Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Saint Paul

Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East

740 Kay Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55102 · Ramsey County · (651) 328-2008

118 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245411 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 23, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 28 health citations since June 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.21 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.47 of those hours.

30.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
22D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
July 23, 2026Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure multi-dose medications were labeled upon opening and discarded in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medications rooms reviewed and 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, document review, the facility failed to ensure a proper sanitization technique was used to obtain food temperatures from ready-to-serve meals from the steam table. This finding had the potential to increase the risk of cross contamination and affect 17 residents who resided on the fourth floor.
  3. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications was assessed and determined to be appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for self-administration of medications.
  4. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the use of as needed (i.e., PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days or extended to a certain date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.
  5. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a discharge notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (OOLTC) for 2 of 2 resident (R87, R89) reviewed for discharge.
  6. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were followed to put on leg wraps for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for edema. In addition, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration between the facility and the hospice agency for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed who received hospice services.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R90) who were at risk of falls.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of clinical indications for the continued use of a foley catheter was in place and failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 residents (R90) reviewed with a catheter.
  9. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection prevention and control practices by using the required personal protective equipment (PPE) during Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for infection control.
  10. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · deficient, provider has September 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of correction (POC) for the most recent survey of the facility was readily accessible and that the POC for the three preceding years was available upon request. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility as well as family, visitors, and staff. During observation and record review on 7/22/26 at 8:10 a.m., a review of the survey results binder located near the elevators on the first floor of the facility was completed. Although the binder included the survey results from the past three years, the 2024 and 2025 survey results did not include the facility's plan of correction (POC) or indicate that these could be requested from facility staff. [...]
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff was wearing beard guards/restraints when preparing food. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents who reside at the facility and consume food from the kitchen. During observation on 4/16/25 at 10:03 p.m., cook (C)-A had a beard and was preparing roast beef and slicing it on the meat slicer. C-A was not wearing a beard guard/restraint. During observation on 4/16/25 at 10:11 a.m., the culinary manager (CM) had a beard and was stiring a large vat of beef stew. Then he started taking food temperatures and putting the food into an insulated food cart. The CM was not wearing a beard guard/restraint. During interview on 4/16/25 at 10:33 p.m., the CM verified the staff with beards were not wearing beard guards and it had never been an expectation for them to do so. [...]
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the provider of the use of antibiotics concurrent with warfarin, and to obtain a new INR monitoring date for 1 of 2 residents (R76) reviewed for medication administration.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 1 residents (R48) who had dried tube feeding formula on the base of the tube feeding pole.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R61) received treatments and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer per the comprehensive care plan.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a hand brace and palm protector was used consistently for 1 of 1 resident (R71) reviewed for range of motion (ROM).
  6. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to fully assess and follow up on weight loss and meal intakes for 1 of 2 resident (R73) reviewed for nutrition.
  7. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a feeding tube tubing and nutrition bag were labeled according to professional standards to avoid the possibility of feeding tube complications and or related infections for 1 of 1 residents (R48).
  8. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for respiratory care.
  9. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized during high-contact cares for 2 of 3 residents (R48 and R53) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).
September 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan with current interventions for the care of a new catheter and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented for 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed who had an indwelling catheter. In addition, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures for draining a catheter bag were implemented for 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed.
June 13, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled, and dated. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 dishwashers in the [NAME] and Macalester unit met minimum wash temperature. This had potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors who eat food from the main kitchen and use dishes from the [NAME] and Macalester unit.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure the least restrictive infection control measures were implemented for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for covid-19 exposure. Additionally the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R104) observed during contact precautions, failed to ensure standards of practice were followed for catheter care for 1 of 1 resident (R408) and failed to ensure proper storage of clean linen with the potential to impact 25 residents on two wings were implemented.
  3. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow resident to safely administer their own medication for 1 of 2 residents (R101) observed with medications at bedside.
  4. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to notify a provider for a significant weight gain for 1 of 1 resident (R104) reviewed for notification of change.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grooming was offered and or provided for 2 of 3 residents (R16, R8) reviewed for shaving. The facility also failed to ensure nail care was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for activitiy of daily living.
  6. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance to ensure eyeglasses were available in order to maintain vision needs for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed for vision.
  7. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure breakfast was provided to a resident prior to dialysis and failed to monitor food intakes for 1 of 3 residents (R20) reviewed for nutrition.

Fire safety inspections

13 fire safety citations on file: 4 on July 23, 2026, 9 on June 13, 2024.

Every fire safety citation13 citations
  1. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · July 23, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  2. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 23, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  3. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · July 23, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  4. B
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · July 23, 2026 · deficient, provider has
  5. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Install properly constructed and protected linen or trash chutes.
    K 541 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. C
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.214.193.86
Registered nurses1.471.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.733.713.42
Nurse aides2.72
Licensed practical nurses1.03
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)30.1%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover44.4%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.40 on weekdays and 4.73 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.30 in April to June 2025 to 5.21 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.211.475.404.73 1.1%0 of 9092
Oct to Dec 20255.321.525.554.72 1.8%0 of 9289
Jul to Sep 20255.251.315.474.71 1.9%0 of 9293
Apr to Jun 20255.301.425.514.78 1.8%0 of 9186
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.918.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.22.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.54.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.520.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.85.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.817.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.323.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.414.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (66.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

66.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 228 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 227 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 129 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

51.4% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 138 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.6% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 138 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SHOLOM HOME EAST INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sholom Community Alliance5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%07/13/1995
Furman, LisaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Jacobs, DavidCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Lampert, ReneeCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Meiches, RobertCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2017
Mosow, DanielCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Nirenstein, DavidCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2016
Packer, FlorenceCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Pierotti, JeremyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Resig, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Rosen, LayneCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2018
Rutzick, SherylCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2016
Salita, MarcCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Schanfield, PaulCorporate directorIndividual08/01/2018
Segal, JudithCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Seiler, ScottCorporate directorIndividual07/14/2014
Stone, JonathanCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2021
Ungerman, SoniaCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Weissman, DouglasCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Wolson, KimberlyCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2023
Berryman, DavidCorporate officerIndividual03/07/2016
Berryman, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/07/2016
Mortenson, SamuelOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/08/2024
Pederson, JaneOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2024
Schmeling, CoryOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/16/2019
Wyckoff, DouglasOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/13/2025
Sholom Community AllianceAdp of the SNFOrganization07/13/1995
Mortenson, SamuelAdp of the SNFIndividual02/13/2025
Pederson, JaneAdp of the SNFIndividual02/13/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East get at its last inspection?
10 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 23, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East?
CMS lists 29 owners and managers. Legal business name: SHOLOM HOME EAST INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection