Home / Pennsylvania / Allentown
350 S. Cedarbrook Road, Allentown, PA 18104 · Lehigh County · (610) 395-3727
670 certified beds, about 506 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395465 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 16 health citations since April 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.00 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.
28.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on four of 13 nursing units. (Nursing Units C3, D2, D3, D4)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation to the State Survey Agency for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 83)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 29)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain adequate grooming for two of four sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 7 and 272)Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included a stroke and hemiparesis (paralysis on left side of the body). Review of the care plan revealed the resident required assistance from staff for ADLs. On April 14, 2026, at 10:55 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. Her fingernails were long, chipped, and dirty with a substance underneath her nails. She stated that she preferred her nails to be kept short, her nails needed to be cut, staff had not offered to cut her nails, and she had not refused. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for three of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 7, 83, 450)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement adequate safety interventions for one of 35 sampled residents. (Residents 83)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adaptive equipment was provided to one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to prevent the spread of infection for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment on one of 13 nursing units. (Station 3)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, employee file review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure employees completed required abuse training in a timely manner for two of eleven sampled newly hired employees. (Employees 11 and 26)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for three of 41 sampled residents. (Residents 228, 372, 481)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent falls for one resident (Resident 228), and failed to thoroughly investigate a fall to prevent reoccurrence for one resident (Resident 481) of nine sampled residents who had falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, resident interview, results of a test tray audit, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature on one of 13 nursing units. (C-3)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served in a manner that promoted and maintained each resident's dignity for two of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 82 and 175)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed to accurately reflect the resident's status for two of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 310, 437)
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians' orders were implemented for three of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 402, 437, 450)
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.00 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.60 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 28.5% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 18.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.16 on weekdays and 3.60 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.96 in April to June 2025 to 4.00 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.00 | 0.76 | 4.16 | 3.60 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 506 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.10 | 0.73 | 4.27 | 3.69 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 508 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.01 | 0.70 | 4.16 | 3.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 510 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.96 | 0.73 | 4.10 | 3.60 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 502 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.5 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedarbrook Senior Care and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (33.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
33.7% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 157 eligible stays.
8.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 229 eligible stays.
4.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 114 eligible stays.
43.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 106 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 123 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 123 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County of Lehigh Pennsylvania | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/01/1966 | |
| Julian, Michelle | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2019 | |
| Boandl, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/14/2024 | |
| Morrison Management Specialists Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Boandl, Adam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/14/2024 | |
| Cumello, Jason | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/23/2019 | |
| Julian, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2019 | |
| Amergis Healthcare Staffing, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/28/2024 | |
| County of Lehigh Pennsylvania | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/1966 | |
| Healthpro Heritage LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2021 | |
| Morrison Management Specialists Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| National Datacare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/23/2015 | |
| Boandl, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/14/2024 | |
| Cumello, Jason | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/23/2019 | |
| Julian, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.