Home / South Carolina / Myrtle Beach
4452 Socastee Blvd, Myrtle Beach, SC 29588 · Horry County · (843) 293-1137
88 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425323 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 7, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 8 health citations since October 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,788 in the last three years; the largest was $8,788, and the latest is dated February 7, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.25 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
57.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Ivy Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and accident prevention for 1 (Resident (R)65) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The failure resulted in R65 sustaining a right 11th rib fracture on 09/02/2025 after the resident fell.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to prevent missappropriation of resident property for Resident (R)2 and R3. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 removed 5 pills from the narcotic locked box, belonging to R2 and R3. LPN1 did not administer the medications to the residents, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a procedure was followed during wound care, to prevent the spread of infection for Resident (R)9, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for wound care.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide food storage in a safe manner in 1 of 1 main kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety with an implementation date of March 2022, revealed Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food. Policy Explanation and Complaisance for Staffing: 6. The head cook, or designee, shall be responsible for checking the refrigerator daily for food items that are expiring, and shall discard accordingly. Review of the facility policy titled, Sanitation Inspection with an implementation date of March 2022, revealed Policy: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 8 residents, (Resident (R)13, R68, R53, and R73), had their call light within reach. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated August 2022, revealed, Policy: The purpose of this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each residents' bedside . to allow residents to call for assistance. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All staff will be educated on . ensuring resident access to call light. 5. With each interaction in the resident's room or bathroom, staff will ensure the call light is within reach of resident and secured, as needed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident(R)33 was invited to attend care planning meetings and to have input on focused care areas, goals and interventions recognized by the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and biologicals were removed from 2 of 2 treatment carts and not stored with other medications and biologicals for resident use on 2 of 2 halls, [NAME] and Rose.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dumpster area in a sanitary manner to prevent the harborage of pests for 1 out of 2 dumpsters. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse with an implementation date of March 2022 revealed, Policy: The facility shall properly dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 7. Refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility shall be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/16/2022 at 11:36 AM, observations were made of the facility's dumpster area. There were 2 large dumpsters and a large recycle bin labeled Cardboard Only. [...]
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 7, 2026 | Fine | $8,788 |
| February 7, 2026 | Payment Denial | 2 days from March 5, 2026 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.25 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.77 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.3% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.32 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.41 in April to June 2025 to 3.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.25 | 0.36 | 3.32 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.42 | 0.36 | 3.48 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.40 | 0.38 | 3.49 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.41 | 0.41 | 3.48 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 80 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.90 | $16.81 to $19.08 | 21,760 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.72 | $27.59 to $34.24 | 9,400 |
| Registered nurses | $39.60 | $37.17 to $46.75 | 49,750 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.2 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.4 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Angel Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
61.5% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · South Carolina: 53 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 211 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · South Carolina: 0 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 245 eligible stays.
7.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · South Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 176 eligible stays.
82.3% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 141 residents counted.
0.4% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina0.5% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 226 residents counted.
3.1% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 226 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: South Carolina98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ANGEL OAK NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Ivy Healthcare Group, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 1.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyman, Chaim | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/21/2021 | |
| Dugosh, Shelia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Hyman, Chaim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/15/2021 | |
| Majeed, Faisal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2024 | |
| Dugosh, Shelia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/20/2025 | |
| Hyman, Chaim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/15/2021 | |
| Majeed, Faisal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/27/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.