Salem Transitional Care
3445 Boone Road Se, Salem, OR 97317 · Marion County · (503) 576-3000
80 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
Ownership changed in the last 12 months Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385234 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $22,523 in the last three years; the largest was $22,523, and the latest is dated January 12, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.81 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
44.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Cascadia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 47 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
109/23
601/24
102/24
205/24
210/24
1204/25
201/26
907/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
27D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
July 24, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike dining environment for 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed for resident council. This placed residents at risk for an institutional dining experience and lower quality of life.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate contact precautions for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 8, 23 and 125) reviewed for contact precautions. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infection.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notification to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#130) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents at risk for lack of information related to financial liability.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within the regulatory timeframe for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#128) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed care needs.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#2) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to initiate treatment for an identified skin issue for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#32) reviewed for pressure wounds. This placed residents at risk for worsening wounds.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antihypertensive and anticonvulsant medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#112) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medication.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure there was a designated staff member responsible for collaborating and communicating with hospice representatives, and that the care plan included the hospice plan of care for 1 of 1 sampled resident(#2) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for uncoordinated and unmet hospice care needs.
- B Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the state survey inspection results contained the most recent survey results for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident council. This placed residents and the public at risk for not being informed of the facility's survey history.
January 29, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide transfer assistance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 4) reviewed for ADL assistance. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses of sepsis (unspecified organism), lobar pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Nursing Care Note dated 10/31/25 documented Resident 4 was assisted back to her/his room after dinner. The assisting staff left the resident alone in her/his wheelchair in the room while obtaining assistance for a two-person transfer. Staff did not return to the resident's room for over one hour. Resident 4's MDS admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 14, was cognitively intact and was dependent for wheelchair mobility. [...]
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 7 sampled residents (# 2) reviewed for physician orders. This placed residents at risk for medical complications and unmet medication needs.
April 15, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 12 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a heat pack was safely applied for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#76) reviewed for accidents. Resident 76 sustained burns.
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews for CNA staff were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk due to lack of competent staff.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have a system to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 4 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 4, 5, 6, and 7) reviewed for in-service training. This placed residents at risk for care provided by incompetent staff.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor resident preference for medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (#77) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for not having the opportunity to exercise her/his autonomy (self-governance) regarding choices.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to honor resident choice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#77) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for choking.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify office of the State long-term care ombudsman of the transfer/discharge for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 26 and 52) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of notification of their transfer/discharge.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a resident representative a bed hold policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge related to their right to return to the facility.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 77) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' pressure injuries were monitored and care plans were updated for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 52 and 77) reviewed for pressure ulcers and choices. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure injuries.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate catheter care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#226) reviewed for catheter care. This placed residents at risk for unmet catheter needs. The facility's External Catheter Policy, dated 2001, revealed: To verify a physician's order existed for the procedure, review the resident's care plan to assess any special needs, and assemble the equipment and supplies. Resident 226 was admitted to the facility in 4/2025 with a diagnosis including kidney failure. A 4/3/25 Hospital History and Physical Notes indicated Resident 226 had an external urinary catheter placed on 3/31/25. A 4/6/24 SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Note indicated Resident 226 continued to void dark urine, denied any urinary issue, and her/his catheter was changed. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wrote2. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility in 3/2025 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and heart disease. The 3/2025 and 4/2025 MARs directed one time a day administration of isosorbide mononitrate (prevents chest pain and dilates blood vessels) for hypertension. Resident 62 received five doses from 3/19/25 through 3/23/25, five doses from 3/27/25 through 3/31/25, and four doses from 4/1/25 through 4/4/25. On 4/5/25, the MAR referred to electronic medication administration record (eMAR) notes. The MAR indicated medication administration on 4/6/25 and 4/7/25, but on 4/8/25, it referred to the eMAR notes. A 4/5/25 eMAR Order Note directed the administration of isosorbide mononitrate once daily and noted the medication card was not available within the facility. [...]
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was administered ibuprofen (NSAIDS/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) as prescribed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for hospitalization. This contributed to Resident 52's intestinal bleed and hospitalization.
October 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for dignity and abuse. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Staff 3 (LPN) adhered to professional standards of practice regarding residents' dignity and plan of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for abuse and dignity. This placed residents at risk for abuse and undignified treatment.
May 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the SSA (State Survey Agency) within the required reporting time of two hours for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for verbal abuse. This placed residents at risk for potential ongoing abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for verbal abuse. This placed residents at risk for potential ongoing abuse.
February 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and prevent worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (#1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in the resident developing bilateral (both sides) Stage 4 pressure ulcers to the buttocks which required hospitalization, surgical intervention and placed other residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers.
January 12, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were logged and maintained, and failed to ensure proper labeling of biologicals for 2 of 2 medication storage refrigerators reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for receiving medications with reduced efficacy.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address hearing loss and the use of hearing aids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for decreased ability to communicate.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to professional standards related to the administration of pain medication. This placed residents at risk for experiencing pain.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist with a hearing device for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for social isolation and decreased quality of life.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for falls for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#21) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for injury from falls.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received pain medication as ordered for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#221) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for increased pain.
September 12, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for declined mobility and lack of quality of life.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 15, 2025.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 12, 2024 | Fine | $22,523 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.81 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.32 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.8% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 63.6% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.00 on weekdays and 4.32 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.29 in April to June 2025 to 4.81 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.81 | 0.58 | 5.00 | 4.32 | 2.1% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.55 | 0.69 | 5.79 | 4.96 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.24 | 0.62 | 5.47 | 4.64 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 66 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.29 | 0.53 | 5.48 | 4.82 | 2.1% | 0 of 91 | 64 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.4 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.5 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SALEM OF CASCADIA LLC. CMS links this home to Cascadia Healthcare, a group of 47 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cascadia Oregon Operations LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Cascadia Hc Group LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Cascadia Healthcare LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Cascadia Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Laforte, Stephen | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| White Oak Healthcare Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Hammond, Owen | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Cascadia Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Hammond, Owen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Harbert, Shawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/23/2026 | |
| James, Patrick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Ruden, Nathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Cascadia Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/06/2025 | |
| Salem 3445 Realty, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2025 | |
| Harbert, Shawn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/27/2026 | |
| James, Patrick | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2025 | |
| Ruden, Nathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/21/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.32 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside Salem, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Tierra Rose Care Center Salem, 4.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Windsor Health and Rehabilitation Salem, 4.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Keizer Nursing and Rehabilitation Keizer, 7.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Avamere Court at Keizer Keizer, 8.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Independence Health and Rehabilitation Independence, 11 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Mt Angel Health and Rehabilitation Mount Angel, 15.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Dallas Retirement Village Health Center Dallas, 16.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 35 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Salem Transitional Care's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Salem Transitional Care 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Salem Transitional Care get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 24, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Salem Transitional Care been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $22,523 in the last three years.
- Does Salem Transitional Care accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Salem Transitional Care?
- CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Cascadia Healthcare. Legal business name: SALEM OF CASCADIA LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.