5755 East Main Street, Mesa, AZ 85205 · Maricopa County · (480) 214-2400
38 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 035266 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Arizona average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.98 across Arizona and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.54 of those hours.
36.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arizona average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Advanced Health Care, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that written abuse policy and procedures were followed and adhered to regulations regarding the alleged abuse of one resident (Resident #20). This deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being appropriately handled.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #20) was reported to the State Agency (SA) in a timely manner. This deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being reported and investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to provide written notice to the resident or resident representative that specifies duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility for one resident (#48). The deficient practice could result in residents not being able to exercise their right to return to the facility of choice. Number of residents sampled: 12Number of residents cited:
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and facility failed to properly complete a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31. The deficient practice could result in delayed identification of potential risks and care needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#86, #26) were notified in writing regarding the reason for transfer and a copy was sent to the ombudsman.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical review, staff interviews and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#86) was permitted to return to the facility after a hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure two residents (#86, #26) were notified were made aware of the bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record, staff interviews and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene practices and PPE when providing wound care for one resident (#18). The deficient practice could result in infection.
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on October 18, 2024.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.25 | 3.98 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.54 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.59 | 3.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.5% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.5% | 43.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.52 on weekdays and 4.59 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.09 in April to June 2025 to 5.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.25 | 1.54 | 5.52 | 4.59 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 37 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.23 | 1.36 | 5.55 | 4.42 | 0.8% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.11 | 1.28 | 5.43 | 4.29 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.09 | 1.28 | 5.41 | 4.28 | 0.9% | 0 of 91 | 37 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arizona, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.87 | 0.63 | 4.05 | 3.43 | 3.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $18.43 to $22.42 | 20,320 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $37.05 | $32.10 to $39.36 | 6,530 |
| Registered nurses | $47.84 | $39.33 to $52.20 | 73,150 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arizona | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.6 | 23.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 10.4 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Advanced Healthcare of Mesa's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (75.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
75.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arizona: 74 better, 1 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 570 eligible stays.
9.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arizona: 4 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 620 eligible stays.
5.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arizona: 6 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 385 eligible stays.
62.8% this home
Median of homes: Arizona69.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 285 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 351 residents counted.
5.8% this home
Median of homes: Arizona0.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 351 residents counted.
96.4% this home
Median of homes: Arizona95.1% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: AHC OF MESA LLC. CMS links this home to Advanced Health Care, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 4.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New AHC Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2021 |
| The Gail Miller Gst Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 72% | 01/01/2024 |
| The Bryan Miller Utah Dynasty Trust Dated April 22, 2014 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| The G&h Miller Utah Trust Dated February 26, 2019 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Oxnam, Nathan | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Harrison, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/21/2014 | |
| Lhmsh LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| New AHC Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2021 | |
| Bobba, Dheeraj | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Harrison, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/29/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arizona. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.