Episcopal Church Home the Gardens
1860 University Avenue West, Saint Paul, MN 55104 · Ramsey County · (651) 632-8801
60 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2015
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245625 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.69 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.57 of those hours.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
808/23
103/24
809/24
203/25
105/25
608/25
111/25
604/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
27D
2E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 9, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to prevent spoilage and freezer burn and failed to ensure food items in 6 out of 6 kitchenettes were sealed, labeled and dated. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate glove use and hand hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (R19) during personal cares. The facility further failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R19) who had a nephrostomy tube and for 1 of 1 resident (R4) who had a catheter and was receiving catheter cares. The facility also failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R54) on droplet precautions was wearing a mask when out of her room. This had the potential to affect all 10 residents residing on the 3rd floor.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe for self-administration of medication (SAM) for 1 of 1 residents (R36) observed with a medication at the bedside.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained for 1 of 1 residents (R19) observed during personal cares.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered and maintained as ordered by the provider for 1 of 2 residents (R15) reviewed for respiratory care.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely for 1 of 5 residents (R10) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
November 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and document review, the facility failed to follow professional standards when a staff crushed delayed release medications and crushed pill capsules with other medications instead of opening and emptying the pill capsules for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for medication administration.
August 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed had a dignified existence when the three residents had been told to use an incontinent brief to toilet rather than staff assisting them to the bathroom.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to reduce the risk of accidents for residents 2 of 3 (R1 and R2) reviewed for supervision. The facility did not assess and document the aimed use for the intent of alarms to be used temporarily to assess patterns and routines of the residents. R1 and R2's family requested the alarms following multiple falls and concerns about adequate supervision.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds. The failed to accurately assess the residents for risk of entrapment by assessing residents medical diagnosis, size and weight, cognition, communication, and mobility for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for bed rails. In addition, R2 had side rails used in conjunction with an air mattress.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system to reduce the risk of significant medication errors for transdermal opioid patches for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. R1 was ordered by her hospice agency to have a transdermal opioid patch (narcotic medicated patch that slowly releases the medication into the body) placed on her skin every seven days. On two occasions the nursing staff failed to remove the old patch from her skin when the new patch was placed on her.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to establish a communication process between the facility and the hospice provider to ensure that the needs of a resident were addressed and met for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for hospice services. R1 did not receive the necessary care and services when she had the same medication error occur twice. In addition, the facility failed to have a designated member of the interdisciplinary team who was responsible to work with hospice to ensure residents receiving hospice services needs were met.
- D Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as a part of the regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed. The bed manufacturer guidelines indicated to visually inspect the bed and accessories monthly and indicated to follow the FDA guidance.
May 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the state agency and administrator of the facility, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. R1 reported to multiple staff members the care she received was rough causing pain, staff yelled at her, and a staff member heard another staff member yelling at R1.
March 26, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who were reviewed for falls.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor a skin tear (a traumatic wound that occurs when the top layer of skin separates from the underlying layers) for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for injury of unknown origin.
September 12, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a process in place to monitor refrigerator, dishwasher and breakfast food temperatures in all six unit kitchens in the care facility. In addition the facility failed to ensure opened food and beverage containers were dated to prevent unsafe consumption by residents. This had the ability to affect all 55 residents residing in the care facility.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to the facility failed to ensure proper use of gloves while providing personal cares for 1 of 1 resident (R35) observed for personal cares. In addition, the facility failed to sanitize a standing lift sling shared by residents for 2 of 2 residents (R35 and R9) observed for infection control practices.
- D Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure unqualified staff did not administer as needed (PRN) medication used for skin rash for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for qualified staffing.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assistance with personal hygiene for 2 of 2 residents (R6, R44 ) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to assist a resident, who was unable to maintain positioning for 1 of 1 resident (R40) reviewed for positioning.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement, and care plan, new and appropriate fall interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 2 residents (R40 and R51) reviewed for falls.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor orthostatic blood pressures during the use of an antipsychotic medication (used to manage delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or disordered thought) for 1 of 5 residents (R51) reviewed for antipsychotic medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure mediations were safely and securely stored for 1 of 1 resident (R38) reviewed for medication storage.
March 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of one resident (R3) reviewed for care plans when interventions were not put into the care plan following a care conference that led to a fall.
August 3, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement individualized fall interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R27, R35) and failed to ensure a route cause analysis was completed and new interventions were implemented following a fall for 1 of 1 resident (R6), who was at risk for and had a history of falls. This resulted in harm when R6 had a subsequent fall on 5/16/23 and sustained a lumbar fracture.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized to prevent the spread of infection when rinsing contaminated laundry. Furthermore, the facility failed to transport clean laundry in a manner which ensured protection from dust and soil. This had the potential to impact all 60 residents who reside in the facility.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment (SAM) was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 1 of 1 resident (R14) observed with medications at bedside. Findings inclued: R14's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R14 had intact cognition and diagnoses of mild intermittent asthma, heart disease , and chronic kidney disease. It further indicated R6 required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) except walking in room/corridor in which she required limited assistance. R14's medical record lacked a doctor's order to be able to self administer her medication. R14's Self Administration of Medications assessment dated [DATE], indicated R14 had no desire to self administer medications. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary equipment for 1 of 1 residents (R45) reviewed for environmental cleanliness.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to report a fall with major injury for 2 of 5 residents (R6, R27) reviewed for accidents.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a walking program for 1 of 1 residents (R25) reviewed for restorative rehabilitation.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor, assess, and ensure provider wound care orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R51) who had facility acquired pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic medication was properly labeled and secured for 1 of 1 residents (R38) reviewed for antibiotic use.
Fire safety inspections
25 fire safety citations on file: 2 on April 9, 2026, 8 on September 12, 2024, 15 on August 3, 2023.
Every fire safety citation25 citations
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- F Install properly constructed and protected linen or trash chutes.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 26, 2025 | Payment Denial | 22 days from June 26, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.69 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.57 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.30 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 4.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.93 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.43 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.85 on weekdays and 5.30 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.56 in October to December 2025 to 5.69 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.69 | 0.57 | 5.85 | 5.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.56 | 0.48 | 5.71 | 5.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.2 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.2 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.1 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: EPISCOPAL HOMES ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Episcopal Homes on University Avenue, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/27/2013 |
| Episcopal Home Care and Services | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/27/2013 | |
| Episcopal Homes of Minnesota | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 03/27/2013 | |
| Wells Fargo Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 05/01/2013 | |
| Franco, Keanan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 10/27/2015 | |
| Cutler, Lois | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Forbes, Carol | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Gilbertson, Melissa | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Gove, Peter | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Hawthorne, Rebecca | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2017 | |
| Hove, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 03/27/2013 | |
| Huber, James | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2017 | |
| McGowan, Diane | Corporate director | Individual | 03/27/2013 | |
| Nowlin, Sarah | Corporate director | Individual | 03/27/2013 | |
| Ostenso, Brian | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2015 | |
| Slawick, Jerome | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Clem, Mary | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Henry, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/19/2015 | |
| Mork, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/12/2016 | |
| Plakut, Marvin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/27/2013 | |
| Eh Services Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/27/2013 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Episcopal Church Home of Minnesota Saint Paul, 0.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- The Estates at Lynnhurst LLC Saint Paul, 0.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- St. Anthony Park Home Inc Saint Paul, 1.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- Lyngblomsten Care Center Saint Paul, 1.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Hayes Residence Saint Paul, 2.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Carondelet Village Care Center Saint Paul, 2.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Fairview University Trans Serv Minneapolis, 2.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 0 citations
- The Emeralds at St. Paul LLC Saint Paul, 3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Episcopal Church Home the Gardens's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Episcopal Church Home the Gardens 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Episcopal Church Home the Gardens get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Episcopal Church Home the Gardens been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Episcopal Church Home the Gardens accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Episcopal Church Home the Gardens?
- CMS lists 21 owners and managers. Legal business name: EPISCOPAL HOMES ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.