Find a nursing home

Home / South Carolina / Aiken

Anchor Post Acute

550 East Gate Drive, Aiken, SC 29803 · Aiken County · (803) 643-3694

120 certified beds, about 112 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425311 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 20 health citations since June 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,428 in the last three years; the largest was $9,428, and the latest is dated July 2, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.

67.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).

CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 20 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
2E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 11, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's floor and equipment including two ovens, the shelves on two metal rolling carts, three stove top spill pans, three metal racks, one reach in freezer, five food preparation pans, and large manual can opener and its base attachment were kept clean. These failures had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 102 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitation revised on 04/2006 indicated, Policy Statement-The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All kitchen, kitchen areas, and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish . 2. [...]
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 (Residents (R)1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans failed to include the care required for R1's nephrostomy tube. care plan directing measurable goals and interventions for one of a total sample of 29 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, and the inability to meet their maximum practicable level of functioning. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team dated March 2022 included, .the Comprehensive, person-centered care plans are based on resident assessments and developed by an interdisciplinary team (lDT). [...]
  3. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance received services for one of four residents (Resident (R) R63) reviewed for fingernail care and bathing in a total sample of 24 residents. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, feelings of embarrassment, and/or medical issueReview of the facility's policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of dated 2002 documented, .Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular cleaning. Proper nail care can aid in the prevention of skin problems around the nail bed. [...]
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident (R)15 and R63) reviewed for respiratory care in a sample of 24 residents received oxygen as ordered by the physician and R15s oxygen unit was clean and sanitary. This failed practice has the potential to cause respiratory issues and /or infections for residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated October 2001 documented, .Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered.1. [...]
  5. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have medications available for administration for one (Resident (R) 57) of seven sampled residents whose drug regime was reviewed in a total sample of 24 residents. The facility failed to have R57's Clonazepam medication (Generic name- Klonopin which is an antianxiety medicine) available to administer as prescribed for two days, which caused the resident to not feel well and have increased anxiety. Review of R57's admission Record revealed R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of which included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. [...]
  6. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, test tray observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot to four of four residents (Resident (R) 4, R35, R57, and R80) reviewed for food palatability out of a total sample of 24 residents. This failure had the potential to affect 102 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen and could result in residents skipping meals and experiencing weight loss. Review of the facility's policy titled Food and Nutrition Services dated 10/17 indicated, Policy Statement Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident . 7. [...]
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interview, and review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility nursing staff failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing direct care for one of one (Resident (R)1) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in the sample of 24 residents. This could place this resident and other residents and staff at risk of infection by cross-contamination. Observation on 09/09/25 at 10:30 AM of R1 lying in bed revealed a small black bag hanging on the side of her bed. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)3 at this time confirmed that R1 has a nephrostomy tube. [...]
September 3, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications and biologicals in 2 of 2 medications observed.
July 2, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine remained clean and not contaminated, ensure proper hand hygiene when serving food from the steam table, ensure proper handwashing when going from a dirty to a clean area, and ensure staff (Cook1) wore a beard guard for one of one kitchen. These failures had the potential to affect 105 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen.
  2. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable as expressed by five of five residents (Resident (R) 26, R27, R52, R53, and R55) in a group interview, in that the hot foods when served to the residents did not taste hot and the food was not seasoned. This had the potential to affect 105 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide resident care in a manner that prevented cross-contamination for one of one resident (Resident (R) 42) reviewed for catheter care of 23 sampled residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for three of three residents (R65, R36, and R12) when providing care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This failure could promote the spread of multi drug resistant organisms throughout the facility.
  4. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medication for one of one resident (Resident (R) 27) reviewed for self-administration of medication of 23 sample residents. This had the potential to affect resident medication safety at the facility.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, document review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to respond to resident grievances in a timely manner for one of one resident (Resident (R) 75) reviewed for grievances out of 23 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect resolution of resident concerns.
  6. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 254) reviewed for abuse were free from abuse of 23 sample residents. Specifically, R254 reported that she was afraid to push her call light due to two instances of intimidation and verbal abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1. This had the potential to affect resident safety at the facility.
  7. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report staff to resident abuse when they failed to report the allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of two residents (Resident (R) 254) reviewed for abuse of 23 sample residents. These failures had the potential to contribute to further verbal abuse and possible psychosocial harm. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigation, revised September 2022, indicated All reports of resident abuse, neglect exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (As required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. [...]
  8. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted for an allegation of abuse for one of two residents (Resident (R) 254) reviewed for abuse of 23 sample residents. These failures had the potential to contribute to further abuse and possible psychosocial harm.
  9. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents and/or their representatives (Resident (R) 11, R25 and R101) reviewed for facility initiated emergent hospital transfer, from a total sample of 23 residents, were provided with written transfer/discharge notice that contained the required information. This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their Resident Representative (RR) by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred, and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired.
  10. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent accidents for one of one resident (Resident (R) 32) when they failed to implement an intervention listed on the care plan of 23 sample residents. This failure had the potential to cause the resident harm from a fall out of bed.
  11. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident (R) 6) had a gradual dose reduction (GDR) conducted according to the physician approved recommendation from the pharmacist in a timely manner of 23 sample residents. This had the potential for the resident to receive unnecessary antipsychotic medications.
June 17, 2022Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 17, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's policy, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the completion of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three residents (Resident (R) 7, R32, and R9) of six residents reviewed for timely assessment completion.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
July 2, 2024Fine $9,428

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeSouth CarolinaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.423.843.86
Registered nurses0.360.630.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.213.333.42
Nurse aides1.98
Licensed practical nurses1.08
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)67.8%45.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover60.0%42.1%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.21 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 24.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.420.363.503.21 24.9%0 of 90112
Oct to Dec 20253.670.423.673.65 19.4%0 of 92110
Jul to Sep 20253.570.343.603.50 19.2%0 of 92106
Apr to Jun 20253.590.293.743.21 24.7%0 of 91107
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
South Carolina, Jan to Mar 20263.620.533.813.137.2%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeSouth CarolinaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.311.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.20.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.73.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.21.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.612.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.75.14.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.515.315.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
26.424.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.413.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.72.01.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.71.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: AIKEN COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Palmetto Community Healthcare, LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/29/2021
Muniz, LeopoldoContracted managing employeeIndividual09/21/2021
Lawrence, RaW-2 managing employeeIndividual08/29/2022
Apt, FrederickCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Jergensen, JoshuaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Mitchell, JohnCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 2, 2024: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.21 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Anchor Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Anchor Post Acute 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Anchor Post Acute get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 11, 2025. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
Has Anchor Post Acute been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,428 in the last three years.
Does Anchor Post Acute accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Anchor Post Acute?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: AIKEN COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection