Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro
650 Se Oak Street, Hillsboro, OR 97123 · Washington County · (503) 648-8588
87 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385251 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 11, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 40 health citations since July 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $22,116 in the last three years; the largest was $13,624, and the latest is dated May 11, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.97 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1107/23
109/24
111/24
1201/25
105/25
101/26
1305/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
3G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
29D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
2C
May 11, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised and protected from avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to:(1) Ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#44), a severely cognitively impaired resident, who was left unsupervised in the community in a high-traffic, [NAME] area for an unknown period of time and was subsequently located and returned to the facility by law enforcement. This failure was determined to constitute an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation, placing Resident #44 at risk of being struck by a motor vehicle, resulting in serious injury, serious harm, impairment, or death; and(2) Ensure accurate and updated care plans for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3 and 47). [...]
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary treatment to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#92) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in worsening of Resident 92's pressure ulcers and subsequent hospitalization.
- F Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure rooms and bathrooms were free from damages and use of garbage bags as pull cords for 21 out of 55 sampled resident rooms (Room #s 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 210, 212, 214, 501, 502, 504, 505, 506, 507, 508, 509, 510, 511, and 513) and 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 8 and 75) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for an unhomelike environment.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care was provided in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for receiving care that did not promote their dignity.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promote self-determination for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#30) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for lack of honoring choices and care preferences.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 67 and 100) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for unknown financial liabilities.
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to 1 of 1 resident (#89) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for miscommunication of the discharge process.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide meaningful activities for dependent residents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#44) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for lack of social interaction, boredom and isolation.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and monitor skin conditions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#10) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for worsening skin conditions.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received necessary services to prevent a further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#64) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for the development of contractures.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate catheter care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for catheter care. This placed resident at risk for unmet catheter needs and infection.
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement individualized care plans that addressed the emotional and psychosocial needs of the residents for 2 of 3 residents (#s 15 and 30) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life.
- C Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the state survey inspection results were readily accessible for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident council. This placed residents and the public at risk of not being informed of the facility's survey history.
January 8, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 5 and 13) reviewed for bowel and wound care. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
May 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent a fall for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#3) reviewed for accidents. As a result, Resident 3 sustained a fracture of the right distal femur (the lower portion of the thigh bone).
January 21, 2025Standard inspection · 12 citations
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure overbed lights and television remotes were accessible for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6, 362 and 364) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for loss of independence.
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 6, 31, 35 and 363) reviewed for vaccination records. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate health records.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident request for a personal computer was honored for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial and activity needs.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage) notifications to 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 12 and 48) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This placed residents and their representatives at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to appeal and unknown financial liabilities.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to address a grievance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#38) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for unresolved grievances.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and care plan interventions to prevent falls were implemented for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury from accidents.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident respiratory equipment was maintained for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 9 and 10) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for increased respiratory concerns.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to identify a resident's past history of trauma and potential triggers of re-traumatization for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization.
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to identify and provide necessary behavioral health care and services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#31) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life.
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide physical and occupational therapy services as ordered for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for a decline in functional abilities and diminished quality of life.
- C Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement a process of notifying the Ombudsman when residents transfered to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 40 and 60) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed.
November 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect a residents' right to refuse some types of non-requested transfers within the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse a transfer to another room for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5, 7, and 19) reviewed for resident's rights. This placed residents at risk for lack of honored choices.
September 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to evaluate elopement risks for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for elopement. This placed residents at risk for unsafe elopement.
July 31, 2023Standard inspection · 11 citations
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident skin impairments were identified, comprehensively assessed, routinely assessed, treated and monitored for healing or worsening for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#45) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unidentified, untreated and worsening skin impairments.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals for 2 of 4 medication carts observed during survey. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate hand hygiene before meals for 5 of 5 halls and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infection and unsanitary dining.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) accurately reflected the resident's preferred code status for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for advanced directives. This placed residents at risk for receiving incorrect and undesired medical interventions.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident request to formulate an Advance Directive was followed for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for Advanced Directives. This placed residents at risk for receiving incorrect medical interventions.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 dining room and 1 of 1 sampled resident (#38) reviewed for dining experience and personal property. This placed residents at risk for an unsatisfying meal experience, living in an institutionalized environment and not having individual needs met.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate hygiene related to nail care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#45) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#108) reviewed for a medication error. As a result, Resident 108 received erroneous medications on 7/10/21 and required transfer to the hospital on 7/11/21. The facility identified the noncompliance, immediately initiated a plan of correction which resulted in staff awareness and education to ensure accurate identification of residents, and no further medication errors occurred. This incident was identified as meeting the criteria for past noncompliance.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor meal preferences for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#53) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, stored appropriately and a resident refrigerator was properly cleaned and maintained for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 4 unit refrigerators reviewed for sanitary food storage and handling. This placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.
- D Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 39 and 163) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed regarding their legal rights.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 11, 2026, 3 on January 21, 2025, 4 on July 31, 2023.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | Fine | $8,492 |
| May 11, 2026 | Fine | $13,624 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.97 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.34 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.30 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 22.2% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.60 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.22 on weekdays and 4.34 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.78 in April to June 2025 to 4.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.97 | 0.68 | 5.22 | 4.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 70 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.71 | 0.71 | 4.96 | 4.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.55 | 0.61 | 4.79 | 3.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.78 | 0.54 | 4.99 | 4.26 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.0 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.2 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.8 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PECKHAM-MILLER, INC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karl Rickard Miller Jr Revocable Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/11/2011 |
| Miller, Karl | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/1996 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2005 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2005 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Cowgill, Stacia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/19/2024 | |
| Kelly, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loveday, Raven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/09/2024 | |
| Morris, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2012 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 05/04/2026 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/14/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/14/2025 | |
| Cowgill, Stacia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Julie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2024 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kelly, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2024 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loveday, Raven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/10/2025 | |
| Morris, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2012 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Polson, Justin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/05/2023 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Wilson, Cesce | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 18 problems in this area, most recently on May 11, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 15 problems in this area, most recently on May 11, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2023: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 31, 2023: "Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.34 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation Hillsboro, 1.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Forest Grove Post Acute Forest Grove, 4.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Marquis Forest Grove Post Acute Rehab Forest Grove, 5.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Maryville Beaverton, 7.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia Beaverton, 9.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Tigard Rehabilitation and Care Tigard, 11.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care Portland, 11.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Robison Jewish Health Center Portland, 11.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro get at its last inspection?
- 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 11, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $22,116 in the last three years.
- Does Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro?
- CMS lists 62 owners and managers, and links the home to Avamere. Legal business name: PECKHAM-MILLER, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.