Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City
530 Birch Street, Junction City, OR 97448 · Lane County · (541) 998-2395
53 certified beds, about 46 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385229 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 28, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since January 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,678 in the last three years; the largest was $8,678, and the latest is dated June 7, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.75 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
45.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1601/23
804/24
206/24
607/25
312/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
19D
8E
5F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by Resident 14 for 2 of 5 residents (#s 12 and 13) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a treatment-related injury for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for catheter use. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and treatment as care planned for 1 of 5 residents (#10) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for delayed or unmet needs.
July 28, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were implemented for facility laundry services. This placed residents at risk for exposure to and contraction of infectious diseases.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and delayed treatment.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician and act upon a change in condition timely resulting in increased avoidable pain and psychosocial harm for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for skin conditions and behavioral health.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of trauma received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for mood and behavior this placed residents at risk for unmet needs and a decrease in their quality of life.
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with behavioral health needs, including substance use disorder received appropriate services for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 1 and 8) reviewed for behavioral health. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral health needs and increased risk of substance misuse or overdose.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were two errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities resulting in an eight percent error rate. This placed residents at risk for an ineffective medication regimen.
June 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 5) reviewed for medication. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed which required hospitalization, and placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects.
- D Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of financial resources for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#4) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for financial loss.
April 5, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a RN was available for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week for 19 of 60 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for lack of RN oversight including nursing assessments.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication storage temperatures were maintained within parameters for 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for receiving medications with reduced efficacy.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to store and handle food in a sanitary manner for 2 of 2 unit refrigerators and freezers reviewed for safe food storage. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control standards for head lice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for head lice. This placed residents at risk for head lice.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents with formulation of an advance directive for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for advance directive. This placed residents at risk for lack of individualized healthcare decisions.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was clean and in good repair for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 14 and 22) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unhomelike environment.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update resident care plans related to head lice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#37) reviewed for head lice. This placed residents at risk for lack of treatment.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure supervision and safety interventions were in place to prevent smoking related accidents for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for smoking safety. This placed residents at risk for burns and accidents.
January 19, 2023Standard inspection · 16 citations
- J Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical, verbal and emotional abuse for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 12 and 25) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation. Resident 25 was verbally and emotionally abused by Resident 30. Resident 25 experienced psychosocial harm as a result of Resident 30's targeted aggressive behavior toward Resident 25.
- G Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determine the facility failed to provide counseling services, a revised care plan and interventions related to trauma care for 2 of 5 residents (#s 15 and 25) reviewed for abuse and care planning. Resident 25 experienced repeat traumatization and psychsocial harm associated with increased anxiety, fear and decreased socialization.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infectious diseases.
- F Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for the facility. This placed residents at risk for developing antibiotic resistance.
- F Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a qualified and trained infection preventionist in place for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection prevention and control. This placed residents at risk for inadequate infection control.
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 14 of 41 days. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 12 errors in 34 opportunities resulting in a 35.49% error rate. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication side effects.
- E Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Inspectors wroteBased on the lack of effective systems for ensuring the provision of medically related social services, abuse investigation and reporting and IP oversight, the facility administration failed to utilize its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure all residents attained or maintained their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Resident 25 experienced psychosocial harm, and additionally residents were placed at risk for abuse and lack of infection control oversight.
- E Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor data and analyze events of abuse for 3 of 3 quarters. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- E Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the QAA committee consisted of the minimum required members for 3 of 3 quarters. This placed residents at risk for lack of identified facility improvement.
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were included in care planning for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#15) reviewed for care planning. This placed residents at risk for not being involved in the care planning process.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency allegations of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#25) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 3 and 24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of assessed needs.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive, person-centered care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for further accidents.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for medication administration for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5, 6,12, 29 and 188) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for medication complications.
Fire safety inspections
22 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 28, 2025, 3 on January 24, 2025, 9 on April 5, 2024, 9 on January 19, 2023.
Every fire safety citation22 citations
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Ensure that suites are correctly sub-divided by noncombustible or limited-combustible construction.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 7, 2024 | Fine | $8,678 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.75 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.42 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.93 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.6% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.88 on weekdays and 4.42 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.74 in April to June 2025 to 4.75 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.75 | 0.48 | 4.88 | 4.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 46 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.47 | 0.44 | 4.62 | 4.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.50 | 0.42 | 4.72 | 3.93 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.74 | 0.40 | 4.95 | 4.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 45 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.8 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.1 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: JUNCTION CITY REHABILITATION, LLC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariso LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/06/2006 | |
| Ari Operations, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/2006 | |
| Avamere Group LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/06/2006 | |
| Karl Rickard Miller Jr Revocable Trust | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 07/11/2011 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Melcher, Robb | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2005 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2005 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/06/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Good, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/16/2023 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loewen, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Ranieri, Allison | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/09/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2020 | |
| Miller, Karl | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/27/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/03/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/03/2025 | |
| Pacific Medical Specialty Group | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/12/2024 | |
| Sabra Health Care Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Snapmedtech,inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/08/2025 | |
| Brazee, Brittany | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/06/2024 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/30/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2024 | |
| Good, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/16/2023 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loewen, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Melcher, Robb | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Ranieri, Allison | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/09/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2024 | |
| Rolston, Billyjane | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/06/2024 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Sledge, Sandi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/03/2024 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/05/2023 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vellody, Nita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 28, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 28, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.42 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avamere Riverpark of Eugene Eugene, 10.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Green Valley Rehabilitation Health Center Eugene, 11.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 91 citations
- Valley West Health Care Center Eugene, 13.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Eugene Eugene, 13.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Hillside Heights Rehabilitation Center Eugene, 14 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Cascade Manor Eugene, 14.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Marquis Springfield Springfield, 14.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- South Hills Rehabilitation Center Eugene, 14.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 74 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 28, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,678 in the last three years.
- Does Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City?
- CMS lists 70 owners and managers, and links the home to Avamere. Legal business name: JUNCTION CITY REHABILITATION, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.