Find a nursing home

Home / Oregon / Beaverton

Maryville

14645 Sw Farmington Road, Beaverton, OR 97007 · Washington County · (503) 643-8626

165 certified beds, about 130 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385166 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 24, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

Of 15 health citations since December 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $107,136 in the last three years; the largest was $107,136, and the latest is dated December 18, 2023.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.52 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.02 of those hours.

45.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 24, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the care plan related to dining was followed for 1 of 7 sampled residents (#151) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for choking.
April 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 22, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
April 11, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during meals for 1 of 6 halls reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received required assistance with ADLs for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#36) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene.
January 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow care plan interventions related to aspiration risks for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for accidents. Resident 3 admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage (severe head injury) and dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing). Resident 3's 9/3/24 Care Plan indicated the resident required one on one eating assistance due to dysphagia. The care plan stated staff were not to deliver until staff was ready to assist the resident. The 9/2024 admission MDS identified Resident 3 was cognitively intact. A 9/4/24 choking/aspiration investigation revealed Staff 5 (CNA) delivered Resident 3's lunch tray to the resident and informed Resident 3 that she would return to assist Resident 3 after delivering the last lunch tray. [...]
March 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was followed to provide care-planned assistance to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for falls. This resulted in Resident 3's hospitalization with leg fracture and surgical repair.
December 18, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess elopement risk and provide supervision to prevent a severely cognitively impaired resident from eloping for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#272) reviewed for elopement. This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation when Resident 272 eloped from the facility, was exposed to cold and rainy weather conditions, was without supervision at night in a high-traffic area, and was at risk for wandering into additional unsafe areas and getting lost. This placed the resident at risk for hypothermia, accidents, and a lack of access to support services.
  2. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent the development of moisture associated skin damage (MASD) and follow physician orders for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 322 and 372) reviewed for skin conditions and pain management. This failure resulted in Resident 372 developing MASD and placed residents at risk for increased pain.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#324) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for being treated in a dishonorable manner.
  4. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party of a change in condition for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#372) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for having uninformed responsible parties.
  5. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide written notification to 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 373 and 374) reviewed for Notice of Medicare of Non-Coverage (NOMNC). This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate bowel and bladder care for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 48 and 118) reviewed for bowel and bladder. This placed residents at risk for skin breakdown.
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy and to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#89) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse respiratory complications and outcomes.
  8. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 17 and 57) reviewed for medication administration. The facility's medication error rate was 10.71%. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
  9. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure 2 of 9 medication carts were properly secured during random observation. This placed residents at risk for reduced efficacy of medication and unauthorized access to medications.

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 6 on July 24, 2026, 2 on April 11, 2025, 3 on December 18, 2023.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  2. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  3. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  4. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  5. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  6. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · July 24, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  7. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · April 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · April 11, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · December 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · December 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
December 18, 2023Fine $107,136

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOregonUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.525.033.86
Registered nurses1.020.720.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.004.513.42
Nurse aides3.75
Licensed practical nurses0.74
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)45.9%47.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover34.5%51.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.73 on weekdays and 5.00 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.51 in April to June 2025 to 5.52 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.521.025.735.00 5.2%0 of 90130
Oct to Dec 20255.560.995.755.07 11.4%0 of 92137
Jul to Sep 20255.590.905.805.05 17.6%0 of 92137
Apr to Jun 20255.510.895.794.81 17.9%0 of 91135
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 20264.910.645.124.406.2%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oregon

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oregon, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.96$22.83 to $28.4014,800
LPNs and LVNs$38.69$35.11 to $43.604,260
Registered nurses$62.02$51.55 to $64.6339,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Maryville. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOregonUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.414.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.61.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.12.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.12.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.020.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.45.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.513.915.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.221.423.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.116.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.11.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.22.41.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Maryville's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

65.3% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 189 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 172 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oregon: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 135 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

49.6% this home

Median of homes: Oregon59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 127 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.5% this home

Median of homes: Oregon0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 160 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

6.1% this home

Median of homes: Oregon2.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 160 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

99.1% this home

Median of homes: Oregon98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SISTERS OF ST. MARY OF OREGON MARYVILLE CORPORATION.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
St. Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/01/2006
Altenhofen, AdeleCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2006
Baertlein, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2019
Barger, EricCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2016
Brecht, JeffCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Calcagno, KathyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2019
Dolan, JamesCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Duncan, FrancineCorporate directorIndividual06/25/2020
Fox, KelleyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Gilbert, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Rask, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual02/01/2017
Stewart, BryanCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2022
Vuylsteke, LeonardCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2019
Parry, KathleenCorporate officerIndividual07/06/2004
St. Mary of Oregon Ministries OregonOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/01/2006
Altenhofen, AdeleOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2006
Cope, BretOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Parry, KathleenOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/06/2004
Rodlun, LaureliOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2008
St. Mary of Oregon Ministries OregonAdp of the SNFOrganization01/20/2026
Altenhofen, AdeleAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2006
Parry, KathleenAdp of the SNFIndividual11/22/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 23, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 18, 2023: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 11, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Maryville's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Maryville 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Maryville get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on July 24, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
Has Maryville been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $107,136 in the last three years.
Does Maryville accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Maryville?
CMS lists 22 owners and managers. Legal business name: SISTERS OF ST. MARY OF OREGON MARYVILLE CORPORATION.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection