Home / Massachusetts / Quincy
Alliance Health at Marina Bay
2 Seaport Drive, Quincy, MA 02171 · Norfolk County · (617) 769-5106
167 certified beds, about 154 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225680 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.99 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.77 of those hours.
37.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
CMS links it to Alliance Health & Human Services, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
November 21, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#131) with an unplanned weight loss, out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #131 to implement dietary recommendations/interventions after weight loss had been identified, and he/she continued to lose weight.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when two out of three nurses observed during a medication pass made five errors out of 27 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 18.52%. Specifically,1. For Resident #161, Nurse #3 prepared his/her medications, failed to identify the Resident and attempted to administer the medications to Resident #162; and,2. For Resident #93, failed to administer the correct does of Calcium plus Vitamin D; and3. For Resident #143, failed to administer the correct form of Vitamin B.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for an allegation of abuse for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate their abuse policy after an allegation of abuse was documented and reported on 5/1/25.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 30 residents.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for the use of psychotropic medications for one Resident (#163), out of a total sample of 30 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #163 to ensure a care plan had been developed for the use of Ativan/Lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication), to monitor for adverse effects/side-effects of the medication, and to monitor for targeted behaviors.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#160) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 30 residents.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #163 that staff performed hand hygiene and donned (put on) gloves and/or used utensils while handling ready to eat food during breakfast service/meal preparation.
September 23, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than five percent when one of two nurses made seven errors out of 40 opportunities, totaling a medication error rate of 17.5%. These errors impacted one Resident (#14), out of three residents observed. Specifically, the nurse administered the wrong dose of Buspar (for anxiety), Neurontin (for seizures or nerve pain), and Tylenol (for mild to moderate pain), and failed to administer Anoro Ellipta (inhaler for lung conditions), Fluticasone Propionate (inhaler for lung conditions), Ipratropium Bromide (aerosol for lung conditions), and Lidocaine patches (local anesthetic for pain management) as ordered.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label and date food products, and to maintain safe and clean equipment in four of five nourishment kitchenettes.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#303) was informed of and actively participated in his/her baseline plan of care within the first 48 hours following admission, out of a total sample of 31 residents.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were met for two Residents (#145 and #14), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #145, to administer care (one to one (1:1) assist during intake by mouth (PO)) in accordance to physician's orders; and 2. For Resident #14, to follow the standard of medication preparation and administration and document missed or refused medications that were ordered by the physician.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff properly labeled all medications stored in one of four medication carts reviewed once opened; and 2. Provide a permanently affixed compartment for the storage of a schedule IV (potential for misuse and dependence) controlled substance in one of two medication room refrigerators reviewed.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, observation, and meal test trays on two of three units, the facility failed to prepare and serve meals in a manner conserving flavor, were palatable, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#114), out of a total sample of three residents observed on a medication pass, infection prevention and control measures were implemented to prevent the potential transmission of infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed basic infection control practices, including hand hygiene, resulting in potential cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another).
September 13, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who complained of abdominal pain and experienced multiple episodes of diarrhea for several days which interfered with his/her ability to participate in rehabilitation therapy, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified his/her Physician in a timely manner of his/her change in condition, in an effort to obtain orders to meet his/her care and treatment needs. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Condition: Significant Change, dated as last revised 2/16/16, indicated that professional staff will promptly communicate with the physician, resident, and family regarding changes in condition. The Policy further indicated that the notification including date, time, and by whom, shall be documented in the clinical record by appropriate personnel. [...]
June 14, 2023Standard inspection · 11 citations
- G Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a decline in range of motion causing the development of a contracture for one Resident (#122), out of a total sample of 31 residents.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for one Resident (#113), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, staff stood over the Resident while feeding him/her meals, rather than seated at eye level.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#113) was free from restraints, out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, for Resident #113 the facility failed to assess the use of pillows under the fitted sheet on both sides of the bed as a potential restraint.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the Department of Public Health's (DPH's) Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS) a possible misappropriation of a discharged resident's property. Specifically, a family member completed a facility Complaint/Concern/Grievance Report form, which alleged 100 dollars was taken from a drawer.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately for two Residents (#85 and #142), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #85, accurately code a dental status; and 2. For Resident #142, accurately code the MDS as a discharge to the community.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#79 and #53), who required supervision with meals, received the supervision, and failed to implement an individualized care plan for heel boots for one Resident (#44), out of a total sample of 31 residents.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#122) that nail care was provided, out of a total sample of 31 residents.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide standards of quality care for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify areas of discoloration on Resident #65's left hand and areas of discoloration on both right and left forearms.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a Resident (#113) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, for Resident #113 the facility failed to complete a wound dressing change to bilateral heels and apply heel protectors per physician's order.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to identify a possible hazard for one Resident (#98), out of a total sample of 31 residents. Specifically, Resident #98 had a heating pad in his/her room.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when 2 out of 2 nurses observed made 3 errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 11.5%. Those errors impacted 2 Residents (#13 and #118), out of 4 residents observed.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on November 21, 2025, 3 on September 23, 2024, 3 on June 14, 2023.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Provide at least two remote exits on each floor or fire section of the building.
- F Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- F Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- F Provide at least two remote exits on each floor or fire section of the building.
- F Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- F Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
- F Provide at least two remote exits on each floor or fire section of the building.
- F Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- F Have properly sized and located compartments to protect residents from smoke.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.99 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.60 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.40 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.7% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.6% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.77 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.15 on weekdays and 3.60 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.99 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.99 | 0.77 | 4.15 | 3.60 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 154 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.11 | 0.83 | 4.28 | 3.68 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 150 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.20 | 0.80 | 4.37 | 3.77 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 146 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.29 | 0.92 | 4.46 | 3.86 | 6.7% | 0 of 91 | 143 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.5 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.8 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.3 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ALLIANCE HEALTH OF QUINCY, INC.. CMS links this home to Alliance Health & Human Services, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 3.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Health Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 08/01/1999 |
| Lument Real Estate Capital LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/31/2024 | |
| Brunetti, Tammy | Corporate director | Individual | 03/06/2019 | |
| Calkins, Andrew | Corporate director | Individual | 03/06/2017 | |
| Corridan, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 09/17/2008 | |
| Grady, Francis | Corporate director | Individual | 07/15/2013 | |
| Gray, Alfred | Corporate director | Individual | 03/06/2019 | |
| Janisko, Jerome | Corporate director | Individual | 01/25/1999 | |
| Jennings, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 09/25/2024 | |
| Jones, Erik | Corporate director | Individual | 11/26/2018 | |
| Mourtzinos, Arthur | Corporate director | Individual | 06/19/2014 | |
| Riley, James | Corporate director | Individual | 09/20/2006 | |
| Robbins, Christopher | Corporate director | Individual | 11/17/1999 | |
| Zampine, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 11/30/2016 | |
| Grady, Francis | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2016 | |
| Kemp, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2016 | |
| Lavallee, Thomas | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2016 | |
| Alliance Health Management Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2013 | |
| Gallego, Cailin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Ostrem, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Alliance Health Management Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2025 | |
| Gallego, Cailin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2025 | |
| Ostrem, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/19/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Bostonian Nursing Care & Rehabilitation Center Dorchester, 1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- St. Joseph Rehab & Nursing Care Center Dorchester, 1.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Boston Home, Inc (the) Boston, 2.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 0 citations
- Care Village at Mattapan Mattapan, 3.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 58 citations
- Hancock Park Rehabiliation and Nursing Center Quincy, 3.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- South Cove Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Quincy, 3.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Laurel Ridge Rehab and Skilled Care Center Boston, 3.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Regalcare at Quincy Quincy, 4.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 29 citations
Common questions
- What is Alliance Health at Marina Bay's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Alliance Health at Marina Bay 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Alliance Health at Marina Bay get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2025. The Massachusetts average is 6.8.
- Has Alliance Health at Marina Bay been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Alliance Health at Marina Bay accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Alliance Health at Marina Bay?
- CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Alliance Health & Human Services. Legal business name: ALLIANCE HEALTH OF QUINCY, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.