Avamere Riverpark of Eugene
425 Alexander Loop, Eugene, OR 97401 · Lane County · (541) 345-6199
119 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385185 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 2, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 47 health citations since June 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.25 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
41.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1506/23
103/24
1610/24
207/25
1303/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 47 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
43D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 2, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure narcotic drug records were in order and a count of all controlled drugs was maintained for 6 of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for drug diversion.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was informed in writing of the risks and benefits of a restraint and service dog denial for 2 of 9 sampled residents (#s 98 and 99) reviewed for accidents and choices. This placed residents at risk for not being informed.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to facilitate the resident's right to make choices about their diet for 1 of 4 (#5) residents reviewed for choices. This put residents at risk for lack of self-determination.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a Significant Change MDS assessment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain oral hygiene for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 3) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for reduced oral health.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain grooming and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 5 and 57) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 3 of 8 sampled residents (#s 10, 11, and 57) reviewed for edema, care planning, and unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unidentified conditions.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess a resident, thoroughly investigate and follow care plan interventions for elopement for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 99 and 102) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for elopement.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent a UTI for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#8) reviewed for urinary tract infections. This placed resident at increased risk for recurrent UTIs.
- D Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to address call lights in a timely manner for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 22 and 47) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for delayed care.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for side effects related to blood pressure medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications, were stored properly for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed. This placed residents at risk for reduced medication effectiveness.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical records.
July 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was monitored as recommended for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for accidents. Resident 12 experienced a fall from a broken shower chair, sustained rib fractures, and a closed head injury.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wrote2. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility in 7/2022 with diagnoses which included stroke. A 5/5/25 Bowel and Bladder Evaluation indicated Resident 16 was a candidate for scheduled toileting (timed voiding). A 5/5/25 quarterly MDS indicated Resident 16 was cognitively intact. A 6/3/25 care plan revealed Resident 16 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident 16 had a history of urgency incontinence. Interventions included assisting with using the bathroom before breakfast and after lunch per preference to anticipate needs, resident used briefs, provide incontinentence care as needed, and provide peri care (cleaning of the genital area) after an incontinent episode. A public complaint was received on 6/23/25 alleging in 6/2025 Resident 16 was not cleaned properly after a bowel movement. [...]
October 11, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 16 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#39) reviewed for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was included in the care planning process for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#77) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for lack of input in the care planning process.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician regarding refusals and changes in condition for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 26, 42, and 442) reviewed for medications, and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for lack of physician involvement.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the required parties were notified of resident hospitalizations for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 42, 44, and 89) reviewed for hospitalization and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 3 of 7 sampled residents (#s 42, 44, and 89) reviewed for hospitalization and change of condition. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive care plans within the required timelines and revise care plan interventions for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 38 and 42) reviewed for change of condition, ADL care and edema. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 39 and 442) for medication administration. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and cross contamination.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to dependent residents for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 21 and 37) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to properly assess pressure ulcers for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 13 and 62) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to supervise a resident while eating for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#292) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for aspiration or choking.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly assess and monitor respiratory status and maintain respiratory equipment for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 17 and 42) reviewed for respiratory services. This placed residents at risk for worsening respiratory status.
- D Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing for 2 of 8 sampled residents (#s 42 and 76) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#442) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects of medications.
- D Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents understood the meaning of an arbitration agreement (disputes resolved with a neutral party and not in court) for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 13 and 76) reviewed for arbitration. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed of their legal rights.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the community use glucometer was properly sanitized between resident uses for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#39) reviewed during CBG checks. This placed all residents who required CBG checks at risk for bloodborne illness.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic was indicated for use for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#17) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for antibiotic resistant organisms.
March 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and follow the care plan for 3 of 10 sampled residents (#s 3, 5 and 9) reviewed for medications and ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
June 30, 2023Standard inspection · 15 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess and treat residents' pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 16 and 79) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 16 developed at Stage 3 pressure ulcer. This placed residents at risk for infections.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide risk and benefits for the flu vaccine and/or provide vaccines for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 7, 13, 22 and 55) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for illness and lack of informed consent.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for lack of respectful encounters.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a cognitively impaired resident's representative was provided risk and benefits of a psychotropic medication prior to initiation and failed to ensure a resident's right to implement medication options was honored for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 63 and 76) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of appropriate medical treatment decisions.
- D Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to include a resident in the plan of care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for urinary catheter. This placed residents at risk for lack of inclusion in the care planning process.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents' ability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. This placed resident at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's gradual dose reduction (GDR) status for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#14) and to accurately assess a resident's dental status for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#76) reviewed for unnecessary medications and dental status. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to update resident care plans to reflect edema, ROM and infection control precautions for 3 of 8 sampled resident (#s 49, 66 and 69) reviewed for edema, rehabilitation and unecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of resident centered interventions.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to a ensure an order discrepancy related to pain medication was clarified and ensure a resident was assessed after falls for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 48 and 76) reviewed for pain and accidents. This placed residents at risk for increased pain and unidentified injuries.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall was investigated for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#76) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unassessed risk factors.
- D Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain specialized physician appointments for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#76) reviewed for bowel and bladder. This placed residents at risk for lack of specialized care.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to reorder pain medications in a timely manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#49) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for unrelieved pain.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to monitor a resident for psychotropic medication side effects for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 52 and 76) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication reactions.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#49) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for lack of pertinent medical assessment documentation in the clinical record.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed regarding infection control precautions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#79) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for infections.
Fire safety inspections
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 2, 2026, 1 on October 11, 2024, 2 on June 30, 2023.
Every fire safety citation4 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.25 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.72 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.62 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.12 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 41.1% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 46.2% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.46 on weekdays and 4.72 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.38 in April to June 2025 to 5.25 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.25 | 0.50 | 5.46 | 4.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.19 | 0.48 | 5.39 | 4.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.54 | 0.72 | 5.83 | 4.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.38 | 0.50 | 5.67 | 4.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.0 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.2 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.0 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: RIVERPARK OPERATIONS, LLC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avamere Group LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/06/2006 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2025 | |
| Hansen, Sara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/29/2023 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loewen, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Nashawi, Mhd Tarek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Parker, Karen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Peckron, Tabitha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/30/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/30/2025 | |
| Consolidated Billing Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/24/1998 | |
| Incovate Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kevala Technologies, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/20/2022 | |
| Moss Adams LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2009 | |
| Pioneer Healthcare Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/08/2024 | |
| Rande Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Sabra Health Care Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Glover, Amber | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/18/2025 | |
| Hansen, Sara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2023 | |
| Haskins, Damien | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Loewen, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Nashawi, Mhd Tarek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Parker, Karen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Peckron, Tabitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2024 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/05/2023 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 16 problems in this area, most recently on March 2, 2026: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on March 2, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on March 2, 2026: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on March 2, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Green Valley Rehabilitation Health Center Eugene, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 91 citations
- Avamere Rehabilitation of Eugene Eugene, 3.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 52 citations
- Hillside Heights Rehabilitation Center Eugene, 3.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- South Hills Rehabilitation Center Eugene, 3.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 74 citations
- Valley West Health Care Center Eugene, 3.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Cascade Manor Eugene, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia Eugene, 4.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Marquis Springfield Springfield, 5.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 33 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Avamere Riverpark of Eugene's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avamere Riverpark of Eugene 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avamere Riverpark of Eugene get at its last inspection?
- 13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 2, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Avamere Riverpark of Eugene been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Avamere Riverpark of Eugene accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avamere Riverpark of Eugene?
- CMS lists 75 owners and managers, and links the home to Avamere. Legal business name: RIVERPARK OPERATIONS, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.