Find a nursing home

Home / Ohio / Carroll

Arbors at Carroll

3680 Dolson Court Nw, Carroll, OH 43112 · Fairfield County · (740) 654-0641

99 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365474 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 5, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 32 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.

44.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

CMS links it to Arbors at Ohio, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
26D
6E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 19, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment during a mechanical lift transfer of a resident who was on enhanced barrier precautions. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The facility census was 93 residents.
March 5, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was treated with dignity when his indwelling urinary catheter collection bag was not covered and was visible from the hallway. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 91.
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide privacy while incontinence care was provided. This affected one resident (#22) of one resident reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 91. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an initial admission date of 01/06/23 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, dementia, convulsions, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, seizures, peripheral vascular disease, celiac artery compression syndrome, hypertension, insomnia and anxiety disorder. Review of the plan of care dated 10/11/23 revealed the resident had bowel and bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility and physical limitations. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide off-loading (a critical technique used to reduce pressure on specific areas of the body, particularly in wound care) for a stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss where subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include tunneling or undermining). This affected one resident (#21) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 91. [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely podiatry care for Residents #30 and #51. This affected 2 residents (#30 and #51) of 9 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 91. Findings Include:1. Record review for Resident #30 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: spinal stenosis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was last seen by podiatry services in the facility on 10/21/25. [...]
  5. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased observation, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy on dental services, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely dental services related to dentures. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for dental. The facility census was 91.
November 25, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and labeling of medications. This affected eight residents (#49, #56, #57, #58, #62, #63, #68 and #70) of 29 who received medications for the medication cart on South Long Hall. The facility census was 95.
December 12, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance received turning and repositioning and transferring to a char as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #59) of two residents reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 96.
  2. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure a referral to an ophthalmologist for cataract surgery was made for Resident #17. This affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for communication and sensory. The facility census was 96.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, facility fall investigation reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement timely interventions after a resident fall. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were conversion disorder, intellectual disabilities, aneurysm of heart, hypertension, hyperparathyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lack of coordination, dysphagia, dementia, major depressive disorder, spondylosis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, osteoarthritis, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, and hypertensive heart disease. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/24, revealed she had a mild cognitive impairment. [...]
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietician recommendations were implemented timely and orders were followed. This affected 2 (Residents #12 and #74) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 96. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 08/06/10. Medical diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, dysphasia, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #12's care plan dated 10/31/23 revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutritional status related to therapeutic diet, and medical diagnosis that include hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, depression, cognitive communication deficit, anemia, and GERD. [...]
  5. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received trauma-informed care that accounted for the resident's experiences and preferences in order to minimize or eliminate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the residents. This affected two residents (#73 and #43) of two residents reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility census was 96.
  6. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed controlled medications were recorded on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) when administered. This affected one resident (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 96.
  7. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure medication parameters were in place and followed for Resident #34, #69, and #79, who received blood pressure medication. This affected three residents (#34, #69, and #79) of six residents who were reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 96.
  8. D
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    F770 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete laboratory testing as ordered by the physician for Resident #81. This affected one resident (#81) of two residents reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 96.
February 14, 2024Standard inspection · 15 citations
  1. E
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary spreadsheets were followed and all food items on the spreadsheets were offered to the residents according to their needs on a level three dysphagia diet. This affected 14 residents, (Residents #6, #10, #14, #17, #31, #33, #48, #59, #61, #64, #66, #72, #85, and #89) the facility identified as having physician orders for a level three dysphagia diet, out of 87 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Resident #68 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the lunch menu dated 02/07/24 revealed ham steak, rice pilaf, broccoli and cheese sauce, assorted cookies, and a beverage was the scheduled meal. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, review of the pureed ham recipe and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared to the appropriate pureed consistency. This affected nine residents, (Residents #2, #22, #27, #29, #41, #49, #50, #76, and #297) the facility identified as having physician orders for pureed diets, out of 87 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Resident #68 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the lunch menu dated 02/07/24 revealed ham steak, rice pilaf, broccoli and cheese sauce, assorted cookies, and a beverage was the scheduled meal. [...]
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene protocols during pureed food preparation. This had the potential to affect all nine residents, (Residents #2, #22, #27, #29, #41, #49, #50, #76, and #297) the facility identified as having physician orders for pureed diets, out of 87 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Resident #68 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the lunch menu dated 02/07/24 revealed ham steak, rice pilaf, broccoli and cheese sauce, assorted cookies, and a beverage was the scheduled meal. Review of the dietary spreadsheets dated 02/07/24 revealed residents with an ordered pureed textured diet should receive pureed ham steak, pureed rice pilaf, pureed broccoli with cheese sauce, pureed cookies, and a beverage. [...]
  4. E
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, review of laboratory test results, review of McGreer's criteria for infections, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship policies and procedures prior to starting antibiotic treatment for two residents (Residents #43, and #84). The facility also failed to ensure laboratory test results were received prior to starting antibiotic treatment for one resident (Resident #11). The deficient practices affected three residents (Residents #11, #43, and #84) of seven residents reviewed for infections and antibiotic use. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an initial admission date on 06/08/21 and a readmission date on 10/23/23. [...]
  5. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess Resident #84's dental status. This affected one resident (#84) of 27 sampled residents. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 08/04/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hemiplegia. Review of a nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed it stated Resident #84 does not use dentures or partials and edentulous was not marked. Review of an initial nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed it stated Resident #84 had her own teeth. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 08/11/23 revealed Resident #84 was not edentulous and did not have broken or loose dentures. [...]
  6. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled to Resident #46. The deficient practice affected one resident (#46) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date on 11/18/23. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. [...]
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure timely treatment was initiated urinary tract infections. This affected two residents (#43 and #84) of six residents reviewed for antibiotic use/urinary tract infections. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 08/04/23 with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and urinary retention. Review of nursing progress notes on 11/13/23 at 11:10 A.M. revealed Resident #84 received the last dose of an antibiotic and stated she feels a little better but not all the way. The resident continued to be slightly confused at times. The nurse updated the nurse practitioner who said it was okay to get another urine culture if needed in the morning. On 11/14/23 at 11:37 P.M. a urine specimen was collected. [...]
  8. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 received treatment to maintain vision abilities. This affected one resident (#39) of one resident reviewed for communication/sensory abilities. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 03/10/23 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, diabetes, and psychosis. Record review revealed the resident went out of the facility three times weekly for dialysis. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 01/01/24 revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition (a score of 8-12 = moderately impaired cognition and a score of 13-15 = intact cognition). [...]
  9. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer to Resident #19's nose caused by his glasses. This affected one resident (#19) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 88. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder, diverticulitis, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, hyperlipidemia, contracture of left hand, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/24, revealed Resident #19 was cognitively intact. [...]
  10. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #85 received services to prevent decrease in range of motion and to maintain or improve mobility. This affected one resident (#85) of three residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 06/07/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness/paralysis). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 12/12/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #85 had impairment in range of motion on one side, upper and lower. The resident was dependent upon staff for transfers. [...]
  11. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of fall investigations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete neurological checks following unwitnessed falls for Resident #17. The deficient practice affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 08/07/23 and a readmission date of 09/21/23. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, history of falling, and type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was rarely or never understood. Per staff assessment, Resident #17 had moderately impaired cognition. [...]
  12. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure all physician ordered nutritional interventions to prevent weight loss were consistently implemented for Resident #53. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, acute respiratory failure, cardiomyopathy, dysphagia, muscle weakness, hypertension, polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, depression, and hypotension. [...]
  13. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility list of medications not to be crushed, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 15% and included four medication errors of 26 medication administration opportunities. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 88.
  14. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered medication in accordance with physician orders and prescribing instructions for use of the medications. This affected two residents (Residents #46 and #297) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 88.
  15. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely dental care and services for one resident (Resident #46). This affected one resident (Resident #46) of one reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date on 11/18/23. Medical diagnoses included heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, type two diabetes mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 had intact cognition and scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. [...]
October 24, 2023Complaint inspection, Infection control · 2 citations
  1. E
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · infection control inspection · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of a self reporting incident (SRI), review of the facility's related investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation when residents' controlled narcotic pain medication was not misappropriated. This affected 18 residents (#10, #17, #22, #26, #29, #42, #47, #53, #67, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96, and #97) identified by the facility during their investigation into an allegation of misappropriation as having had their controlled narcotic pain medications misappropriated.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · infection control inspection · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of a self reporting incident (SRI), review of the facility's related investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal/ emotional abuse. This affected one (Resident #46) of one residents reviewed for abuse.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 5, 2026, 1 on December 12, 2024, 1 on February 14, 2024.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · March 5, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · December 12, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · February 14, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOhioUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.583.693.86
Registered nurses0.570.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.183.283.42
Nurse aides2.32
Licensed practical nurses0.69
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.6%48.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover22.2%43.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.74 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.58 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.580.573.743.18 0.0%0 of 9092
Oct to Dec 20253.640.543.773.29 0.0%0 of 9294
Jul to Sep 20253.370.453.493.05 0.0%0 of 9294
Apr to Jun 20253.440.373.573.10 0.0%0 of 9188
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 20263.640.603.803.244.6%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOhioUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.45.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.20.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.43.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.66.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.43.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.48.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.024.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.612.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.51.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CARROLL OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Arbors at Ohio, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ark Opco Group, LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/2015
B&y Healthcare S Corp5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2015
B&y Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2015
Cody Healthcare S Corp5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2015
Craig Flashner 2007 Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2015
Norcross, RobertContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2015
Rogers, StaceyContracted managing employeeIndividual07/01/2015
Kirk, KristineW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/01/2016
Flashner, CraigCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2015
Perlstein, YitzchokCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2015
Noble Healthcare Management, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2015
Prestige Administrative Services, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2016
Flashner, CraigOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2015
Perlstein, YitzchokOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 16 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 25, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 14, 2024: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 19, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.18 hours per resident per day, below the Ohio average of 3.28.

Other nursing homes nearby

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Arbors at Carroll's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Arbors at Carroll 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Arbors at Carroll get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 5, 2026. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Arbors at Carroll been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Arbors at Carroll accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Arbors at Carroll?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Arbors at Ohio. Legal business name: CARROLL OPCO LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection