Home / Washington / Longview
Americana Health and Rehabilitation
917 7th Avenue, Longview, WA 98632 · Cowlitz County · (360) 425-5910
74 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505361 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 20 health citations since January 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.93 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.85 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Evergreen Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.
November 21, 2025Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to initiate bowel interventions for 5 of 8 residents (Resident 17, 24, 27, 2 & 6) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, experiencing health complications and a diminished quality of life.
- E Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) access devices were assessed, maintained and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 1 & 46) reviewed for IV therapy. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified complications including loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential negative health outcomes.
- D Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed (the act of legally transferring property from one entity to another) to the Office of Financial Recovery (OFR) within 30 days of death or discharge for 1 of 2 discharged residents (Resident 62) reviewed for trust accounts. This failure resulted in a delayed final accounting and conveyance of Resident 62's funds.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Safety Device Evaluation and Consent and/or physician's order for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 43) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk of injury, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure admission Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were completed within 14 days of admission as required, for 1 of 18 sample residents (Resident 2) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' health status and care needs for 2 of 18 sample residents (Residents 6 & 2) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/ unmet care needs and decreased quality of life.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 46) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified/ unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 46). Failure of nursing staff to follow and/or clarify physicians' orders when indicated, and to notify the physician of weight variances and when medications were held, placed residents at risk delayed changes in medication regimen, hypotension, falls and other adverse outcomes.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) received treatment and services to maintain and/or improve ROM. The failure to ensure residents were offered/provided Restorative Nursing Programs (RNPs) at the frequency they were assessed to require, placed residents at risk for decline in ROM, contracture formation, reduction in strength and mobility, increased dependence on staff and decreased quality of life.
December 17, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators, and in 1 of 1 nourishment refrigerators/freezers reviewed for proper food storage. This failure placed residents at risk for cross-contamination, food borne illness, and a diminished quality of life.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to label medications with the date first accessed in 2 of 3 medication storage areas (Ocean Side medication storage room and Ocean Side medication cart) reviewed for medication storage and labeling, and the facility failed to ensure medications were kept secure when observed on a bedside table for 1 of 1 sampled residents (6) reviewed for medication storage. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving compromised/ineffective medications, medication errors and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering an influenza vaccination for 1 of 5 sampled residents (24) reviewed for right to be informed to make treatment decisions. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about vaccinations and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 2 sampled residents (19) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a decreased quality of life.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for anticoagulant side effect monitoring (a high-risk, blood thinning medication) for 1 of 5 sampled residents (150) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated for 1 of 6 sampled residents (35) reviewed for quality of care related to constipation. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, health complications and a diminished quality of life.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (33) reviewed for infection prevention and control. This failure placed residents at risk for contracting infectious diseases and a decreased quality of life.
May 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted regarding a signification change in respiratory status and failed to notify the physician of the need for oxygen administration orders related to oxygen levels and obtain timely a needed seasonal allergy and asthma medication for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for notification of changes including a significant change in resident health status. Resident 1 experienced harm when hospitalization and intubation was required for respiratory failure related to untreated respiratory symptoms. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life.
January 11, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing opportunities were provided for dependent residents for 1 of 2 sampled residents (145) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk of skin infections, decreased dignity, and a diminished quality of life.
- D Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed for 1 of 2 sampled nursing assistants (NA) (Staff E) reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving care from unskilled staff.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were accurately posted daily for 12 of 30 days reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure placed residents, resident representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census.
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on December 17, 2024, 6 on January 11, 2024, 3 on February 10, 2023.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- F Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Provide primary/alternate means for communication.
- F Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.93 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.31 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.77 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.15 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.17 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.70 in April to June 2025 to 3.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.93 | 0.85 | 4.17 | 3.33 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 49 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.30 | 0.82 | 4.51 | 3.77 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 46 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.90 | 0.78 | 4.14 | 3.28 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.70 | 0.64 | 3.93 | 3.10 | 2.2% | 0 of 91 | 51 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Washington
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.65 | $22.59 to $27.85 | 30,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $39.98 | $36.98 to $45.18 | 6,780 |
| Registered nurses | $59.71 | $49.57 to $64.54 | 69,260 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.4 | 14.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.3 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 43.1 | 15.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.0 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.7 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: AMERICANA SNF OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Evergreen Healthcare Group, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Americana SNF Operations, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Pacific Northwest SNF Operations Holdings (wa) LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Ch Pacific Northwest Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Pacific Northwest SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Witzcorp Global LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Bayhon, Marissa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Jeffries, Brandi | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Jason | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Jeffries, Brandi | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Spielman, Shimon | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Americana SNF Operations, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Financial Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Healthcare Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Washington SNF Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Chheda, Neel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Jeffries, Brandi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| McCoy, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Spielman, Shimon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Wilson, Tamara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Americana SNF Operations, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/17/2025 | |
| Ch Pacific Northwest Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/21/2025 | |
| Couve Healthcare Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/21/2025 | |
| Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/21/2025 | |
| Washington SNF Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/21/2025 | |
| Witzcorp Global LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Bayhon, Marissa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Chheda, Neel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Jeffries, Brandi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| McCoy, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Odenthal, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Spielman, Shimon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Wilson, Tamara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.33 hours per resident per day, below the Washington average of 3.80.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Frontier Rehabilitation and Extended Care Longview, 0.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Beacon Hill Rehabilitation Longview, 3.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Woodland Convalescent Center Woodland, 18 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Saint Helens Post Acute Saint Helens, 19.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 76 citations
Washington contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Washington DSHS Aging and Long-Term Support Administration, Residential Care Services, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-562-6028. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Americana Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Americana Health and Rehabilitation 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Americana Health and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2025. The Washington average is 15.8.
- Has Americana Health and Rehabilitation been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Americana Health and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Americana Health and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 41 owners and managers, and links the home to Evergreen Healthcare Group. Legal business name: AMERICANA SNF OPERATIONS, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.