1900 East Main Street, Lancaster, OH 43130 · Fairfield County · (740) 653-8630
99 certified beds, about 88 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1970
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365250 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since June 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $20,678 in the last three years; the largest was $20,678, and the latest is dated May 16, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.07 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
58.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a wound treatment was implemented timely. This affected one (Resident #93) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 91.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility risk management investigations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations/ incidents of potential resident to resident physical abuse were reported to the State survey agency as required. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care plans were individualized and comprehensively addressed all areas of the residents' care this affected two residents (Residents #17 and #65) of 28 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 88. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 04/05/2024 with diagnoses including Ogilvie syndrome (intestinal pseudo-obstruction), schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, insomnia, hypertensive heart disease, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/22/25 revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely hygiene care to removing facial hair. This affected two residents (Residents #36 and #55) of the four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a wound was properly identified as a pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #4) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 88. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 06/06/25 with diagnoses including inflammatory disorders of scrotum, gangrene Fournier, dementia, and cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was at risk for pressure ulcers and the resident had one or more pressure ulcers. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not smoke in an area that also had residents with portable oxygen on. This affected one (Resident #23) of one residents reviewed for smoking. The facility also failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as per the plan of care for a resident with the history of falls. This affected one (Resident #35) of four residents reviewed for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to timely complete an ordered urinalysis laboratory test and appropriately address a urinary tract infection (UTI) for Resident #52. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for UTI's. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately monitor the nutritional status of a resident with the history of a significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #37) of one residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent duplicate pain medication orders and when administering as needed medications they failed to attempt nonpharmacological interventions and describe the pain for Resident #2 and #5. This affected two residents (#2 and #5) of one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and one of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, manufacturer guide review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than five percent. There were two observed medication errors of 28 opportunities observed, resulting in a 7.14 percent medication error rate. This affected one Resident (#103) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration and had the potential to affect 15 residents who received insulin at the facility. Facility census was 88. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 12/31/25 with diagnoses including alcoholic hepatitis without ascites, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, and heart failure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) as guided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for Resident #4 and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during catheter care for Resident #9. This affected two of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 ' s wheelchair was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 88.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation to the state department of health in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #43) of three incidents reviewed. The census was 93. Findings Include: Observation on 11/17/25 at approximately 11:55 A.M. revealed Resident #43 lying in bed with a white towel lying over her right shoulder/upper arm area. She was observed with a slight grimace as if in pain. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatment and assessments were appropriately implemented and completed. This affected one resident (#76) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 93. Record review for Resident #76 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Parkinsonism, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition. Review of the nurses' progress note, dated 04/07/25, revealed right thigh healed. Treatment orders discontinued. Review of the care plan, revised 06/25/25, revealed the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity. Interventions included blister to right thigh (05/10/25). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from burns. This affected one resident (#76) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 93. Record review for Resident #76 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Parkinsonism, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/01/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition. Review of the nurses progress note, dated 02/20/25, revealed Resident #76 had spilled coffee on himself during lunch. The resident would not allow staff to remove his pants to assess the area where coffee had spilled. Review of the nurse progress note, dated 02/20/25, revealed Resident #76 had been brought back from the dining area after he had spilled coffee on himself. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and closed medical record review, the facility failed to ensure blood draw orders were obtained for Resident #110 who was receiving Vancomycin (strong antibiotic) intravenously per standards of care. This affected one (Resident #110) of three residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration. The facility census was 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected three residents (#12, #30 and #31) observed for incontinence care and one resident (#45) of one resident self-propelling in the hallway. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, controlled drug sheet review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive program to safeguard controlled substances and ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected four residents (#18, #21, #38 and #102) sampled during reconciliation of controlled substances and one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for infection. The census was 87.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, self-reported incident (SRI) review, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to safeguard controlled substances to prevent misappropriation. This affected one resident (Resident #13) of three residents identified in a self-reported incident. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely assess an indwelling catheter, treat urinary tract infections and provide adequate incontinence care. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections and one resident (#12) of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for a gastrostomy tube during medication administration. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents with an enteral tube observed for medication administration. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for a gastrostomy tube. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents observed for medication administration with 12 errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 48%. The census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled as required. This affected one resident (#21) of four residents sampled during reconciliation of controlled substances. The census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to monitor/log infections and possible trends and failed to perform handwashing when indicated. This affected one resident (#30) of three residents observed for incontinence care and one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement appropriate antibiotic stewardship. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents sampled for infections. The facility census was 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, review of hospital progress notes, staff interview, resident interview, resident representative interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe outdoor smoking area for residents assessed to be independent with smoking, failed to ensure Resident #100 was accurately assessed for the ability to safely smoke without supervision, failed to ensure Resident #100 was appropriately assessed for the ability to extinguish herself in the event of a fire (she had hemiplegia and hemiparalysis of the left arm and leg and required assistance from two staff members for transfers), failed to ensure the resident had reasonable access to a fire blankets and/or fire extinguisher, and failed to ensure the resident had the means to obtain assistance in the event of a fire. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure multi use vials of tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) were dated when they were opened. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents in the facility. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was not expired and was stored appropriately. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene when handling food. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents who resided in the facility. The facility identified all 93 residents received meals from the kitchen. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the menu, review of the dietary spreadsheet, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed. This affected 23 residents (Residents #1, #3, #6, #10, #13, #18, #22, #32, #36, #40, #41, #43, #45, #50, #59, #63, #69, #77, #81, #85, #153, #247, and #299) who were ordered a dysphagia advanced, mechanical soft, or pureed diet. The facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteTHIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported Incident, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints. This affected one (Resident #56) out of one resident reviewed for abuse. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to allow a resident who smoked, the opportunity to smoke. This affected one resident (Resident #86) of one resident reviewed for resident rights. Findings Include: Resident #86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarctions, dissection of vertebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, visual field defects, muscle weakness, tobacco use, hyperlipidemia, and acute ischemic heart disease. Resident #86 was discharged from the facility on 05/04/22. Review of Resident #86 medical records revealed a progress note dated 05/04/22 indicated the resident was to discharge from the facility because he was unable to smoke while in isolation. Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed no evidence the resident was assessed for smoking safely at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nail care and removal of facial hair for Resident #63. This affected one resident (Resident #63) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 12/28/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, thrombocytopenia, anxiety and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of two persons for personal hygiene and was totally dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the plan of care for activities of daily living revealed Resident #63 required assistance with grooming such as shaving and nail care. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately monitor Resident #61's pressure ulcer. This affected one (Resident #61) out of four reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings Include: Review of medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intraspinal abscess and granuloma, sepsis, and scoliosis. Review of Resident #61's admission assessment on 05/11/22 revealed Resident #61 had an area to right buttock that measured two centimeters (cm) long and 6.5 cm wide. Review of a Body assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had a suspected deep tissue injury (SDTI) to the right buttock that measured two cm long and 6.5 cm wide. The Skin Integrity Report dated 05/12/22 revealed Resident #61 had a deep tissue injury (DTI) to right buttock that measured 6.5 cm long and two cm wide. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate indication for use of as needed pain medications. This affected two residents (Residents #34 and #80) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, severe sepsis, cellulitis of left lower limb, hypomagnesemia, type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, cirrhosis of liver, hypothyroidism, chronic ischemic heart disease, fibromyalgia, anxiety disorder, hypoexmia, cystitis, myoclonus, osteoarthritis, hyperkalemia, anemia, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, hypotension, and edema. Review of Resident #34's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/23/22, revealed she was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide as needed dental service for Resident #73. This affected one resident (Resident #73) out of two residents reviewed for dental services. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 05/16/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, protein calorie malnutrition, lupus and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Resident #73 had no problems with chewing or swallowing. Resident #73 had frequent moderate pain and received scheduled and as needed pain medication. [...]
21 fire safety citations on file: 8 on January 8, 2026, 8 on May 16, 2024, 5 on June 30, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | Fine | $20,678 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.07 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.69 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.70 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.6% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.7% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.15 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.22 on weekdays and 2.69 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.07 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.07 | 0.47 | 3.22 | 2.69 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 88 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.05 | 0.44 | 3.21 | 2.63 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.53 | 3.34 | 2.68 | 1.3% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.13 | 0.60 | 3.33 | 2.64 | 8.4% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.6 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Buckeye Care and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 121 eligible stays.
12.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 130 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
86.2% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LANCASTER POST ACUTE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Group Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/07/2019 |
| Chernick, Edward | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2022 | |
| Dutiel, Brian | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/16/2019 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Dutiel, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.