) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 108.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure medications were locked against unauthorized access. This had the potential to affect one resident (#97) of 10 residents on the 200 hallway identified as cognitively impaired and independently mobile. The census was 108.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain infection control with urinary catheters. This affected one resident (#3) of four residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The census was 108.
- B Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure written information prior to transfer to the hospital of the bed hold notice. This affected three residents (#61, #71 and #106) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 108.
September 6, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- J Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed medical record review, review of an emergency medical services (EMS) report, interviews with facility staff and review of facility Code Status policy the facility failed to immediately initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for Resident #94. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the actual serious life-threatening harm and death on [DATE] beginning at 5:22 A.M. when Resident #94, who had advance directives for cardiopulmonary resuscitation/full code status, was found unresponsive, without a pulse, and was not provided CPR. The facility notified EMS for hospital transport without completing a comprehensive assessment of the resident ' s status. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directive orders and documents were consistent in the medical record and reflective of the resident/resident representative wishes. This affected one (Resident #348) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 100.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was initiated when a resident was admitted to hospice services. This affected one (Resident #91) of 21 residents who were reviewed regarding requirements for significant change assessments. The census was 100.
- D Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, financial record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate plan to spend down resident finances when funds were above the Medicaid allowable limit. This affected three (Residents #19, #23, and #37) of six resident financial information reviewed. The census was 100. Findings Include: 1. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/16/23, revealed she had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #19's quarterly financial statements, dated 07/01/22 to 06/30/23, revealed her total amount in her resident account varied between $2986.96 and $7191.37; it was never below $2000. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, review of drug reference information and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately labeled and stored. This affected six residents (Resident #21, #29, #65, #67, #89 and #93) of 100 residents residing in the facility.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic stewardship guidelines were followed prior to antibiotic use. This affected one (Resident #299) of one resident reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. The census was 100. Findings Include: Resident #299 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were sepsis, rectal abscess, difficulty walking, type II diabetes, muscle weakness, chest pain, obesity, anemia, vitamin D deficiency, tobacco use, hypertension, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and headache. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/14/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #299 physician orders revealed she was prescribed Doxycycline Hyclate Oral Tablet 100 milligrams, twice daily for seven days. [...]
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 10, 2026, 3 on February 19, 2025, 2 on September 6, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have proper power supply for life support equipment.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have an externally vented heating system.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 23, 2025 | Fine | $17,610 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.80 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.35 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.45 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.07 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.98 on weekdays and 2.35 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.96 in April to June 2025 to 2.80 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.80 | 0.28 | 2.98 | 2.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 105 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.89 | 0.26 | 3.01 | 2.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.18 | 0.29 | 3.31 | 2.87 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 100 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.96 | 0.34 | 3.05 | 2.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 104 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.5 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ADAMS LANE OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Certus Healthcare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chm Oh West Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/28/2021 |
| Ohio Care Skld LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 12/28/2021 |
| Dipasqua, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/28/2021 | |
| Dundr, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fishman, Shmuel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/28/2021 | |
| Hawkins, Marcus | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dipasqua, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/28/2021 | |
| Dundr, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Fishman, Shmuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/28/2021 | |
| Hawkins, Marcus | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.35 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Continuing Healthcare at Cedar Hill Zanesville, 0.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Continuing Healthcare at Willow Haven Zanesville, 0.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 68 citations
- Oaks at Bethesda the Zanesville, 1.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Zanesville, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Altercare Zanesville Inc. Zanesville, 3.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Continuing Healthcare at Beckett House New Concord, 15.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- Altercare Somerset Inc. Somerset, 18 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Majestic Care of New Lexington New Lexington, 20.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 42 citations
Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Ohio Department of Health, Nursing Homes and Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Ohio Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 1-800-282-1206. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Ohio Long-Term Care Quality Navigator (Ohio Department of Aging), where Ohio publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 20 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 10, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
- Has Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,610 in the last three years.
- Does Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Adams Lane Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Certus Healthcare. Legal business name: ADAMS LANE OPCO LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.