Avamere Court at Keizer
5210 River Road N., Keizer, OR 97303 · Marion County · (503) 393-3624
69 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385233 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 19, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 18 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.97 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
18.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.
September 19, 2025Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the failed to revise the plan of care to reflect resident needs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
May 31, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
- F Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to receive and resolve resident and/or resident representative grievances for 1 of 1 sampled facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for unreported and unresolved grievances.
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to effectively respond to resident council concerns expressed at 3 of 3 resident council meetings reviewed for facility response to resident council concerns. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs concerning issues of resident care and lessened quality of life.
- E Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were notified of rights both orally and in writing on an ongoing basis for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for not being informed of their rights.
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility neglected to ensure resident needs were accommodated related to mechanical lift slings (device required to transfer) and briefs (incontinent undergarment) for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 6, 23, 27 and 29) reviewed for accommodation of needs during Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for loss of independence, social isolation and ADL decline.
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day for 9 of 62 days reviewed for registered nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of RN oversight including resident assessment, care and services.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and only accessible to authorized persons for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and stored in a way to minimize food spoilage, failed to ensure staff wore hair restraints, and failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen for 2 of 2 facility kitchens reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential infection related to foodborne pathogens.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate disinfection of a shared glucometer (a device used to obtain blood sugar levels) for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 15, 19, 29 and 45) observed for CBG monitoring and failed to ensure bilateral grab bars were sanitary for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for bloodborne infections and the spread of germs.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience by failing to provide meals to all residents at a table at the same time for 1 of 2 dining halls and 1 of 5 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for dining and food services. This placed residents at risk for not being treated in a dignified manner.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the needs of residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for hospice care. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders or implement bowel care timely for 3 of 6 sampled residents (#s 8, 20, and 151) reviewed for medications and pain. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and constipation.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic (affects brain activities) medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (# 303) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving sedation and complications of psychotropic drug use.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication pass error rate of less than 5%. There were two errors in 28 opportunities resulting in an 7.14% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects.
April 21, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours per day seven days per week for 17 of 123 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely RN assessments and care.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 17 and 32) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for weight loss.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents for dialysis, nutrition and unnecessary medications for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 13 and 49) reviewed for dialysis and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's catheter drainage bag was positioned properly for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for UTIs. This placed residents at risk for infections.
Fire safety inspections
16 fire safety citations on file: 9 on September 19, 2025, 5 on May 31, 2024, 2 on April 21, 2023.
Every fire safety citation16 citations
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.97 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.54 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.18 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.31 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 18.5% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.14 on weekdays and 4.54 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.52 in April to June 2025 to 4.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.97 | 0.48 | 5.14 | 4.54 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.71 | 0.45 | 4.90 | 4.22 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 52 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.48 | 0.52 | 4.65 | 4.03 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.52 | 0.47 | 4.69 | 4.09 | 0.4% | 1 of 91 | 52 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 36.1 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.8 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.3 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: KEIZER CAMPUS OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/16/2005 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/16/2005 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2025 | |
| Gasperini, Tracy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/16/2019 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Ruden, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Sawyer, Rebecca | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Xiong, Rebecca | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 02/02/2026 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/11/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/11/2025 | |
| Consolidated Billing Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/16/2005 | |
| Fusion Medical Staffing LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/12/2024 | |
| Incovate Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kevala Technologies, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/31/2023 | |
| Rande Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Sabra Health Care Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Becerra, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Veronica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/06/2024 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2024 | |
| Gasperini, Tracy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/16/2019 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2021 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Polson, Justin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Ruden, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Sawyer, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/05/2023 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Xiong, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 31, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 19, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 31, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 31, 2024: "Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Keizer Nursing and Rehabilitation Keizer, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Windsor Health and Rehabilitation Salem, 3.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Tierra Rose Care Center Salem, 4.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside Salem, 7.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Salem Transitional Care Salem, 8.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation Mount Angel, 12.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Woodburn, 12.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- Independence Health and Rehabilitation Independence, 13.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Avamere Court at Keizer's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avamere Court at Keizer 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avamere Court at Keizer get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on September 19, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Avamere Court at Keizer been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Avamere Court at Keizer accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avamere Court at Keizer?
- CMS lists 67 owners and managers, and links the home to Avamere. Legal business name: KEIZER CAMPUS OPERATIONS, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.