525 Fairview Avenue South, Saint Paul, MN 55116 · Ramsey County · (651) 695-5000
45 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245617 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 20, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 11 health citations since November 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $9,113 in the last three years; the largest was $9,113, and the latest is dated February 11, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.44 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.01 of those hours.
34.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Presbyterian Homes & Services, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R34) reviewed with a history of falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R34, R38) were offered and/or provided updated vaccination for pneumococcal disease, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to respect resident wishes for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resuscitation status, resulting in receiving cardiac pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) against her wishes established in her Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST). The IJ began on [DATE] when R1 was found unresponsive in her room and staff performed CPR based on an outdated POLST that was not corrected in R1's electronic medical record (EMR). R1's current POLST on [DATE] indicated DNR/DNI. The IJ was identified on [DATE]. The administrator, the director of nursing, and the regional clinical director were notified on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE] and the deficient practice was corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure ice packs were stored separately from food storage in all three of the unit kitchenette refrigerators. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of hair restraints during food service. These practices had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the care center who received food from the kitchen or snacks from the unit refrigerators/freezers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided when administering a topical medication (medication that is applied to the skin) for 1 of 1 residents (R18) observed during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 2 of 2 residents (R31, R41) who had pillows or perimeter mattresses placed on their beds preventing them from getting out of bed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a walking program was maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R31) reviewed for ambulation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration between the facility and a contracted hospice organization that affected 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R31, R22, R21) reviewed with a history of falls. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards for 1 of 1 resident (R20) found to have a space heater operating in their room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide proper eating utensils and assistance for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for adaptive equipment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R23) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations.
23 fire safety citations on file: 4 on November 20, 2025, 5 on October 17, 2024, 14 on November 16, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 11, 2025 | Fine | $9,113 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.44 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.01 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.95 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.95 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.48 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.0% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.64 on weekdays and 3.95 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.25 in April to June 2025 to 4.44 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.44 | 1.01 | 4.64 | 3.95 | 1.3% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.38 | 1.03 | 4.61 | 3.80 | 3.2% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.42 | 1.06 | 4.62 | 3.90 | 4.7% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.25 | 0.98 | 4.43 | 3.80 | 1.8% | 0 of 91 | 43 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $19.39 to $23.72 | 29,120 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.83 to $34.26 | 12,840 |
| Registered nurses | $48.80 | $42.76 to $55.17 | 70,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.0 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.3 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Carondelet Village Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 22 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 7 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CV SENIOR HOUSING LLC. CMS links this home to Presbyterian Homes & Services, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carondelet Village Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/14/2010 |
| Presbyterian Homes and Services | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 04/14/2010 |
| Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet, St. Paul Province | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 04/14/2010 |
| Computershare Corporate Trust Company, Na | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Belanger, Margaret | Corporate director | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Larson, Duane | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Meyer, Mark | Corporate director | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Reetz, James | Corporate director | Individual | 12/08/2017 | |
| Belanger, Margaret | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Meyer, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Reetz, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/08/2017 | |
| Phs Management, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/11/2011 | |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Linn, Luann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/05/2023 | |
| Meyer, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Mielke, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Peterson, Heidi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Phs Management, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/11/2025 | |
| Fletcher, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Linn, Luann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2023 | |
| Meyer, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2010 | |
| Mielke, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Peterson, Heidi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.