1590 Chartwell Street, Lancaster, OH 43130 · Fairfield County · (740) 687-5100
84 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366215 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 8, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since April 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.83 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.84 of those hours.
45.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Altercare, an affiliated group of 22 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with continued weight loss was provided with nutritional supplements as ordered. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review and review of The Center for Clinical Standards and Quality QSO-24-08-NH memo, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during wound care. This affected one resident (#61) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and store food in a safe manner. This affected all the residents residing in the facility, except Resident #69 who was nothing by mouth. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 had appropriate diagnosis for psychotropic's and failed to monitor Resident #51's behaviors. This affected one residents (#51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure the state was notified of a change in mental disease for Resident #28 and #51. This affected two residents (#28 and #51) of two residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening/Resident Review Identification Screen (PASARR). The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for two residents (#5 and #184) in the area of swallowing strategies and c-pap use. This affected two residents (#5 and #184) of 23 sampled residents. The facility was 82. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an initial admission date of 07/25/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular disease, fungal endocarditis, choledocholithiasis, Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, obstructive and reflux uropathy, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, seizures, chronic kidney disease, retention of urine, benign prostatic hyperplasia, abdominal aortic aneurysm, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide daily wound care as ordered for Resident #182. This affected one (Resident #182) out of one resident reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/19/25, with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, abnormal weight loss, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of weight record for Resident #62 revealed on 03/17/2025, the resident weighed 215.6 lbs. On 04/14/2025, the resident weighed 190.8 lbs, which reflects an 11.50% loss. Review of care plan dated 03/20/25 revealed the resident is at risk for altered nutrition related to urinary tract infection, candidal sepsis, impaired skin integrity, diabetes, edema, obesity, and the need for a therapeutic diet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of medical record, and review of facility policy the facility failed to have physician orders in place for Resident #184's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) and failed to ensure oxygen orders were followed and oxygen administration was documented for Resident #33. This affected two residents (#33 and #184) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 82. 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/15/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate protein- calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, and altered mental status. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was rarely or never understood. He received oxygen therapy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure the physician gave a clear reason why a pharmacy recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) was not performed on residents with psychotropic's. This affected two residents (#28 and #51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 82.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of a repair bid from an outside vendor, the facility failed to maintain the dish machine in the kitchen in safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during meal service. This affected four (Residents #34, #35, #36, #37) of 44 residents residing on the Pleasantville Unit. The facility census was 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified dining experience by serving resident meals on Styrofoam tableware and cups with plastic cutlery. This affected three (Residents #30, #42, and #73) of three residents observed for meal service and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) meeting sign in sheets, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the infection preventionist attended the QAPI meetings. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents in the facility. The census was 80.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, weakness, anxiety, heart disease and unspecified urinary incontinence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/14/23, revealed Resident #11 had severely impaired cognition, required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Review of Resident #11's ADL care plan, dated 12/29/22, revealed Resident #11 required assistance from staff for incontinence care. Further review of the incontinence care plan, dated 09/02/21, revealed Resident #11 required staff to assist with changing clothing, incontinence briefs, and linens as needed due to soiling. Observation on 02/26/24 at 9:49 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve residents in a dignified manner during the dinner meal service. The deficient practice affected eight residents (Residents #6, #11, #18, #24, #32, #39, #50, and #54) of 14 residents who served meals in the dining room on the memory care unit (Speret Hall). The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain air temperature at a comfortable level in the small dining room. This had the potential to affect 54 (Residents #2, #3, #6, #8, #9, #10, #12, #13, #15, #16, #20, #22, #23, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #34, #37, #40, #41, #43, #44, #46, #47, #48, #49, #53, #56, #57, #58, #59, #62, #68, #69, #71, #72, #73, #74, #77, #134, #136, #137, #139, #140, #141, #142, #284, #285, #334, #335, #336, and #337) of 80 residents in the facility who could go to the small dining room. The census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Monthly Infection Tracking Logs, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics according to their antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). This affected six (Residents #7, #40, #42, #51, #58, and #253) out of 80 residents in the facility. The facility census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of insurance records, review of financial records, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide spend down notices to residents and/or resident representatives when their personal funds account was within $200 of the Medicaid personal funds limit. This affected two (Residents #2 and #20) of five residents reviewed for personal funds accounts. The census was 80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and interview the facility failed to maintain adequate and acceptable infection control practices during medication administration for Resident #13 and for Resident #232 who was in isolation to prevent the spread of infection including COVID-19. Observations during medication administration revealed medications were handled by the nurse with bare hands when administering to Resident #13 and two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs), STNA #43 and STNA #58 were observed to enter Resident #232's room, a resident who was in droplet isolation precautions for COVID-19 without applying all required personal protective equipment (PPE) including gown and gloves. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, financial record review, staff interview and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to maintain accurate and timely accounting practices for services received and charged to Resident #3. This affected one resident (#3) of six residents whose financial records were reviewed. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, sepsis, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, psychosis, dementia, mood disorder, dysphagia and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/11/22 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. [...]
9 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 8, 2025, 4 on February 26, 2024, 4 on April 4, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.83 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.84 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.16 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.83 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.5% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 15.8% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.22 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.06 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.83 | 0.84 | 4.06 | 3.23 | 3.5% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.73 | 0.93 | 3.95 | 3.18 | 6.7% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.78 | 0.95 | 4.02 | 3.18 | 5.3% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.86 | 3.87 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lanfair Center for Rehab & Nsg Care Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (66.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
66.4% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 288 eligible stays.
12.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 287 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 146 eligible stays.
47.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 115 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 135 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 135 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LANFAIR CENTER FOR REHABILITATION & NURSING CARE, INC.. CMS links this home to Altercare, a group of 22 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tsg Nursing Centers, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/13/2002 |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Andrew M Schroer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Gerald F Schroer Jr | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Fbo Matthew Schroer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Gerald F Schroer Dynasty Tr Ua 12312009 Margaret S Goodman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| Susanne Schroer Dynasty Trust U/a | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/15/2015 | |
| The Schroer Group, Inc. | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2001 | |
| Mock, Douglas | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Mock, Douglas | Corporate director | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Film, George | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2019 | |
| Goodman, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/15/2003 | |
| Logan, Justin | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Mock, Douglas | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/20/2021 | |
| Nutter, Orian | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Altercare of Ohio, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/30/2000 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.