1114 Chatman Blvd, Brooksville, FL 34601 · Hernando County · (352) 796-6701
180 certified beds, about 141 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105297 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since September 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $37,811 in the last three years; the largest was $37,811, and the latest is dated September 22, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.45 of those hours.
55.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Health Services Management, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for residents on enhanced barrier precautions for 1 of 4 residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions (Resident #69) and for 3 residents who were on contact precautions (Resident #71, #154 and #148) and failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when required during medication administration to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for hypoglycemia that required treatment for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #122) and for skin condition for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident #35, #80 and #87).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for the residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for behavioral health (Residents #6 and #152).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident #24) and 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #55 and #67).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services to prevent decrease in range of motion for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services (Resident #64).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor weights for residents who were at nutritional risk for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for weight loss (Residents #55 and #67).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective staffing system to ensure sufficient nursing staff for meeting the resident needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document urinary catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #6), failed to ensure change in condition was documented for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Residents #35, #80 and #87), and failed to ensure treatment documentation was accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified of the accident requiring physician intervention for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for enteral medication administration, Resident #86, and for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls, Resident #17.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident #65.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #20.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by physician for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration, Resident #13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label a medical nutrition supplement prior to administration according to professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for tube feeding, Resident #3 (photographic evidence obtained).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during meal service in 1 of 3 units (300 Unit) and during medication administration in 2 of 8 medication pass observations, and failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment in 1 of 3 units (300 Unit) while providing high contact care to the residents on enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from medical neglect by failing to implement policies and procedures for safety and supervision when the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #33. On 5/08/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in physician ordered treatment for 7 days for exposed reddened, sunburned skin. On 6/15/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in dehydration, decreased alertness, difficulty responding, heat exposure, heatstroke, and sunstroke. On 7/07/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised for a significant amount of time resulting in dehydration, excessive sun exposure, with evidence of tanning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents by failing to implement the policies and procedures for supervision when the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #33. On 5/08/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in physician ordered treatment for 7 days for exposed reddened, sunburned skin. On 6/15/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in dehydration, decreased alertness, difficulty responding, heat exposure, heatstroke, and sunstroke. On 7/07/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised for a significant amount of time resulting in dehydration, excessive sun exposure, with evidence of tanning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical well-being of each resident and to prevent medical neglect when the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for supervision when the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #33. On 5/08/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in physician ordered treatment for 7 days for exposed reddened, sunburned skin. On 6/15/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in dehydration, decreased alertness, difficulty responding, heat exposure, heatstroke, and sunstroke. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, resident record reviews, and review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to utilize the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to investigate, develop and implement an effective performance improvement plan (PIP) when the facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #33. On 5/08/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in physician ordered treatment for 7 days for exposed reddened, sunburned skin. On 6/15/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised resulting in dehydration, decreased alertness, difficulty responding, heat exposure, heatstroke, and sunstroke. On 7/07/2023, Resident #33 was left outside unsupervised for a significant amount of time resulting in dehydration, excessive sun exposure, with evidence of tanning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to complete and submit a federal report of medical neglect for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for reportable incidents, Resident #33.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed accurately for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen administration (Residents #346 and #39), 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for dietary services (Residents #7 and #29), and 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #97).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standard for performing hand hygiene during wound care for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #92).
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 21, 2026, 4 on September 22, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 22, 2023 | Fine | $37,811 |
| September 22, 2023 | Payment Denial | 9 days from November 11, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.60 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.45 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.9% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 47.6% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.84 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.69 in April to June 2025 to 3.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.60 | 0.45 | 3.75 | 3.23 | 13.1% | 0 of 90 | 141 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.79 | 0.51 | 3.91 | 3.47 | 23.5% | 0 of 92 | 138 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.60 | 3.92 | 3.51 | 15.0% | 0 of 92 | 129 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.69 | 0.55 | 3.80 | 3.41 | 11.6% | 0 of 91 | 139 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.1 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 34.0 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Brooksville Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (38.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.3% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 152 eligible stays.
12.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 211 eligible stays.
8.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 142 eligible stays.
31.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 166 residents counted.
5.1% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 166 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 7 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BROOKSVILLE HEALTH CARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Health Services Management, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Services Management, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/01/2000 |
| National Health Investors, Inc. | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 11/01/1990 | |
| Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 11/01/1990 | |
| Baxter, Kevin | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Fisher, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/02/2012 | |
| Jackson, Brian | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Shatz, Jim | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/06/2021 | |
| White, Joshua | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Health Services Management, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2000 | |
| Baxter, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Fisher, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Jackson, Brian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Shatz, Jim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/02/2021 | |
| White, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| National Health Investors, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/1990 | |
| Nhi-Reit of Florida, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/1990 | |
| Kolli, Anitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/1990 | |
| Pedersen, Candy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/12/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.